Enhanced consumption of salient solutions following pedunculopontine tegmental lesions

Neuroscience

Volumn 284, Issue , 2015, Pages 381-399

  MacLaren, D A A ^a   Markovic, T ^a   Daniels, D ^a   Clark, S D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ADDICTIONS   (United States)

Author keywords

Dtx UII; Overconsumption; Pedunculopontine; Salience; Sucrose

Indexed keywords

IBOTENIC ACID; AMINO ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; DIPHTHERIA TOXIN; DRINKING WATER; QUININE; SACCHARIN; SODIUM INTAKE; SUGAR INTAKE; UROTENSIN; UROTENSIN II;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AVERSIVE BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CHOLINERGIC NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EXCITOTOXICITY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLUID INTAKE; LICKING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PEDUNCULOPONTINE TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS; PREDICTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SODIUM DEFICIENCY; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANIMAL; DRINKING; DRUG EFFECTS; FOOD DEPRIVATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SODIUM INTAKE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SUGAR INTAKE;

ANIMALS; CHOLINERGIC AGENTS; DIETARY SUCROSE; DIPHTHERIA TOXIN; DRINKING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRINKING WATER; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; FOOD DEPRIVATION; IBOTENIC ACID; MALE; PEDUNCULOPONTINE TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS; QUININE; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SACCHARIN; SODIUM, DIETARY; UROTENSINS;

EID: 84908565098     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.075     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Agmo A., Marroquin E. Role of gustatory and postingestive actions of sweeteners in the generation of positive affect as evaluated by place preference conditioning. Appetite 1997, 29:269-289.
2. Ainge J.A., Keating G.L., Latimer M.P., Winn P. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and responding for sucrose reward. Behav Neurosci 2006, 120:563-570.
3. Alderson H.L., Faulconbridge L.F., Gregory L.P., Latimer M.P., Winn P. Behavioural sensitisation to repeated d-amphetamine: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Neuroscience 2003, 118:311-315.
4. Alderson H.L., Jenkins T.A., Kozak R., Latimer M.P., Winn P. The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus on conditioned place preference to 4%, 12% and 20% sucrose solutions. Brain Res Bull 2001, 56:599-605.
5. Alderson H.L., Latimer M.P., Blaha C.D., Phillips A.G., Winn P. An examination of d-amphetamine self-administration in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus-lesioned rats. Neuroscience 2004, 125:349-358.
6. Alderson H.L., Latimer M.P., Winn P. A functional dissociation of the anterior and posterior pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: excitotoxic lesions have differential effects on locomotion and the response to nicotine. Brain Struct Funct 2008, 213:247-253.
7. Allen L.F., Winn P. Excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus disinhibit orofacial behaviours stimulated by microinjections of d-amphetamine into rat ventrolateral caudate-putamen. Exp Brain Res 1995, 104:262-274.
8. Arnt J., Bogeso K.P., Hyttel J., Meier E. Relative dopamine D1 and D2 receptor affinity and efficacy determine whether dopamine agonists induce hyperactivity or oral stereotypy in rats. Pharmacol Toxicol 1988, 62:121-130.
9. Balsara J.J., Bapat T.R., Gada V.P., Nandal N.V., Chandorkar A.G. Effect of ergometrine on methamphetamine and apomorphine stereotypy in the guinea-pig. J Pharm Pharmacol 1985, 37:514-517.
10. Baunez C., Amalric M., Robbins T.W. Enhanced food-related motivation after bilateral lesions of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci 2002, 22:562-568.
11. Beeler J.A., McCutcheon J.E., Cao Z.F., Murakami M., Alexander E., Roitman M.F., Zhuang X. Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food. Eur J Neurosci 2012, 36:2533-2546.
12. Berridge K.C. The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007, 191:391-431.
13. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?. Brain Res Rev 1998, 28:309-369.
14. Borsook D., Edwards R., Elman I., Becerra L., Levine J. Pain and analgesia: the value of salience circuits. Progr Neurobiol 2013, 104:93-105.
15. Bromberg-Martin E.S., Matsumoto M., Hikosaka O. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron 2010, 68:815-834.
16. Chambers R.A., Self D.W. Motivational responses to natural and drug rewards in rats with neonatal ventral hippocampal lesions: an animal model of dual diagnosis schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002, 27:889-905.
17. Chipkin R.E., McQuade R.D., Iorio L.C. D1 and D2 dopamine binding site up-regulation and apomorphine-induced stereotypy. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1987, 28:477-482.
18. Chopra K., Kulkarni S.K. Potentiation of dopamine receptor-mediated responses by B-Ht-920 in mice. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1988, 294:46-55.
19. Clark S.D., Alderson H.L., Winn P., Latimer M.P., Nothacker H.P., Civelli O. Fusion of diphtheria toxin and urotensin II produces a neurotoxin selective for cholinergic neurons in the rat mesopontine tegmentum. J Neurochem 2007, 102:112-120.
20. Costa R.M., Gutierrez R., de Araujo I.E., Coelho M.R., Kloth A.D., Gainetdinov R.R., Caron M.G., Nicolelis M.A., Simon S.A. Dopamine levels modulate the updating of tastant values. Genes Brain Behav 2007, 6:314-320.
21. Cyr M., Parent M.J., Mechawar N., Rosa-Neto P., Soucy J.P., Aliaga A., Kostikov A., Maclaren D.A., Clark S.D., Bedard M.A. PET imaging with [(1)(8)F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol ([(1)(8)F]FEOBV) following selective lesion of cholinergic pedunculopontine tegmental neurons in rat. Nucl Med Biol 2014, 41:96-101.
22. Dormont J.F., Conde H., Farin D. The role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in relation to conditioned motor performance in the cat. I. Context-dependent and reinforcement-related single unit activity. Exp Brain Res 1998, 121:401-410.
23. Duclos M., Ouerdani A., Mormede P., Konsman J.P. Food restriction-induced hyperactivity: addiction or adaptation to famine?. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38:884-897.
24. Dunbar J.S., Hitchcock K., Latimer M., Rugg E.L., Ward N., Winn P. Excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus of the rat. II. Examination of eating and drinking, rotation, and reaching and grasping following unilateral ibotenate or quinolinate lesions. Brain Res 1992, 589:194-206.
25. Fox M.A., Panessiti M.G., Hall F.S., Uhl G.R., Murphy D.L. An evaluation of the serotonin system and perseverative, compulsive, stereotypical, and hyperactive behaviors in dopamine transporter (DAT) knockout mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013, 227:685-695.
26. Fray P.J., Sahakian B.J., Robbins T.W., Koob G.F., Iversen S.D. An observational method for quantifying the behavioural effects of dopamine agonists: contrasting effects of d-amphetamine and apomorphine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1980, 69:253-259.
27. Gut N.K., Winn P. The role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in motor disorders. Animal models of movement isorders 2011, 321-342. Elsevier, Amsterdam. E.L. Lane, S.B. Dunnett (Eds.).
28. Hajnal A., De Jonghe B.C., Covasa M. Dopamine D2 receptors contribute to increased avidity for sucrose in obese rats lacking CCK-1 receptors. Neuroscience 2007, 148:584-592.
29. Hong S., Hikosaka O. Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons provide reward, sensorimotor, and alerting signals to midbrain dopamine neurons. Neuroscience 2014.
30. Humphries M.D., Prescott T.J. The ventral basal ganglia, a selection mechanism at the crossroads of space, strategy, and reward. Progr Neurobiol 2010, 90:385-417.
31. Inglis W.L., Allen L.F., Whitelaw R.B., Latimer M.P., Brace H.M., Winn P. An investigation into the role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in the mediation of locomotion and orofacial stereotypy induced by d-amphetamine and apomorphine in the rat. Neuroscience 1994, 58:817-833.
32. Inglis W.L., Olmstead M.C., Robbins T.W. Selective deficits in attentional performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions. Behav Brain Res 2001, 123:117-131.
33. Inglis W.L., Winn P. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: where the striatum meets the reticular formation. Prog Neurobiol 1995, 47:1-29.
34. Keating G.L., Walker S.C., Winn P. An examination of the effects of bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus on responding to sucrose reward. Behav Brain Res 2002, 134:217-228.
35. Keating G.L., Winn P. Examination of the role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in radial maze tasks with or without a delay. Neuroscience 2002, 112:687-696.
36. Keeler J.F., Pretsell D.O., Robbins T.W. Functional implications of dopamine D1 vs D2 receptors: a 'Prepare and Select' model of the striatal direct vs indirect pathways. Neuroscience 2014.
37. Kita T., Kita H. Cholinergic and non-cholinergic mesopontine tegmental neurons projecting to the subthalamic nucleus in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 2011, 33:433-443.
38. Kobayashi Y., Inoue Y., Yamamoto M., Isa T., Aizawa H. Contribution of pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons to performance of visually guided saccade tasks in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:715-731.
39. Lydall E.S., Gilmour G., Dwyer D.M. Analysis of licking microstructure provides no evidence for a reduction in reward value following acute or sub-chronic phencyclidine administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010, 209:153-162.
40. MacLaren D.A., Santini J.A., Russell A.L., Markovic T., Clark S.D. Deficits in motor performance after pedunculopontine lesions in rats - impairment depends on demands of task. Eur J Neurosci 2014.
41. Maclaren D.A., Wilson D.I., Winn P. Updating of action-outcome associations is prevented by inactivation of the posterior pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2013, 102:28-33.
42. Martinez-Gonzalez C., Bolam J.P., Mena-Segovia J. Topographical organization of the pedunculopontine nucleus. Front Neuroanat 2011, 5:22.
43. McCutcheon J.E., Beeler J.A., Roitman M.F. Sucrose-predictive cues evoke greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin-predictive cues. Synapse 2012, 66:346-351.
44. McCutcheon J.E., Ebner S.R., Loriaux A.L., Roitman M.F. Encoding of aversion by dopamine and the nucleus accumbens. Front Neurosci 2012, 6:137.
45. Mena-Segovia J., Bolam J.P., Magill P.J. Pedunculopontine nucleus and basal ganglia: distant relatives or part of the same family?. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27:585-588.
46. Mena-Segovia J., Winn P., Bolam J.P. Cholinergic modulation of midbrain dopaminergic systems. Brain Res Rev 2008, 58:265-271.
47. Menani J.V., De Luca L.A., Johnson A.K. Role of the lateral parabrachial nucleus in the control of sodium appetite. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2014, 306:R201-R210.
48. Mietlicki E.G., Daniels D. Ghrelin reduces hypertonic saline intake in a variety of natriorexigenic conditions. Exp Physiol 2011, 96:1072-1083.
49. Miller A.D., Forster G.L., Metcalf K.M., Blaha C.D. Excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine differentially mediate morphine- and d-amphetamine-evoked striatal dopamine efflux and behaviors (vol. 111, pg. 351, 2002). Neuroscience 2002, 113. 1015-1015.
50. Norton A.B., Jo Y.S., Clark E.W., Taylor C.A., Mizumori S.J. Independent neural coding of reward and movement by pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons in freely navigating rats. Eur J Neurosci 2011, 33:1885-1896.
51. Okada K., Toyama K., Inoue Y., Isa T., Kobayashi Y. Different pedunculopontine tegmental neurons signal predicted and actual task rewards. J Neurosci 2009, 29:4858-4870.
52. Olmstead M.C., Franklin K.B. Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus block drug-induced reinforcement but not amphetamine-induced locomotion. Brain Res 1994, 638:29-35.
53. Olmstead M.C., Inglis W.L., Bordeaux C.P., Clarke E.J., Wallum N.P., Everitt B.J., Robbins T.W. Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus increase sucrose consumption but do not affect discrimination or contrast effects. Behav Neurosci 1999, 113:732-743.
54. Pan W.X., Hyland B.I. Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus controls conditioned responses of midbrain dopamine neurons in behaving rats. J Neurosci 2005, 25:4725-4732.
55. Paxinos G., Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates 2005, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
56. Rauhut A.S., Fenton L., Bardo M.T. Renewal of sucrose-seeking behavior in rats: Role of D(2) dopamine receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2010, 96:354-362.
57. Roitman M.F., Wheeler R.A., Wightman R.M., Carelli R.M. Real-time chemical responses in the nucleus accumbens differentiate rewarding and aversive stimuli. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11:1376-1377.
58. Rostron C.L., Farquhar M.J., Latimer M.P., Winn P. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: do both have a role in sustained attention?. BMC Neurosci 2008, 9:16.
59. Rots N.Y., Cools A.R., Berod A., Voorn P., Rostene W., de Kloet E.R. Rats bred for enhanced apomorphine susceptibility have elevated tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA and dopamine D2-receptor binding sites in nigrostriatal and tuberoinfundibular dopamine systems. Brain Res 1996, 710:189-196.
60. Savelieva K.V., Caudle W.M., Findlay G.S., Caron M.G., Miller G.W. Decreased ethanol preference and consumption in dopamine transporter female knock-out mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002, 26:758-764.
61. Scheggi S., Secci M.E., Marchese G., De Montis M.G., Gambarana C. Influence of palatability on motivation to operate for caloric and non-caloric food in non food-deprived and food-deprived rats. Neuroscience 2013, 236:320-331.
62. Schmidt R., Leventhal D.K., Mallet N., Chen F., Berke J.D. Canceling actions involves a race between basal ganglia pathways. Nat Neurosci 2013, 16:1118-1124.
63. Schultz W. The reward signal of midbrain dopamine neurons. News Physiol Sci 1999, 14:249-255.
64. Schultz W. Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data. Behav Brain Funct 2010, 6:24.
65. Semba K., Fibiger H.C. Afferent connections of the laterodorsal and the pedunculopontine tegmental nuclei in the rat: a retro- and antero-grade transport and immunohistochemical study. J Comp Neurol 1992, 323:387-410.
66. Smith C.F., Cutts S. Dopamine agonist activity of 8-OH-DPAT. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1990, 306:106-113.
67. Tandon S., Simon S.A., Nicolelis M.A. Appetitive changes during salt deprivation are paralleled by widespread neuronal adaptations in nucleus accumbens, lateral hypothalamus, and central amygdala. J Neurophysiol 2012, 108:1089-1105.
68. Taylor C.L., Kozak R., Latimer M.P., Winn P. Effects of changing reward on performance of the delayed spatial win-shift radial maze task in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesioned rats. Behav Brain Res 2004, 153:431-438.
69. Tonissaar M., Herm L., Rinken A., Harro J. Individual differences in sucrose intake and preference in the rat: circadian variation and association with dopamine D2 receptor function in striatum and nucleus accumbens. Neurosci Lett 2006, 403:119-124.
70. Walker S.C., Winn P. An assessment of the contributions of the pedunculopontine tegmental and cuneiform nuclei to anxiety and neophobia. Neuroscience 2007, 150:273-290.
71. Wang H.L., Morales M. Pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei contain distinct populations of cholinergic, glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 2009, 29:340-358.
72. Wilson D.I., MacLaren D.A., Winn P. Bar pressing for food: differential consequences of lesions to the anterior versus posterior pedunculopontine. Eur J Neurosci 2009, 30:504-513.
73. Wilson D.I.G., MacLaren D.A.A., Winn P. On the Relationships Between the Pedunculopontine Tegmental Nucleus, Corticostriatal Architecture, and the Medial Reticular Formation The Basal Ganglia IX 2009, Springer, New York, pp. 143-157.
74. Winn P. How best to consider the structure and function of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: evidence from animal studies. J Neurol Sci 2006, 248:234-250.