Updating of action-outcome associations is prevented by inactivation of the posterior pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Volumn 102, Issue , 2013, Pages 28-33

  MacLaren, Duncan A A ^a,b   Wilson, David I G ^b   Winn, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action outcome; Basal ganglia; Contingency degradation; Learning; Pedunculopontine; Rat

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN STEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; MALE; MICROINJECTION; NONHUMAN; PEDUNCULOPONTINE TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; GABA-A RECEPTOR AGONISTS; MALE; MUSCIMOL; PEDUNCULOPONTINE TEGMENTAL NUCLEUS; RATS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84876724828     PISSN: 10747427     EISSN: 10959564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alderson H.L., Jenkins T.A., Kozak R., Latimer M.P., Winn P. The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus on conditioned place preference to 4%, 12% and 20% sucrose solutions. Brain Research Bulletin 2001, 56:599-605.
2. Alderson H.L., Latimer M.P., Blaha C.D., Phillips A.G., Winn P. An examination of d-amphetamine self-administration in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus-lesioned rats. Neuroscience 2004, 125:349-358.
3. Charara A., Smith Y., Parent A. Glutamatergic inputs from the pedunculopontine nucleus to midbrain dopaminergic neurons in primates: Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin anterograde labeling combined with postembedding glutamate and GABA immunohistochemistry. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1996, 364:254-266.
4. Corbit L.H., Balleine B.W. The role of prelimbic cortex in instrumental conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 146:145-157.
5. Corbit L.H., Muir J.L., Balleine B.W. Lesions of mediodorsal thalamus and anterior thalamic nuclei produce dissociable effects on instrumental conditioning in rats. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 18:1286-1294.
6. Corbit L.H., Ostlund S.B., Balleine B.W. Sensitivity to instrumental contingency degradation is mediated by the entorhinal cortex and its efferents via the dorsal hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22:10976-10984.
7. Everitt B.J., Robbins T.W. Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: From actions to habits to compulsion. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1481-1489.
8. Keating G.L., Winn P. Examination of the role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in radial maze tasks with or without a delay. Neuroscience 2002, 112:687-696.
9. Lex B., Hauber W. Disconnection of the entorhinal cortex and dorsomedial striatum impairs the sensitivity to instrumental contingency degradation. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35:1788-1796.
10. Maskos U. The cholinergic mesopontine tegmentum is a relatively neglected nicotinic master modulator of the dopaminergic system: Relevance to drugs of abuse and pathology. British Journal of Pharmacology 2008, 153(Suppl 1):S438-S445.
11. Mena-Segovia J., Bolam J.P., Magill P.J. Pedunculopontine nucleus and basal ganglia: Distant relatives or part of the same family?. Trends in Neurosciences 2004, 27:585-588.
12. Miyazato H., Skinner R.D., Garcia-Rill E. Neurochemical modulation of the P13 midlatency auditory evoked potential in the rat. Neuroscience 1999, 92:911-920.
13. Murray G.K., Corlett P.R., Fletcher P.C. The neural underpinnings of associative learning in health and psychosis: How can performance be preserved when brain responses are abnormal?. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2010, 36:465-471.
14. Norton A.B., Jo Y.S., Clark E.W., Taylor C.A., Mizumori S.J. Independent neural coding of reward and movement by pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons in freely navigating rats. European Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 33:1885-1896.
15. Oakman S.A., Faris P.L., Kerr P.E., Cozzari C., Hartman B.K. Distribution of pontomesencephalic cholinergic neurons projecting to substantia nigra differs significantly from those projecting to ventral tegmental area. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:5859-5869.
16. Okada K., Nakamura K., Kobayashi Y. A neural correlate of predicted and actual reward-value information in monkey pedunculopontine tegmental and dorsal raphe nucleus during saccade tasks. Neural Plasticity 2011, 2011:579840.
17. Okada K., Toyama K., Inoue Y., Isa T., Kobayashi Y. Different pedunculopontine tegmental neurons signal predicted and actual task rewards. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:4858-4870.
18. Pan W.X., Hyland B.I. Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus controls conditioned responses of midbrain dopamine neurons in behaving rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:4725-4732.
19. Parker J.L., van der Kooy D. Tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus lesions do not block cocaine reward. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 1995, 52:77-83.
20. Paxinos G., Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2005, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.
21. Redgrave P., Gurney K., Reynolds J. What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals?. Brain Research Reviews 2008, 58:322-339.
22. Redgrave P., Vautrelle N., Reynolds J.N. Functional properties of the basal ganglia's re-entrant loop architecture: Selection and reinforcement. Neuroscience 2011, 198:138-151.
23. Schultz W. Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 2002, 36:241-263.
24. Schultz W., Dickinson A. Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:473-500.
25. Swerdlow N.R., Geyer M.A. Prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle in rats after lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Behavioral Neuroscience 1993, 107:104-117.
26. Turetsky B.I., Calkins M.E., Light G.A., Olincy A., Radant A.D., Swerdlow N.R. Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: The viability of selected candidate measures. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2007, 33:69-94.
27. Wilson, D. I. G., MacLaren, D. A. A., & Winn, P. (2009b). On the relationships between the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus, corticostriatal architecture, and the medial reticular formation. The basal Ganglia IX (pp. 143-157). New York: Springer.
28. Wilson D.I., MacLaren D.A.A., Winn P. Bar pressing for food: Differential consequences of lesions to the anterior versus posterior pedunculopontine. European Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 30:504-513.
29. Winn P. How best to consider the structure and function of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: Evidence from animal studies. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2006, 248:234-250.
30. Winn, P., Wilson, D. I. G., & Redgrave, P. (2010). Subcortical connections of the Basal Ganglia. In S. Heinz, & Y. T. Kuei (Eds.), Handbook of basal Ganglia structure and function (pp. 397-408). Academic Press.
31. Yin H.H., Ostlund S.B., Knowlton B.J., Balleine B.W. The role of the dorsomedial striatum in instrumental conditioning. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 22:513-523.
32. Zahm D.S., Williams E.A., Latimer M.P., Winn P. Ventral mesopontine projections of the caudomedial shell of the nucleus accumbens and extended amygdala in the rat: Double dissociation by organization and development. Journal of Comparative Neurology 2001, 436:111-125.