Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus increase sucrose consumption but do not affect discrimination or contrast effects

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 732-743

  Olmstead, Mary C ^a,b   Inglis, Wendy L ^a   Bordeaux, Chris P ^a   Clarke, Emily J ^a   Wallum, Nick P ^a   Everitt, Barry J ^a   Robbins, Trevor W ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN METABOLISM; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; GLUCOSE BRAIN LEVEL; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PONS; RAT; REWARD; TEGMENTUM;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CONSUMMATORY BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; LIMBIC SYSTEM; MALE; MOTIVATION; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; REWARD; SUCROSE; TEGMENTUM MESENCEPHALI;

EID: 0032886214     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.113.4.732     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen, L. F., & Winn, P. (1995). Excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus disinhibit orofacial behaviors stimulated by microinjections of d-amphetamine into rat ventrolateral caudate-putamen. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 262-274.
2. Bechara, A., Harrington, F., Nader, K., & van der Kooy, D. (1992). Neurobiology of motivation: Double dissociation of two motivational mechanisms mediating opiate reward in drug-naive versus drug-dependent animals. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 798-807.
3. Bechara, A., Nader, K., & van der Kooy, D. (1998). A two-separate-motivational-systems hypothesis of opioid addiction. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 59, 1-17.
4. Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1989). The tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus: A brainstem output of the limbic system critical for the conditioned place preferences produced by morphine and amphetamine. The Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 3400-3409.
5. Bechara, A., & van der Kooy, D. (1992). A single brainstem substrate mediates the motivational effects of both opiates and food in non-deprived rats but not in deprived rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 351-363.
6. Berendse, H. W., Groenewegen, H. J., & Lohman, A. H. M. (1992). Compartmental distribution of ventral striatal neurons projecting to the mesencephalon in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 2079-2103.
7. Buscher, W., Schugens, M., Wagner, U., & Huston, J. P. (1989). Interhemispheric relationship between lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation and the region of the nucleus tegmenti pedunculopontinus. Brain Research, 487, 321-334.
8. Chevalier, G., & Deniau, J. M. (1990). Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. Trends in Neuroscience, 13, 277-281.
9. Crespi, L. P. (1942). Quantitative variation in incentive and performance in the white rat. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 467-517.
10. Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Cherkauoui, J., LeMoal, M., & Simon, H. (1991). Learning disturbances following excitotoxin lesion of cholinergic pedunculo-pontine nucleus in the rat. Brain Research, 544, 126-132.
11. Dunbar, J. S., Hitchcock, K., Latimer, M., Rugg, E. L., Ward, N., & Winn, P. (1992). Excitotoxin lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus of the rat. II: Examination of eating and drinking, rotation, and reaching and grasping following unilateral ibotenate or quinolinate lesions. Brain Research, 589, 194-206.
12. Flaherty, C. F. (1982). Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 409-440.
13. Garcia-Rill, E., Houser, C. R., Skinner, R. D., Smith, W., & Woodward, D. J. (1987). Locomotion-inducing sites in the vicinity of the pedunculopontine nucleus. Brain Research Bulletin, 18, 731-738.
14. Groenewegen, H. J., Berendse, H. W., & Haber, S. N. (1993). Organization of the output of the ventral striatopallidal system in the rat: Ventral pallidal efferents. Neuroscience, 57, 113-142.
15. Inglis, W. L., Allen, L. F., Whitelaw, R. B., Latimer, M., Brace, H. M., & Winn, P. (1994). An investigation into the role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in the mediation of locomotion and orofacial stereotypy induced by amphetamine and apomorphine in the rat. Neuroscience, 58, 817-833.
16. Inglis, W. L., Dunbar, J. S., & Winn, P. (1994). Outflow from the nucleus accumbens to the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: A dissociation between locomotor activity and the acquisition of responding for conditioned reinforcement stimulated by d-amphetamine. Neuroscience, 62, 51-64.
17. Inglis, W. L., Olmstead, M. C., & Robbins, T. W. (1999). Pedunculopontine lesions impair Pavlovian learning in appetitive visual autoshaping paradigms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Inglis, W. L., & Semba, K. (1996). Expression of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits with NADPH-diaphorase-containing neurons in the mesopontine tegmentum. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 368, 17-32.
19. Inglis, W. L., & Winn, P. (1995). The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: Where the striatum meets the reticular formation. Progress in Neuerobiology, 47, 1-29.
20. Joyce, E. M., & Iversen, S. D. (1984). Dissociable effects of 6-OHDA-induced lesions of neostriatum on anorexia, locomotor activity and stereotypy: The role of behavioral competition. Psychopharmacology, 83, 363-366.
21. Kessler, J., Markowitsch, H. J., & Sigg, G. (1986). Memory related role of the posterior cholinergic system. International Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 101-119.
22. Klitenick, M. A., & Kalivas, P. W. (1994). Behavioral and neurochemical studies of opioid effects in the pedunculopontine nucleus and mediodorsal thalamus. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 269, 437-448.
23. Kofman, O., McGlynn, S. M., Olmstead, M. C., & Yeomans, J. S. (1990). Differential effects of atropine, procaine and dopamine in the rat ventral tegmentum on lateral hypothalamic rewarding brain stimulation. Behavioural Brain Research, 38, 55-68.
24. Kofman, O., & Yeomans, J. S. (1989). Cholinergic antagonists in ventral tegmentum elevate thresholds for lateral hypothalamic and brainstem self-stimulation. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 31, 547-559.
25. Lepore, M., & Franklin, K. B. J. (1996). N-methyl-D-aspartate lesions of the pedunculopontine nucleus block acquisition and impair maintenance of responding reinforced with brain stimulation. Neuroscience, 71, 147-155.
26. Mogenson, G. J. (1987). Limbic-motor integration. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, 12, 117-170.
27. Mogenson, G. J. (1990). Brainstem systems for the control of behavioral acts. In W. R. Klemm & R. P. Vertes (Eds.), Brainstem mechanisms of behavior (pp. 171-195). New York: Wiley.
28. Mogenson, G. J., Jones, D. L., & Yim, C. Y. (1980). From motivation to action: Functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system. Progress in Neurobiology, 14, 69-97.
29. Morizumi, T., & Hattori, T. (1992). Separate neuronal populations of the rat globus pallidus projecting to the subthalamic nucleus, auditory cortex and pedunculopontine tegmental area. Neuroscience, 46, 701-710.
30. Nader, K., Bechara, A., Roberts, D. C. S., & van der Kooy, D. (1994). Neuroleptics block high-but not low-dose heroin place preferences: Further evidence for a two-system model of motivation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 1128-1138.
31. Oakman, S. A., Paris, P. L., Kerr, P. E., Cozzari, C., & Hartman, B. K. (1995). Distribution of pontomesencephalic cholinergic neurons projecting to substantia nigra differs significantly from those projecting to ventral tegmental area. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 5859-5869.
32. Olmstead, M. C., Eramian, D. R., Purdy, D. A., & Franklin, K. B. J. (1995). Effects of PPTg lesions on responding for sucrose reward on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 21, 449.
33. Olmstead, M. C., & Franklin, K. B. J. (1993). Effects of pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions on morphine-induced conditioned place preference and analgesia in the formalin test. Neuroscience, 57, 411-418.
34. Olmstead, M. C., & Franklin, K. B. J. (1994a). Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus abolish catalepsy and locomotor depression induced by morphine. Brain Research, 662, 134-140.
35. Olmstead, M. C., & Franklin, K. B. J. (1994b). Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus block drug-induced reinforcement but not amphetamine-induced locomotion. Brain Research, 638, 29-35.
36. Olmstead, M. C., Munn, E. M., Franklin, K. B. J., & Wise, R. A. (1998). Effects of pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions on responding for intravenous heroin under different schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 5035-5044.
37. Parker, J. L., & van der Kooy, D. (1995). Tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus lesions do not block cocaine reward. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 51, 77-83.
38. Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1986). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
39. Riley, E. P., & Dunlap, W. P. (1979). Successive negative contrast as a function of deprivation condition following shifts in sucrose concentration. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 59-70.
40. Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1992). Functions of dopamine in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 4, 119-127.
41. Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1996). Neurobehavioral mechanisms of reward and motivation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 228-236.
42. Rugg, E. L., Dunbar, J. S., Latimer, M., & Winn, P. (1992). Comparison of the neurotoxic properties of various excitotoxins in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus of the rat, with particular reference to the loss of immunohistochemically identified cholinergic neurons. Brain Research, 589, 1-13.
43. Shik, M. L., Severin, F. V., & Orlovsky, G. N. (1966). Control of walking and running by means of electrical stimulation of the mid-brain. Biophysics, 11, 756-765.
44. Spann, B. M., & Grofova, I. (1991). Nigropedunculopontine projection in the rat: An anterograde tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). Journal of Comparative Neurology, 311, 375-388.
45. Stefaruk, T. L., & van der Kooy, D. (1994). Tegmental pedunculopontine lesions in rats decrease saccharin's rewarding effects but not its memory-improving effect. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 972-980.
46. Sugimoto, T., & Hatten, T. (1984). Organization and efferent projections of nucleus tegmenti pedunculopontinus pars compacta with special reference to its cholinergic aspects. Neurocience, 11, 931-946.
47. Swanson, L. W., & Cowan, W. M. (1975). A note on the connections and development of the nucleus accumbens. Brain Research, 92, 324-330.
48. Swanson, L. W., Mogenson, G. J., Gerfen, C. R., & Robinson, P. (1984). Evidence for a projection from the lateral preoptic area and substantia innominata to the mesencephalic locomotor region in the rat. Brain Research, 295, 161-178.
49. Waraczynski, M., & Shizgal, P. (1995). Self-stimulation of the MFB following parabrachial lesion. Physiology and Behavior, 58, 559-566.
50. Wise, R. A., & Rompré, P. P. (1989). Brain dopamine and reward. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 191-225.
51. Yeomans, J. S., Kofman, O., & McFarlane, V. (1985). Cholinergic involvement in lateral hypothalamic rewarding brain stimulation. Brain Research, 329, 19-26.
52. Yeomans, J. S., Mathur, A., & Tampakeras, M. (1993). Rewarding brain stimulation: Role of tegmental cholinergic neurons that activate dopamine neurons. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 1077-1087.