Riding the practice waves: Social resourcing practices during new venture development

Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1207-1235

  Keating, Andrew ^a   Geiger, Susi ^a   Mcloughlin, Damien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908503646     PISSN: 10422587     EISSN: 15406520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/etap.12038     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adler, P. & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Aldrich, H. & Fiol, C.M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
3. Aldrich, H. & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton & R. Smilar (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23). New York: Ballinger.
4. Anderson, A.R., Dodd, S.D., & Jack, S. (2010). Network practices and entrepreneurial growth. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(2), 121-133.
5. Antcliff, V., Saundry, R., & Stuart, M. (2007). Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties. Human Relations, 60(2), 371-393.
6. Araujo, L. & Easton, G. (1999). Social capital as a relational resource. In R. Leenders & S. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 68-87). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Baker, T. (2007). Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 694-711.
8. Baker, T., Miner, A.S., & Eesley, D.T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-276.
9. Baker, T. & Nelson, R. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
10. Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107-117.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Callagher, L. (2012). Searching near and far: A practice perspective of knowledge access in emerging clusters. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 15(1-2), 4-28.
13. Collins, H.M. (2001). What is tacit knowledge? In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 107-119). London: Routledge.
14. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265-283.
15. Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773-791.
16. Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
17. De Carolis, D., Litzky, B., & Eddleston, K. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 527-545.
18. De Carolis, D. & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 41-56.
19. De Clerq, D. & Voronov, M. (2009). Toward a practice perspective of entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 27(4), 395-419.
20. Delmar, F. & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385-410.
21. Desa, G. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727-751.
22. Doganova, L. & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570.
23. Drori, I., Honig, B., & Sheaffer, Z. (2009). The life cycle of an Internet firm: Scripts, legitimacy, and identity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 715-738.
24. Dyer, W.G. & Wilkins, A.L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theories: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613-619.
25. Feldman, M.S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295-309.
26. Feldman, M.S. & Orlikowski, W.J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253.
27. Feldman, M.S. & Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
28. Feldman, M.S. & Quick, K.S. (2009). Generating resources and energizing frameworks through inclusive public management. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 137-171.
29. Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019-1051.
30. Gargiulo, M. & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196.
31. Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
32. Geiger, D. (2009). Revisiting the concept of practice: Toward an argumentative understanding of practices. Management Learning, 40(2), 129-144.
33. Geiger, S., Kjellberg, H., & Spencer, R. (2012). Shaping exchanges, building markets. Consumption Markets and Culture, 15(2), 133-148.
34. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 161-178.
35. Higgins, M.C. & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting offto a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244-263.
36. Hite, J. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 113-144.
37. Hite, J.H. & Hesterly, W.S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275-286.
38. Howard-Grenville, J.A. (2007). Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organization Science, 18(4), 560-577.
39. Jarillo, J.C. (1989). Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 133-147.
40. Jarzabkowski, P. & Spee, A.P. (2009). Strategy as practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69-95.
41. Johannisson, B. (1990). Economies of overview-guiding the external growth of small firms. International Small Business Journal, 9(1), 32-44.
42. Johannisson, B. (2011). Towards a practice theory of entrepreneuring. Small Business Economics, 36(2), 135-150.
43. Keating, A. & McLoughlin, D. (2010). The entrepreneurial imagination and the impact of context on the development of a new venture. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(6), 996-1009.
44. Larson, A. & Starr, J. (1993). A network model of organizational formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 5-15.
45. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Lounsbury, M. & Crumley, E.T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012.
47. Mason, K. & Spring, M. (2011). The sites and practices of business models. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 1032-1041.
48. Mosey, S., Lockett, A., & Westhead, P. (2006). Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: The Medici fellowship scheme. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(1), 71-91.
49. Mosey, S. & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909-935.
50. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
51. Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391-1418.
52. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
53. Portes, A. & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
54. Quinn, R.W. & Worline, M.C. (2008). Enabling courageous collective action: Conversations from United Airlines flight 93. Organization Science, 19(4), 497-516.
55. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.
56. Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
57. Schatzki, T. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484.
58. Schatzki, T. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863-1873.
59. Shane, S. & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364-382.
60. Shane, S. & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-171.
61. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20-24.
62. Star, S.L. & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
63. Steen, J. (2010). Actor-network theory and the dilemma of the resource concept in strategic management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(3), 324-331.
64. Steyaert, C. (2007). "Entrepreneuring" as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(6), 453-477.
65. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structure and organization. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
66. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
67. Stuart, T., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315-349.
68. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
69. Terjesen, S. & Elam, A. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurs' venture internationalization strategies: A practice theory approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1093-1120.
70. Van de Ven, A.H. & Engleman, R. (2004). Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 343-358.
71. Van de Ven, A.H. & Poole, S.M. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 29(6), 1377-1404.
72. Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout ventures. Research Policy, 33(1), 147-175.
73. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
74. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Decisions, actions, and performance: Do novice, serial, and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? Journal of Small Business Management, 43(4), 393-417.
75. Zimmerman, M. & Zeitz, G. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431.