The entrepreneurial imagination and the impact of context on the development of a new venture

Industrial Marketing Management

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 996-1009

  Keating, Andrew ^a   McLoughlin, Damien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Context and institutionalized decision criteria; Entrepreneurial imagination; Life sciences; Loasby; New venture development

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955328521     PISSN: 00198501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aldrich H. Organizations Evolving 1999, Sage Publications, London.
2. Aldrich H., Matinez M. Many are called, but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2001, 25(4):41-56.
3. Aldrich H., Ruef M. Organizations Evolving 2006, Sage Publications, London. Revised Edition.
4. Arksey H., Knight P. Interviewing for Social Scientists 1999, Sage, London.
5. Ayvari A., Moller K. Entrepreneurial Networking-Dealing with People. 16th IMP Conference, Bath, England 2000.
6. Baron R. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: how entrepreneurs "connect the dots" to identify new business ventures. Academy of Management Perspectives 2006, 20(1):174-192.
7. Baron R., Ensley M. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from the comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science 2006, 52(9):1331-1344.
8. BCC Report Opportunities in Chiral Technology: Updated Edition. BCC Industry Report 2000.
9. Bird B. The operation of intentions in time: the emergence of the new venture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1992, 17(1):11-20.
10. Bowey J., Easton G. Net social capital processes. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 2007, 22(3):171-177.
11. Brush C., Greene P., Hart M. From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Perspectives 2001, 15(1):64-78.
12. D&MD Report Chiral Technologies: Commercial Opportunities of Today and the Future 2003, Drug &Market Development Publishing.
13. Delmar F., Shane S. Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19(3):385-410.
14. Drori I., Honig H., Sheaffer Z. The lifecycle of an internet firm: scripts, legitimacy, & identity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2009, 33(3):715-738.
15. Dutta D., Thornhill S. The evolution of growth intentions: toward a cognition based model". Journal of Business Venturing 2008, 23(3):307-332.
16. Dyer W.G., Wilkins A.L. Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theories: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review 1991, 16(3):613-619.
17. Easton G. Methodology and industrial networks. Business Marketing: An Interaction and Network Perspective 1995, 411-492. Norwell, Mass., Kluwer. K. Moller, D.T. Wilson (Eds.).
18. Easton G. Marketing: a critical realist approach. Journal of Business Research 2002, 55(2):103-106.
19. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14(4):532-550.
20. Eisenhardt K.M. Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review 1991, 16(3):620-627.
21. Garnsey E. The growth of new ventures: analysis after Penrose. The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose 2002, 101-125. Oxford University Press. C. Pitelis (Ed.).
22. Gartner W.B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review 1985, 10(4):695-705.
23. Guercini S., Rafagni S. The Role of Bureau de Style in the Entrepreneurial Network for Textile Product Innovation. 19th IMP Conference, Lugano, Switzerland 2003.
24. Developing Relationships in Business Networks 1995, Routledge, London. H. Håkansson, I. Snehota (Eds.).
25. Hall J.C., Hofer H. Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing 1993, 8(1):25-42.
26. Hanks S., Watson C., Jansen E., Chandler G. Tightening the life-cycle construct: a taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1993, 18(2):5-30.
27. Helfat C.M., Lieberman The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change 2002, 11(4):725-758.
28. Hellman T., Puri M. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 2002, LVII(1):169-197.
29. Hoang H., Antoncic B. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(2):165-187.
30. Honig B., Karlsson T. Institutional forces and the written business plan. Journal of Management 2004, 30(1):29-48.
31. ICTSI Technology foresight: Ireland health and life science panel. Forfas Report 1999, April.
32. Karlsson T., Honig B. Judging a business by its cover: an institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan. Journal of Business Venturing 2009, 24(1):27-45.
33. Kor Y., Mahoney J. Penrose's resource-based approach: the process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies 2000, 37(1):109-139.
34. Kor Y., Mahoney J., Michael S. "Resources capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 44(7):1187-1212.
35. Lichtenstein B., Brush C. How do "resource bundles" develop and change in new ventures: a dynamic model and longitudinal exploration. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2001, 25(3):37-58.
36. Loasby B. The organisation of capabilities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1998, 35(2):139-160.
37. Loasby B. The concept of capabilities. Economic Organization, Capabilities and Co-Ordination: Essays in honour of G.B. Richardson 1998, 163-181. Routledge. B. Loasby, N. Foss (Eds.).
38. Loasby B. Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics 1999, Routledge, London.
39. Loasby B. Market institution and economic evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2000, 10(3):297-309.
40. Loasby B. Cognition, imagination, and institutions in demand creation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2001, 11(1):7-21.
41. Loasby B. Time, knowledge and evolutionary dynamics: why connections matter. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2001, 11(4):393-412.
42. Lockhardt A., Thompson S. Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view: an alternative perspective. Journal of Management Studies 2004, 41(1):193-203.
43. Low M., McMillan I. Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenge. Journal of Management 1988, 14(2):139-161.
44. Mainela T., Puhakka V. Role of Networks in Emergence of International New Ventures. 22nd IMP Conference, Milan, Italy 2006.
45. McCracken G.D. The Long Interview 1988, Sage, Beverly Hills.
46. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods 1994, Sage Publications.
47. Ozgen E., Baron R. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing 2007, 22(2):174-192.
48. Penrose E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm 1959, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose 2002, Oxford University Press. C. Pitelis (Ed.).
50. Roche W.K. Selecting case studies in business research. Business Research Methods 1997, 97-138. Oak Tree Press, Dublin. T. Brannick, W. Roche (Eds.).
51. Ropo A., Hunt J.G. Entrepreneurial processes: virtuous and vicious spirals in a changing opportunity structure. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice 1995, 19(3):91-111.
52. Schoonhoven C.B., Eisenhardt K., Lyman K. Speeding products to market: waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35(1):177-207.
53. Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Organization Science 2000, 11(4):448-469.
54. Shane S., Cable D. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science 2002, 48(3):364-381.
55. Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 2000, 25(1):217-226.
56. Shepherd D. Venture capitalists' assessment of new venture survival. Management Science 1999, 45(5):621-632.
57. Shepherd D., Ettenson R., Crouch A. New venture strategy and profitability: a venture capitalist's assessment. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(5-6):449-467.
58. Stake R. Case Studies. Handbook of Qualitative Research 2000, 435-454. Sage, London. N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.).
59. Stinchcombe A.L. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations 1965, 142-194. Rand-McNally&Co, Chicago. J.G. March (Ed.).
60. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 1990, Sage, London.
61. Stuart T., Hoang H., Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44(2):315-349.
62. Suchman M. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-610.
63. Van de Ven A.H., Angle H.L., Poole M.S. Research on the Management of Innovations 1989, Harper and Row, New York.
64. Vohora A., Wright M., Lockett A. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout ventures. Research Policy 2004, January, 33:147-175.
65. Witt U. Imagination and leadership. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1998, 35(2):161-177.
66. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1994, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
67. Zacharakis A.L., Meyer G.D. The potential of actuarial decision models: can they improve the venture capitalist investment decisions. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(4):305-323.
68. Zimmerman M., Zeitz G. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review 2002, 27(3):414-431.