The high-capacity specific fructose facilitator ZrFfz1 is essential for the fructophilic behavior of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii CBS 732T

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1371-1379

  Leandro, Maria José ^a,b   Cabral, Sara ^b   Prista, Catarina ^b   Loureiro Dias, Maria C ^b   Sychrová, Hana ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZYGOSACCHAROMYCES ROUXII;

FRUCTOSE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLUCOSE;

CELL PROLIFERATION; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE SILENCING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL; ZYGOSACCHAROMYCES;

BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CELL PROLIFERATION; FERMENTATION; FRUCTOSE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; GLUCOSE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ZYGOSACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 84908339985     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00137-14     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Martorell P, Stratford M, Steels H, Fernández-Espinar MT, Querol A. 2007. Physiological characterization of spoilage strains of Zygosaccharo-myces bailii and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii isolated from high sugar environments. Int. J.Food Microbiol. 114:234–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.014.
2. Dakal TC, Solieri L, Giudici P. 2014. Adaptive response and tolerance to sugar and salt stress in the food yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 185:140–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.05.015.
3. Deák T. 2007. Yeasts in specific types of foods, p 117–201. In Deák T (ed), Handbook of food spoilage yeasts, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
4. Solieri L, Giudici P. 2008. Yeasts associated to traditional balsamic vinegar: ecological and technological features. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 125: 36–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.022.
5. Emmerich W, Radler F. 1983. The anaerobic metabolism of glucose and fructose by Saccharomyces bailii. Microbiology 129:3311–3318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-129-11-3311.
6. Sols A. 1956. Selective fermentation and phosphorylation of sugars by sauternes yeast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 20:62–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3002(56)90263-3.
7. Eddy AA, Barnett JA. 2007. A history of research on yeasts. 11. The study of solute transport: the first 90 years, simple and facilitated diffusion. Yeast 24:1023–1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1572.
8. Saier MH, Jr. 2000. Families of transmembrane sugar transport proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 35:699–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01759.x.
9. Leandro MJ, Fonseca C, Gonçalves P. 2009. Hexose and pentose transport in ascomycetous yeasts: an overview. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:511–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00509.x.
10. Sousa-Dias S, Gonçalves T, Leyva JS, Peinado JM, Loureiro-Dias MC. 1996. Kinetics and regulation of fructose and glucose transport systems are responsible for fructophily in Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Microbiology 142: 1733–1738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/13500872-142-7-1733.
11. Sousa-Dias S. 2000. Ph.D. thesis. Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. Pina C, Gonçalves P, Prista C, Loureiro-Dias MC. 2004. Ffz1, a new transporter specific for fructose from Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Microbiology 150:2429–2433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic0.26979-0.
12. Leandro MJ, Sychrová H, Prista C, Loureiro-Dias MC. 2011. The os-motolerant fructophilic yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii employs two plasma-membrane fructose uptake systems belonging to a new family of yeast sugar transporters. Microbiology 157:601–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.044446-0.
13. Lee DH, Kim SJ, Seo JH. 2014. Molecular cloning and characterization of two novel fructose-specific transporters from the osmotolerant and fructophilic yeast Candida magnoliae JH110. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98: 3569–3578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5225-y.
14. Mira NP, Münsterkötter M, Dias-Valada F, Santos J, Palma M, Roque FC, Guerreiro JF, Rodrigues F, Sousa MJ, Leão C, Guldener U, Sá-Correia I. 2014. The genome sequence of the highly acetic acid-tolerant Zygosaccharomyces bailii-derived interspecies hybrid strain ISA1307, isolated from a sparkling wine plant. DNA Res. 21:299–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst058.
15. Galeote V, Bigey F, Devillers H, Neuveglise C, Dequin S. 2013. Genome sequence of the food spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii CLIB 213. Genome Announc. 1:e00606–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00606-13.
16. +symporter from fructophilic yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. PLoS One 8:e68165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068165.
17. Pribylová L, Straub ML, Sychrová H, de Montigny J. 2007. Characterisation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii centromeres and construction of first Z. rouxii centromeric vectors. Chromosome Res. 15:439–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-007-1136-z.
18. Pribylová L, Sychrová H. 2003. Efficient transformation of the osmotolerant yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii by electroporation. J. Microbiol. Methods 55:481–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00197-0.
19. Pribylová L, de Montigny J, Sychrová H. 2007. Tools for the genetic manipulation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. FEMS Yeast Res. 7:1285–1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00308.x.
20. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH. 1996. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2519–2524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/24.13.2519.
21. Marešová L, Sychrová H. 2007. Applications of a microplate reader in yeast physiology research. Biotechniques 43:667–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/000112620.
22. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
23. Hoffman CS, Winston F. 1987. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 57:267–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4.
24. Zaragoza O.2003. Generation of disruption cassettes in vivo using a PCR product and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Microbiol. Methods 52:141–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00154-9.
25. +antiporters. J. Biol. Chem. 280:30638–30647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M506341200.
26. Jones GV, White MA, Cooper OR, Storchmann K. 2005. Climate change and global wine quality. Climatic Change 73:319–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-4704-2.
27. Berthels NJ, Cordero Otero RR, Bauer FF, Thevelein JM, Pretorius IS. 2004. Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 4:683–689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.02.005.
28. Bisson LF. 1999. Stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:107–119.
29. Salmon JM. 1989. Effect of sugar transport inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on sluggish and stuck enological fermentations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:953–958.
30. Palma M, Seret ML, Baret PV. 2009. Combined phylogenetic and neighbourhood analysis of the hexose transporters and glucose sensors in yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:526–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00511.x.
31. Yu JH, Lee DH, Oh YJ, Han KC, Ryu YW, Seo JH. 2006. Selective utilization of fructose to glucose by Candida magnoliae, an erythritol producer. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 131:870–879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:131:1:870.
32. Yu JH, Lee DH, Park YC, Lee MG, Kim DO, Ryu YW, Seo JH. 2008. Proteomic analysis of fructophilic properties of osmotolerant Candida magnoliae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18:248–254.
33. Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles JM, Blondin B. 2007. Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Appl. Environ. Mi-crobiol. 73:2432–2439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02269-06.