Condition grading for dysfunction indicators in sewer asset management

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 346-358

  Ahmadi, Mehdi ^a,b   Cherqui, Frédéric ^b,c   de Massiac, Jean Christophe ^a   Werey, Caty ^d   Lagoutte, Stéphane ^e   Le Gauffre, Pascal ^b,c  

^a G2C Environnement ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^d UMR GESTE   (France)

^e IRSTEA UMR GESTE ^*  (France)

Author keywords

assets; defect; inspection; rehabilitation; sewers and drains

Indexed keywords

ASSETS; CONDITION ASSESSMENTS; NUMERICAL VALUES; OVER-ESTIMATION; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; UTILITY MANAGERS; VISUAL INSPECTION; WATER AND WASTEWATER;

ASSET MANAGEMENT; DEFECTS; GRADING; INSPECTION; MANAGERS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

SEWERS;

EID: 84892476377     PISSN: 15732479     EISSN: 17448980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2012.756916     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AGHTM (1999). Les ouvrages d'assainissement non visitables: Fiches pathognomoniques. Techniques Sciences et Méthodes, 10, 23-90, October, (In French).
2. Alegre, H., Hirner, W., Baptista, J.M., & Parena, R. (2000). Performance indicators for water supply servicesIWA (International Water Association) manual of best practice. London: IWA Publishing.
3. Ana, E., & Bauwens, W. (2010). Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods. Urban Water Journal, 7(1), 47-59.
4. ATV-M 143 Teil 2 (1999). Inspektion, Instandsetzung, Sanierung und Erneuerung von Abwasserkanälen und leitungen - Teil 2: Optische Inspektion. Hennef: GFAApril 1999. ISBN 3-933693-43-8.
5. Cashman, A., Savic, D., Saul, A., Ashley, R., Walters, G., Blanksby, J., Djordjevic, S., Unwin, D., & Kapelan, Z. (2004). Whole life costing of sewers (Cost-S): Developing a sustainable approach to sewer network management. Proceedings Novatech. Lyon, France.
6. CEN (2003). EN 13508-2 Condition of drain and sewer systems outside buildings, Part 2: Visual inspection coding system, European norms.
7. Cherqui, F., Werey, C., Ibrahim, M., & Le Gauffre, P. (2008). CCTV inspection of sewer segments: Calibration of performance indicators based on experts' opinions. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage (Edinburgh, UK, August 31-September 5, p. 10.
8. Dirksen, J., Clemens, F.H.L.R., Korving, H., Cherqui, F., Le Gauffre, P., Ertl, T., Plihal, H., Müller, K., & Snaterse, C.T.M. (2013). The consistency of visual sewer inspection data. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(3), 214-228.
9. Ellis, J.B. & Bertrand-Krajewski, J.-L. (Eds.). (2006). Assessing infiltration and exfiltration on the performance of Urban Sewer Systems (APUSS)London: IWA Publishing, p. 192.
10. EN 752 (2008). Drain and sewer systems outside buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
11. Hahn, M., Palmer, R., Merrill, M., Andrew, B., & Lukas, A. (2002). Expert system for prioritizing the inspection of sewers: Knowledge base formulation and evaluation. ASCE, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 128(2), 121-129.
12. Ibrahim, M., Cherqui, F., Le Gauffre, P., & Werey, C. (2007). Sewer asset management: From visual inspection survey to dysfunction indicators. LESAM 2007 - 2nd IWA Leading Edge Conference on Strategic Asset ManagementProceeding on CD-Rom, Lisbon: International Water Association, October 17-19, p. 10.
13. Knolmar, M., & Szabo, G.C. (2003). CARE-S report D3 - WP2 Structural condition - classification systems based on visual inspection. Technical report of the CARE-S project, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, p. 192.
14. Leeflang, M.M., Moons, K.G., Reitsma, J.B., & Zwinderman, A.H. (2008). Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: Mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clinical Chemistry, 54, 729-737, [PMID:18258670].
15. Le Gauffre, P., & Cherqui, F. (2009). Sewer rehabilitation criteria evaluated by fusion of fuzzy indicators. LESAM 2009 - 3rd IWA Leading Edge Conference on Strategic Asset Management. Miami, US.
16. Le Gauffre, P., Joannis, C., Breysse, D., Gibello, C., & Desmulliez, J.J. (2004). Gestion patrimoniale des réseaux d'assainissement urbainsGuide méthodologique, Paris: Lavoisier Tec&DocISBN 27430-0748-6, p. 416.
17. Le Gauffre, P., Joannis, C., Vasconcelos, E., Breysse, D., Gibello, C., & Desmulliez, J.J. (2007). Performance indicators and multicriteria decision support for sewer asset management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 13(2), 105-114.
18. Marlow, D., & Burn, S. (2008). Effective use of condition assessment within asset management. Journal of the American Water Works Association, 100(1), 54-63.
19. Marlow, D., Heart, S., Burn, S., Urquhart, A., Gould, S., Anderson, M., Cook, S., Ambrose, M., Madin, B., & Fitzgerald, A. (2007). Condition assessment strategies and protocols for water and wastewater utility assetsWERF - Water Environment Research Foundation, London: IWA Publishing, p. 476.
20. Matos, R., Ashley, R.M., Cardoso, A., Molinari, A., Schulz, A., & Duarte, P. (2003). Performance indicators for wastewater services. London: International Water Association, ISBN: 1900222906.
21. Merrill, S., Lukas, A., Palmer, R.N., & Hahn, M.A. (2004). Development of a tool to prioritize sewer inspections. Technical report, WERF - Water Environment Research Foundation -123)
22. Rahman, S., & Vanier, D.J. (2004). MIIP Client Report: An evaluation of condition assessment protocols for sewer management, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
23. Saegrov, S. (Ed.). (2005). CARE-W: Computer aided rehabilitation for water networks (pp. 208. London: IWA Publishing.
24. Saegrov, S. (Ed.). (2006). CARE-S - computer aided rehabilitation for sewer and stormwater networks. London: IWA Publishing, ISBN: 1843391155, p. 140.
25. Vanier, D.J., & Rahman, S. (2004). MIIP Report: A primer on municipal infrastructure asset management. Client Report. NRC Institute for Research in Construction, p. 71.
26. Vanier, D.J., & Newton, L.A. (2006). MIIP Report: The state of Canadian sewers - analysis of asset inventory and condition. Client Report. NRC Institute for Research in Construction, p. 38.
27. Vanier, D.J., Newton, L.A., & Rahman, S. (2006). A framework for municipal infrastructure management for Canadian municipalities. Building Science Insight - Sustainable Infrastructure: Techniques, Tools & Guidelines, October 13, 14 cities across Canada, pp. 1-16.
28. Water Research Center (WRC) (2004). Sewerage rehabilitation manual (4th ed.). Wiltshire: WRC.
29. Werey, C., Cherqui, F., Ibrahim, M., & Le Gauffre, P. (2008). Sewer asset management tool: Dealing with experts' opinions. In Cabrera & Pardo (Ed.), Performance assessment of urban infrastructure services. Drinking water, waste water and solid waste. London: IWA Publishing, pp. 125-134.
30. Werey, C., Dorchies, D., & Mellac Beck, I. (2006). Sewer asset management: Assessing criteria for a multicriteria decision support on a county level data base. Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering. Montreal, June 14-16, pp. 886-895.