Innovative method for assessment of underground sewer pipe condition

Automation in Construction

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 479-488

  Koo, Dae Hyun ^a   Ariaratnam, Samuel T ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Lifecycle prediction modeling; Underground infrastructure; Utility inspection

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIPE; SEWER TUNNELS;

LIFECYCLE PREDICTION MODELING; UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE; UTILITY INSPECTION;

UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES;

EID: 33744506093     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. USEPA. The Clean Water and Drinking Water Gap Analysis (2002), United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/gapreport.pdf http://www.epa.gov/safewater/gapreport.pdf
2. ASCE, Report Card for America's Infrastructure 2003 Progress report (2004), http://www.asce.org/reportcard/.
3. Li D., and Haimes Y.Y. Optimal maintenance-related decision making for deteriorating water distribution systems. Water Resource Research vol. 28 (1992) 1053-1061
4. MacLeod C.W., Ariaratnam S.T., and Chua K. Evaluation of emergency response for sewer infrastructure management. Proceedings of the CSCE 28th Annual Conference (London, Ontario, 2000) (2000) 41-47
5. Ratliff A. An overview of current and developing technologies for pipe condition assessment. ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction (Baltimore, Maryland, 2003) (2003) 103-114
6. ASCE. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice vol. 92 (1994), Manhole Inspection and Rehabilitation, Reston, VA
7. N. Guercio, Assessment and Modeling of Large Diameter Lined Concrete Pipe, MS thesis, Del E. Webb School of Construction, Arizona State University (2002).
8. CEITEC, CERF innovation center serving the engineering and construction industries (CERF report: #40551): Evaluation of SSET: The Sewer Scanner and Evaluation Technology. CIETEC, Washington, DC, 2001.
9. Sinha S.K. State-of-the-art in sensor technologies for pipe inspection. ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction (Baltimore, Maryland, 2003) (2003) 1592-1602
10. Andrews M.E. Large diameter sewer condition assessment using combined sonar and CCTV equipment. APWA International Public Works Congress, NRCC/CPWA Seminar Series "Innovations in Urban Infrastructures" (Las Vegas, Nevada, 1998) (1998)
11. Makar J.M. Diagnostic techniques for sewer systems. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems vol. 5(2) (1999) 69-78
12. Meyer A.H., and Ledbetter W.B. Sulfuric acid attack on concrete sewer pipe. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division vol. 96(5) (1970), ASCE
13. Ameron International. Brochure: Amer-Plate® T-Lock® Price List (2002), Ameron International, Brea, CA
14. Ariaratnam S.T., El-Assaly A., and Yang Y. Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems vol. 7(4) (2001) 160-165
15. M.C. Dayton, Logistic regression analysis, in: (Department of Education, University of Maryland, 2004), http://www.education.umd.edu/EDMS/LRA/LRA.pdf.
16. Hosmer D.E., and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. (2000), John Wiley & Son, New York, NJ
17. Menard S. Quantitative Applications in the Social Science: Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. (2001), Sage Publication, Thousands Oaks, CA