Dynamic stability of sequential stimulus representations in adapting neuronal networks

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue OCT, 2014, Pages

  Duarte, Renato C F ^a,b,c   Morrison, Abigail ^a,b,d  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Asynchronous irregular states; Excitation inhibition balance; Online computation; Stimulus representation; Synaptic plasticity; Transient dynamics

Indexed keywords

ASYNCHRONOUS IRREGULAR STATES; ONLINE COMPUTATIONS; STIMULUS REPRESENTATION; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY; TRANSIENT DYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCITATION; IN VIVO STUDY; NEOCORTEX; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 84908253264     PISSN: 16625188     EISSN: 16625188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00124     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abbott, L., and Nelson, S. B. (2000). Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1178-1183. doi: 10.1038/81453
2. Abeles, M. (1991). Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex, 1st Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511574566
3. Belkin, M., and Niyogi, P. (2003). Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Comput. 15, 1373-1396. doi: 10.1162/089976603321780317
4. Bi, G.-Q., and Poo, M. M. (1998). Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci. 18, 10464-10472.
5. Braitenberg, V., and Schüz, A. (1998). Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity. Berlin: Springer.
6. Broome, B. M., Jayaraman, V., and Laurent, G. (2006). Encoding and decoding of overlapping odor sequences. Neuron 51, 467-482. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.018
7. Brosch, M., and Schreiner, C. E. (2000). Sequence sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 10, 1155-1167. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.12.1155
8. Brunel, N. (2000). Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8, 183-208. doi: 10.1023/A:1008925309027
9. Bruno, R. M., and Sakmann, B. (2006). Cortex is driven by weak but synchronously active thalamocortical synapses. Science 312, 1622-1627. doi: 10.1126/science.1124593
10. Buonomano, D. V., and Maass, W. (2009). State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 113-125. doi: 10.1038/nrn2558
11. Churchland, M., Yu, B., Sahani, M., and Shenoy, K. (2007). Techniques for extracting single-trial activity patterns from large-scale neural recordings. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 609-618. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.11.001
12. Cohen, M. R., and Maunsell, J. H. R. (2009). Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1594-1600. doi: 10.1038/nn.2439
13. Compte, A., Brunel, N., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., and Wang, X.-J. (2000). Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cereb. Cortex 10, 910-923. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.9.910
14. Dan, Y., and Poo, M. (2006). Spike timing-dependent plasticity: from synapse to perception. Physiol. Rev. 86, 1033-1048. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2005
15. Dan, Y., and Poo, M.-M. (2004). Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron 44, 23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.007
16. Destexhe, A. (2009). Self-sustained asynchronous irregular states and Up-Down states in thalamic, cortical and thalamocortical networks of nonlinear integrate-and-fire neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 27, 493-506. doi: 10.1007/s10827-009-0164-4
17. Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., Fellous, J.-M., and Sejnowski, T. (2001). Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo like activity in neocortical neurons. Neuroscience 107, 13-24. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00344-X
18. Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., and Paré, D. (2003). The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 739-751. doi: 10.1038/nrn1198
19. Gerstein, G. L., and Mandelbrot, B. (1964). Random walk models for the spike activity of a single neuron. Biophys. J. 4, 41-68. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(64)86768-0
20. Gewaltig, M.-O., and Diesmann, M. (2007). NEST (NEural simulation tool). Scholarpedia 2:1430. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.1430
21. Gustafsson, B., Wigström, H., Abraham, W. C., and Huang, Y. Y. (1987). Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus using depolarizing current pulses as the conditioning stimulus to single volley synaptic potentials. J. Neurosci. 7, 774-780.
22. Haider, B., Duque, A., Hasenstaub, A. R., and McCormick, D. A. (2006). Neocortical network activity in vivo is generated through a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition. J. Neurosci. 26, 4535-4545. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5297-05.2006
23. Hennequin, G., Vogels, T. P., and Gerstner, W. (2014). Optimal control of transient dynamics in balanced networks supports generation of complex movements. Neuron 82, 1394-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.045
24. Holmgren, C. D., and Zilberter, Y. (2001). Coincident spiking activity induces long-term changes in inhibition of neocortical pyramidal cells. J. Neurosci. 21, 8270-8277.
25. Koch, C. (2004). Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons Computational Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
26. Kremkow, J., Aertsen, A., and Kumar, A. (2010). Gating of signal propagation in spiking neural networks by balanced and correlated excitation and inhibition. J. Neurosci. 30, 15760-15768. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3874-10.2010
27. Kullmann, D. M., Moreau, A. W., Bakiri, Y., and Nicholson, E. (2012). Plasticity of inhibition. Neuron 75, 951-962. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.030
28. Kumar, A., Rotter, S., and Aertsen, A. (2008a). Conditions for propagating synchronous spiking and asynchronous firing rates in a cortical network model. J. Neurosci. 28, 5268-5280. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2542-07.2008
29. Kumar, A., Schrader, S., Aertsen, A., and Rotter, S. (2008b). The high-conductance state of cortical networks. Neural Comput. 20, 1-43. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.20.1.1
30. Kunkel, S., Diesmann, M., and Morrison, A. (2011). Limits to the development of feed-forward structures in large recurrent neuronal networks. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 4:160. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00160
31. Lamsa, K. P., Kullmann, D. M., and Woodin, M. A. (2010). Spike-timing dependent plasticity in inhibitory circuits. Front. Syn. Neurosci. 2:8. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00008
32. Legenstein, R., and Maass, W. (2007). Edge of chaos and prediction of computational performance for neural circuit models. Neural Netw. 20, 323-334. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.04.017
33. Lisman, J., and Spruston, N. (2005). Postsynaptic depolarization requirements for LTP and LTD: a critique of spike timing-dependent plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 839-841. doi: 10.1038/nn0705-839
34. Lisman, J., and Spruston, N. (2010). Questions about STDP as a general model of synaptic plasticity. Front. Syn. Neurosci. 2:140. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00140
35. Lu, J.-T., Li, C.-Y., Zhao, J.-P., Poo, M.-M., and Zhang, X.-H. (2007). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity of neocortical excitatory synapses on inhibitory interneurons depends on target cell type. J. Neurosci. 27, 9711-9720. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-07.2007
36. Lukoševicius, M., and Jaeger, H. (2009). Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training. Comput. Sci. Rev. 3, 127-149. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.005
37. Maass, W. (2010). "Liquid state machines: motivation, theory, and applications," in Computability in Context: Computation and Logic in the Real World, eds B. Cooper and A. Sorbi (London: Imperial College Press), 275-296.
38. Maass, W., Legenstein, R., and Bertschinger, N. (2005). Methods for estimating the computational power and generalization capability of neural microcircuits. Theor. Comput. Sci. 17, 865-872.
39. Maass, W., Natschlager, T., and Markram, H. (2002). Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput. 14, 1-27. doi: 10.1162/089976602760407955
40. Markram, H., Gerstner, W., and Sjöström, P. J. (2012). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: a comprehensive overview. Front. Syn. Neurosci. 4:2. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2012.00002
41. Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., and Sakmann, B. (1997). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275, 213-215. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5297.213
42. Matsumura, M., Chen, D., Sawaguchi, T., Kubota, K., and Fetz, E. E. (1996). Synaptic interactions between primate precentral cortex neurons revealed by spike-triggered averaging of intracellular membrane potentials in vivo. J. Neurosci. 16, 7757-7767.
43. Mazor, O., and Laurent, G. (2005). Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron 48, 661-673. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.032
44. Meffin, H., Burkitt, A. N., and Grayden, D. B. (2004). An analytical model for the "large, fluctuating synaptic conductance state" typical of neocortical neurons in vivo. J. Comput. Neurosci. 16, 159-175. doi: 10.1023/B:JCNS.0000014108.03012.81
45. Morrison, A., Diesmann, M., and Gerstner, W. (2008). Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing. Biol. Cybern. 98, 459-478. doi: 10.1007/s00422-008-0233-1
46. Morrison, A., Mehring, C., Geisel, T., Aertsen, A., and Diesmann, M. (2005). Advancing the boundaries of high-connectivity network simulation with distributed computing. Neural Comput. 17, 1776-1801. doi: 10.1162/0899766054026648
47. Ng, A., Jordan, M., and Weiss, Y. (2001). "On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm," in Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Cambridge), 849-856.
48. Ostojic, S. (2014). Two types of asynchronous activity in networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 594-600. doi: 10.1038/nn.3658
49. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825-2830.
50. Poulet, J. F. A., Fernandez, L. M. J., Crochet, S., and Petersen, C. C. H. (2012). Thalamic control of cortical states. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 370-372. doi: 10.1038/nn.3035
51. Rabinovich, M., Huerta, R., and Laurent, G. (2008). Transient dynamics for neural processing. Science 321:48. doi: 10.1126/science.1155564
52. Rabinovich, M., Varona, P., Selverston, A., and Abarbanel, H. (2006). Dynamical principles in neuroscience. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1213-1265. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1213
53. Rabinovich, M. I., and Varona, P. (2011). Robust transient dynamics and brain functions. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 5:24. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00024
54. Ramcharan, E. J., Gnadt, J. W., and Sherman, S. M. (2000). Burst and tonic firing in thalamic cells of unanesthetized, behaving monkeys. Vis. Neurosci. 17, 55-62. doi: 10.1017/S0952523800171056
55. Schapiro, A. C., Rogers, T. T., Cordova, N. I., Turk-Browne, N. B., and Botvinick, M. M. (2013). Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 486-492. doi: 10.1038/nn.3331
56. Shadlen, M., and Newsome, W. (1994). Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 569-579. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0
57. Shadlen, M. N., and Newsome, W. T. (1998). The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J. Neurosci. 18, 3870-3896.
58. Sherman, S. M. (2001a). A wake-up call from the thalamus. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 344-346. doi: 10.1038/85973
59. Sherman, S. M. (2001b). Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay. Trends Neurosci. 24, 122-126. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01714-8
60. Shouval, H. Z., Wang, S. S.-H., and Wittenberg, G. M. (2010). Spike timing dependent plasticity: a consequence of more fundamental learning rules. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 4:19. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00019
61. Shulz, D. E., and Jacob, V. (2010). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in the intact brain: counteracting spurious spike coincidences. Front. Syn. Neurosci. 2:137. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00137
62. Silver, M. A., and Kastner, S. (2009). Topographic maps in human frontal and parietal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 488-495. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.005
63. Singer, W. (2013). Cortical dynamics revisited. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 616-626. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.006
64. Sjöström, J., and Gerstner, W. (2010). Spike-timing dependent plasticity. Scholarpedia 5:1362. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.1362
65. Softky, W. R., and Koch, C. (1993). The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J. Neurosci. 13, 334-350.
66. Stiefel, K. M., Englitz, B., and Sejnowski, T. J. (2013). Origin of intrinsic irregular firing in cortical interneurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7886-7891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305219110
67. Tan, A. Y. Y., Chen, Y., Scholl, B., Seidemann, E., and Priebe, N. J. (2014). Sensory stimulation shifts visual cortex from synchronous to asynchronous states. Nature 509, 226-229. doi: 10.1038/nature13159
68. Tenenbaum, J. B., de Silva, V., and Langford, J. C. (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290, 2319-2323. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319
69. Thivierge, J.-P., and Marcus, G. F. (2007). The topographic brain: from neural connectivity to cognition. Trends Neurosci. 30, 251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.04.004
70. Tsodyks, M., and Sejnowski, T. (1995). Rapid state switching in balanced cortical network models. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 6, 111-124. doi: 10.1088/0954-898X/6/2/001
71. Tuckwell, H. C. (1988). Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology: Volume 1, Linear Cable Theory and Dendritic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Vaadia, E., and Aertsen, A. (1992). "Coding and computation in the cortex: single neuron activity and cooperative phenomena," in Information Processing in the Cortex: Experiments and Theory, eds A. Aertsen and V. Braitenberg (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 81-121.
73. van Rossum, M. C., Bi, G.-Q., and Turrigiano, G. G. (2000). Stable Hebbian learning from spike timing-dependent plasticity. J. Neurosci. 20, 8812-8821.
74. van Vreeswijk, C., and Sompolinsky, H. (1998). Chaotic balanced state in a model of cortical circuits. Neural Comput. 10, 1321-1371. doi: 10.1162/089976698300017214
75. Vogels, T. P., Froemke, R. C., Doyon, N., Gilson, M., Haas, J. S., Liu, R., et al. (2013). Inhibitory synaptic plasticity: spike timing-dependence and putative network function. Front. Neural Circuits 7:119. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00119
76. Vogels, T. P., Rajan, K., and Abbott, L. F. (2005). Neural network dynamics. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 357-376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135637
77. Vogels, T. P., Sprekeler, H., Zenke, F., Clopath, C., and Gerstner, W. (2011). Inhibitory plasticity balances excitation and inhibition in sensory pathways and memory networks. Science 334, 1569-1573. doi: 10.1126/science.1211095
78. von der Malsburg, C., Phillips, W., and Singer, W. (2010). Dynamic Coordination in the Brain: From Neurons to Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014717.001.0001
79. Wang, L., and Maffei, A. (2014). Inhibitory plasticity dictates the sign of plasticity at excitatory synapses. J. Neurosci. 34, 1083-1093. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4711-13.2014
80. Woodin, M. A., Ganguly, K., and Poo, M.-M. (2003). Coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity modifies GABAergic synapses by postsynaptic changes in Cl- transporter activity. Neuron 39, 807-820. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00507-5
81. Yger, P., El Boustani, S., Destexhe, A., and Frégnac, Y. (2011). Topologically invariant macroscopic statistics in balanced networks of conductance-based integrate-and-fire neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 31, 229-245. doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0310-z
82. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., and Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. Psychol. Bull. 133, 273-293. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
83. Zacks, J. M., and Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychol. Bull. 127, 3-21. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3