The potential utility of high-intensity ultrasound to treat osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1784-1799

  Nieminen, H J ^a   Salmi, A ^a   Karppinen, P ^a   Haeggstrom E ^a   Hacking, S A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone; Cartilage; Drug delivery; Orthopedic surgery; Osteoarthritis; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGENESIS; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HUMAN; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; TISSUE STRUCTURE; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; UTILIZATION;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 84908235692     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.025     Document Type: Review

References (153)

1. Buckwalter J.A., Martin J.A. Osteoarthritis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006, 58:150-167.
2. Pauli C., Whiteside R., Heras F.L., Nesic D., Koziol J., Grogan S.P., et al. Comparison of cartilage histopathology assessment systems on human knee joints at all stages of osteoarthritis development. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012, 20:476-485.
3. Frobell R.B., Le Graverand M.P., Buck R., Roos E.M., Roos H.P., Tamez-Pena J., et al. The acutely ACL injured knee assessed by MRI: changes in joint fluid, bone marrow lesions, and cartilage during the first year. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:161-167.
4. Lotz M.K., Kraus V.B. New developments in osteoarthritis. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: pathogenesis and pharmacological treatment options. Arthritis Res Ther 2010, 12:211.
5. Plaas A., Velasco J., Gorski D.J., Li J., Cole A., Christopherson K., et al. The relationship between fibrogenic TGFbeta1 signaling in the joint and cartilage degradation in post-injury osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:1081-1090.
6. Ackerman I.N., Graves S.E., Wicks I.P., Bennell K.L., Osborne R.H. Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 53:653-658.
7. Kotlarz H., Gunnarsson C.L., Fang H., Rizzo J.A. Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheum 2009, 60:3546-3553.
8. Woolf A.D., Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003, 81:646-656.
9. Brown T.D., Johnston R.C., Saltzman C.L., Marsh J.L., Buckwalter J.A. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. JOrthop Trauma 2006, 20:739-744.
10. Lohmander L.S., Ostenberg A., Englund M., Roos H. High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:3145-3152.
11. Chu C.R., Williams A.A., Coyle C.H., Bowers M.E. Early diagnosis to enable early treatment of pre-osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2012, 14:212.
12. Edmonds S. Therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis. Maturitas 2009, 63:191-194.
13. Nicholson S., Dickman K., Maradiegue A. Reducing premature osteoarthritis in the adolescent through appropriate screening. JPediatr Nurs 2009, 24:69-74.
14. Clouet J., Vinatier C., Merceron C., Pot-vaucel M., Maugars Y., Weiss P., et al. From osteoarthritis treatments to future regenerative therapies for cartilage. Drug Discov Today 2009, 14:913-925.
15. Sonntag R., Reinders J., Kretzer J.P. What's next? Alternative materials for articulation in total joint replacement. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:2434-2441.
16. Julkunen P., Kiviranta P., Wilson W., Jurvelin J.S., Korhonen R.K. Characterization of articular cartilage by combining microscopic analysis with a fibril-reinforced finite-element model. JBiomech 2007, 40:1862-1870.
17. Ateshian G.A., Lai W.M., Zhu W.B., Mow V.C. An asymptotic solution for the contact of two biphasic cartilage layers. JBiomech 1994, 27:1347-1360.
18. Becerra J., Andrades J.A., Guerado E., Zamora-Navas P., Lopez-Puertas J.M., Reddi A.H. Articular cartilage: structure and regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010, 16:617-627.
19. Maroudas A. Transport of solutes through cartilage: permeability to large molecules. JAnat 1976, 122:335-347.
20. Lu X.L., Mow V.C. Biomechanics of articular cartilage and determination of material properties. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:193-199.
21. Bajpayee A.G., Wong C.R., Bawendi M.G., Frank E.H., Grodzinsky A.J. Avidin as a model for charge driven transport into cartilage and drug delivery for treating early stage post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 2014, 35:538-549.
22. Pelletier J.P., Martel-Pelletier J. DMOAD developments: present and future. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2007, 65:242-248.
23. Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year 2010 in review: pharmacological therapies. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:361-365.
24. Lu Y.C., Evans C.H., Grodzinsky A.J. Effects of short-term glucocorticoid treatment on changes in cartilage matrix degradation and chondrocyte gene expression induced by mechanical injury and inflammatory cytokines. Arthritis Res Ther 2011, 13:R142.
25. Hunter D.J. Pharmacologic therapy for osteoarthritis - the era of disease modification. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2011, 7:13-22.
26. Chandran P.L., Horkay F. Aggrecan, an unusual polyelectrolyte: review of solution behavior and physiological implications. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:3-12.
27. Abramson S. Drug delivery in degenerative joint disease: where we are and where to go?. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006, 58:125-127.
28. Edwards S.H. Intra-articular drug delivery: the challenge to extend drug residence time within the joint. Vet J 2011, 190:15-21.
29. Gerwin N., Hops C., Lucke A. Intraarticular drug delivery in osteoarthritis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006, 58:226-242.
30. Dayton P.A., Allen J.S., Ferrara K.W. The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. JAcoust Soc Am 2002, 112:2183-2192.
31. Shortencarier M.J., Dayton P.A., Bloch S.H., Schumann P.A., Matsunaga T.O., Ferrara K.W. Amethod for radiation-force localized drug delivery using gas-filled lipospheres. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2004, 51:822-831.
32. Raeymaekers B., Pantea C., Sinha D.N. Manipulation of diamond nanoparticles using bulk acoustic waves. JAppl Phys 2011, 109:014317.
33. Mitragotri S. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on partition and diffusion coefficients in human stratum corneum. JControl Release 2001, 71:23-29.
34. Nieminen H.J., Herranen T., Kananen V., Hacking S.A., Salmi A., Karppinen P., et al. Ultrasonic transport of particles into articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Trans IEEE Int Ultrason Symp 2012, ID616:1869-1872.
35. Nance E., Timbie K., Miller G.W., Song J., Louttit C., Klibanov A.L., et al. Non-invasive delivery of stealth, brain-penetrating nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier using MRI-guided focused ultrasound. JControl Release 2014, 189:123-132.
36. Wood E.W., Loomis A.L. The physical and biological effects of high-frequency sound-waves of great intensity. Philos Mag 1927, 4:417-436.
37. Kim Y.S., Trillaud H., Rhim H., Lim H.K., Mali W., Voogt M., et al. MR thermometry analysis of sonication accuracy and safety margin of volumetric MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Radiology 2012, 265:627-637.
38. Liu H.L., Wai Y.Y., Chen W.S., Chen J.C., Hsu P.H., Wu X.Y., et al. Hemorrhage detection during focused-ultrasound induced blood-brain-barrier opening by using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008, 34:598-606.
39. Polat B.E., Hart D., Langer R., Blankschtein D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. JControl Release 2011, 152:330-348.
40. Menezes V., Takayama K., Gojani A., Hosseini S.H.R. Shock wave driven microparticles for pharmaceutical applications. Shock Waves 2008, 18:393-400.
41. Garcia-Gradilla V., Orozco J., Sattayasamitsathit S., Soto F., Kuralay F., Pourazary A., et al. Functionalized ultrasound-propelled magnetically guided nanomotors: toward practical biomedical applications. ACS Nano 2013, 7:9232-9240.
42. Lee I.W., Chang C.H., Cheng Y.C., Ko H.C., Chang F.M. Areview of three-dimensional ultrasound applications in fetal growth restriction. JMed Ultrasound 2012, 20:142-149.
43. Chang K.V., Lew H.L., Wang T.G., Chen W.S. Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in musculoskeletal medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 91:449-457.
44. Reddy N.K., Ioncica A.M., Saftoiu A., Vilmann P., Bhutani M.S. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography. World J Gastroenterol 2011, 17:42-48.
45. Das D., Gupta M., Kaur H., Kalucha A. Elastography: the next step. JOral Sci 2011, 53:137-141.
46. Wells P.N., Liang H.D. Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity. JR Soc Interface 2011, 8:1521-1549.
47. Miller D.L., Smith N.B., Bailey M.R., Czarnota G.J., Hynynen K., Makin I.R. Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations. JUltrasound Med 2012, 31:623-634.
48. Li C., Wu P., Zhang L., Fan W., Huang J., Zhang F. Osteosarcoma: limb salvaging treatment by ultrasonographically guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Cancer Biol Ther 2009, 8:1102-1108.
49. Field J.E. The physics of liquid impact, shock wave interactions with cavities, and the implications to shock wave lithotripsy. Phys Med Biol 1991, 36:1475-1484.
50. Catane R., Beck A., Inbar Y., Rabin T., Shabshin N., Hengst S., et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for the palliation of pain in patients with bone metastases-preliminary clinical experience. Ann Oncol 2007, 18:163-167.
51. Dromi S., Frenkel V., Luk A., Traughber B., Angstadt M., Bur M., et al. Pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound and low temperature-sensitive liposomes for enhanced targeted drug delivery and antitumor effect. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13:2722-2727.
52. Aro H., Kallioniemi H., Aho A.J., Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P. Ultrasonic device in bone cutting. A histological and scanning electron microscopical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1981, 52:5-10.
53. Cardoni A., MacBeath A., Lucas M. Methods for reducing cutting temperature in ultrasonic cutting of bone. Ultrasonics 2006, 44(Suppl 1):e37-42.
54. Hu X., Ohnmeiss D.D., Lieberman I.H. Use of an ultrasonic osteotome device in spine surgery: experience from the first 128 patients. Eur Spine J 2013, 22:2845-2849.
55. Rawson F. An Introduction to Ultrasonic Food Cutting 1998, Thomson Science, London.
56. Soria A.C., Villamiel M. Effect of ultrasound on the technological properties and bioactivity of food: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2010, 21:323-331.
57. Pei Z., Ferreira P., Kapoor S., Haselkorn M. Rotary ultrasonic machining for face milling of ceramics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 1995, 35:1033-1046.
58. Mordyuk B.N., Prokopenko G.I. Mechanical alloying of powder materials by ultrasonic milling. Ultrasonics 2004, 42:43-46.
59. Wiercigroch M., Wojewoda J., Krivtsov A. Dynamics of ultrasonic percussive drilling of hard rocks. JSound Vib 2005, 280:739-757.
60. Hessel V., Löwe H., Schönfeld F. Micromixers - a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chem Eng Sci 2005, 60:2479-2501.
61. Wilson M., Balmer L., Given M., MacGregor S., Mackersie J., Timoshkin I. Application of electric spark generated high power ultrasound to recover ferrous and non-ferrous metals from slag waste. Min Eng 2006, 19:491-499.
62. Matsuoka S.I. Ultrasonic welding of ceramics/metals using inserts. JMater Process Technol 1998, 75:259-265.
63. Friedman H., Reich S., Popovitz-Biro R., von Huth P., Halevy I., Koltypin Y., et al. Micro- and nano-spheres of low melting point metals and alloys, formed by ultrasonic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem 2013, 20:432-444.
64. Dular M., Delgosha O.C., Petkovšek M. Observations of cavitation erosion pit formation. Ultrason Sonochem 2013, 20:1113-1120.
65. Hocheng H., Kuo K. Fundamental study of ultrasonic polishing of mold steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2002, 42:7-13.
66. Rusinko A. Analytical description of ultrasonic hardening and softening. Ultrasonics 2011, 51:709-714.
67. Acker E.D., Fjield T., Harhen P.E., Lopath D.P. Thermal Treatment Methods and Apparatus with Focused Energy Application 2003, EP1299035A2.
68. Emery CD, Gelfand M, Levin HR, Zarins D. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Catheter Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Renal Neuromodulation. US Patent US20110112400 A1, 2011.
69. Yen Y.M., Cascio B., O'Brien L., Stalzer S., Millett P.J., Steadman J.R. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with microfracture and rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:200-205.
70. Freund J.B., Colonius T., Evan A.P. Acumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33:1495-1503.
71. Vakil N., Everbach E.C. Transient acoustic cavitation in gallstone fragmentation: a study of gallstones fragmented invivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993, 19:331-342.
72. Torr G. The acoustic radiation force. Am J Phys 1984, 52:402-408.
73. Hall L. The origin of ultrasonic absorption in water. Phys Rev 1948, 73:775.
74. Crum L., Bailey M., Hwang J.H., Khokhlova V., Sapozhnikov O. Therapeutic ultrasound: recent trends and future perspectives. Phys Procedia 2010, 3:25-34.
75. Styn N., Hall T.L., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A., Roberts W.W. Histotripsy homogenization of the prostate: thresholds for cavitation damage of periprostatic structures. JEndourol 2011, 25:1531-1535.
76. Al-Bataineh O., Jenne J., Huber P. Clinical and future applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2012, 38:346-353.
77. Amis A.A. Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:197-205.
78. Christensen R., Astrup A., Bliddal H. Weight loss: the treatment of choice for knee osteoarthritis? A randomized trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13:20-27.
79. Messier S.P., Gutekunst D.J., Davis C., DeVita P. Weight loss reduces knee-joint loads in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:2026-2032.
80. Knutsen G., Drogset J.O., Engebretsen L., Grontvedt T., Isaksen V., Ludvigsen T.C., et al. Arandomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. JBone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:2105-2112.
81. Bentley G., Bhamra J.S., Gikas P.D., Skinner J.A., Carrington R., Briggs T.W. Repair of osteochondral defects in joints-how to achieve success. Injury 2013, 44(Suppl 1):S3-S10.
82. Pritzker K.P., Gay S., Jimenez S.A., Ostergaard K., Pelletier J.P., Revell P.A., et al. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14:13-29.
83. Klaassen Z., Tubbs R.S., Apaydin N., Hage R., Jordan R., Loukas M. Vertebral spinal osteophytes. Anat Sci Int 2011, 86:1-9.
84. Sukul D.M.K.S.K., Johannes E.J., Pierik E.G.J.M., Vaneijck G.J.W.M., Kristelijn M.J.E. The effect of high-energy shock-waves focused on cortical bone - an invitro study. JSurg Res 1993, 54:46-51.
85. Vaezy S., Andrew M., Kaczkowski P., Crum L. Image-guided acoustic therapy. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2001, 3:375-390.
86. Jeong J.S., Chang J.H., Shung K.K. Pulse compression technique for simultaneous HIFU surgery and ultrasonic imaging: a preliminary study. Ultrasonics 2012, 52:730-739.
87. Ries M., de Senneville B.D., Roujol S., Berber Y., Quesson B., Moonen C. Real-time 3D target tracking in MRI guided focused ultrasound ablations in moving tissues. Magn Reson Med 2010, 64:1704-1712.
88. Kohler M.O., Mougenot C., Quesson B., Enholm J., Le Bail B., Laurent C., et al. Volumetric HIFU ablation under 3D guidance of rapid MRI thermometry. Med Phys 2009, 36:3521-3535.
89. Getgood A., Bhullar T.P.S., Rushton N. Current concepts in articular cartilage repair. Orthop Trauma 2009, 23:189-200.
90. Spahn G., Kahl E., Muckley T., Hofmann G.O., Klinger H.M. Arthroscopic knee chondroplasty using a bipolar radiofrequency-based device compared to mechanical shaver: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:565-573.
91. Allen R.T., Tasto J.P., Cummings J., Robertson C.M., Amiel D. Meniscal debridement with an arthroscopic radiofrequency wand versus an arthroscopic shaver: comparative effects on menisci and underlying articular cartilage. Arthroscopy 2006, 22:385-393.
92. King J.S., Green L.M., Bianski B.M., Pink M.A., Jobe C.M. Shaver, bipolar radiofrequency, and saline jet instruments for cutting meniscal tissue: a comparative experimental study on sheep menisci. Arthroscopy 2005, 21:844-850.
93. O'Daly B.J., Morris E., Gavin G.P., O'Keane C., O'Byrne J.M., McGuinness G.B. High power, low frequency ultrasound: meniscal tissue interaction and ablation characteristics. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37:556-567.
94. Packer M., Fishkind W.J., Fine I.H., Seibel B.S., Hoffman R.S. The physics of phaco: a review. JCataract Refract Surg 2005, 31:424-431.
95. Ashraf S., Walsh D.A. Angiogenesis in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2008, 20:573-580.
96. Ashraf S., Wibberley H., Mapp P.I., Hill R., Wilson D., Walsh D.A. Increased vascular penetration and nerve growth in the meniscus: a potential source of pain in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70:523-529.
97. Weeks E.M., Platt M.W., Gedroyc W. MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) to treat facet joint osteoarthritis low back pain-case series of an innovative new technique. Eur Radiol 2012, 22:2822-2835.
98. InSightec Safety and Efficacy of MRgFUS for the Treatment of Low Back Pain 2009-2013, 10 Oct 2013, NCT01232582, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Available:. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01232582.
99. Bonnet C.S., Walsh D.A. Osteoarthritis, angiogenesis and inflammation. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005, 44:7-16.
100. Mapp P.I., Walsh D.A. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2012, 8:390-398.
101. Walsh D.A., Pearson C.I. Angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of inflammatory joint and lung diseases. Arthritis Res 2001, 3:147-153.
102. Peacock D.J., Banquerigo M.L., Brahn E. Angiogenesis inhibition suppresses collagen arthritis. JExp Med 1992, 175:1135-1138.
103. Hwang J.H., Vaezy S., Martin R.W., Cho M.Y., Noble M.L., Crum L.A., et al. High-intensity focused US: a potential new treatment for GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:111-115.
104. Hynynen K., Colucci V., Chung A., Jolesz F. Noninvasive arterial occlusion using MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996, 22:1071-1077.
105. Kucewicz J.C., Bailey M.R., Kaczkowski P.J., Carter S.J. Focused ultrasound: concept for automated transcutaneous control of hemorrhage in austere settings. Aviat Space Environ Med 2009, 80:391-394.
106. Price R.J., Skyba D.M., Kaul S., Skalak T.C. Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation 1998, 98:1264-1267.
107. Ay T., Havaux X., Van Camp G., Campanelli B., Gisellu G., Pasquet A., et al. Destruction of contrast microbubbles by ultrasound: effects on myocardial function, coronary perfusion pressure, and microvascular integrity. Circulation 2001, 104:461-466.
108. Hosseinkhah N., Hynynen K. Athree-dimensional model of an ultrasound contrast agent gas bubble and its mechanical effects on microvessels. Phys Med Biol 2012, 57:785-808.
109. Otrock Z.K., Mahfouz R.A., Makarem J.A., Shamseddine A.I. Understanding the biology of angiogenesis: review of the most important molecular mechanisms. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2007, 39:212-220.
110. Iagnocco A. Imaging the joint in osteoarthritis: a place for ultrasound?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010, 24:27-38.
111. Betre H., Liu W., Zalutsky M.R., Chilkoti A., Kraus V.B., Setton L.A. Athermally responsive biopolymer for intra-articular drug delivery. JControl Release 2006, 115:175-182.
112. Staruch R., Chopra R., Hynynen K. Localised drug release using MRI-controlled focused ultrasound hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia 2011, 27:156-171.
113. Bekerdjian R., Grayburn P.A., Shohet R.V. Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. JAm Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:329-335.
114. Grull H., Langereis S. Hyperthermia-triggered drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes using MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound. JControl Release 2012, 161:317-327.
115. Postema M., van Wamel A., Lancee C.T., de Jong N. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004, 30:827-840.
116. Tezel A., Mitragotri S. Interactions of inertial cavitation bubbles with stratum corneum lipid bilayers during low-frequency sonophoresis. Biophys J 2003, 85:3502-3512.
117. Wang W., Castro L.A., Hoyos M., Mallouk T.E. Autonomous motion of metallic microrods propelled by ultrasound. ACS Nano 2012, 6:6122-6132.
118. Doinikov A.D. Acoustic radiation force on a spherical particle in a viscous heat-conducting fluid. II. Force on a rigid sphere. JAcoust Soc Am 1997, 101:722-730.
119. Cao L.Y., Zhang C.B., Huang H.F. Synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in ultrasonic precipitation. Ceram Int 2005, 31:1041-1044.
120. Nishida I. Precipitation of calcium carbonate by ultrasonic irradiation. Ultrason Sonochem 2004, 11:423-428.
121. Kopesky P.W., Vanderploeg E.J., Kisiday J.D., Frisbie D.D., Sandy J.D., Grodzinsky A.J. Controlled delivery of transforming growth factor β1 by self-assembling peptide hydrogels induces chondrogenesis of bone marrow stromal cells and modulates Smad2/3 signaling. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:83-92.
122. Palmer L.C., Stupp S.I. Molecular self-assembly into one-dimensional nanostructures. Acc Chem Res 2008, 41:1674-1684.
123. Jang K.W., Ding L., Seol D., Lim T.-H., Buckwalter J.A., Martin J.A. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound promotes chondrogenic progenitor cell migration via focal adhesion kinase pathway. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014, 40:1177-1186.
124. Lee H.J., Choi B.H., Min B.H., Son Y.S., Park S.R. Low-intensity ultrasound stimulation enhances chondrogenic differentiation in alginate culture of mesenchymal stem cells. Artif Organs 2006, 30:707-715.
125. Min B., Woo J., Cho H., Choi B., Park S., Choi M., et al. Effects of low-intensity ultrasound (LIUS) stimulation on human cartilage explants. Scand J Rheumatol 2006, 35:305-311.
126. Korstjens C., Van der Rijt R., Albers G., Semeins C., Klein-Nulend J. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound affects human articular chondrocytes invitro. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008, 46:1263-1270.
127. Dalecki D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004, 6:229-248.
128. Padilla F., Puts R., Vico L., Raum K. Stimulation of bone repair with ultrasound: a review of the possible mechanic effects. Ultrasonics 2014, 54:1125-1145.
129. Leskinen J.J., Hynynen K. Study of factors affecting the magnitude and nature of ultrasound exposure with invitro set-ups. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012, 38:777-794.
130. Byron C.R., Benson B.M., Stewart A.A., Stewart M.C. Effects of radial shock waves on membrane permeability and viability of chondrocytes and structure of articular cartilage in equine cartilage explants. Am J Vet Res 2005, 66:1757-1763.
131. Murata R., Nakagawa K., Ohtori S., Ochiai N., Arai M., Saisu T., et al. The effects of radial shock waves on gene transfer in rabbit chondrocytes invitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:1275-1282.
132. Kim H.J., Greenleaf J.F., Kinnick R.R., Bronk J.T., Bolander M.E. Ultrasound-mediated transfection of mammalian cells. Hum Gene Ther 1996, 7:1339-1346.
133. Nightingale K., Palmeri M., Trahey G. Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32:61-72.
134. Nilsson J., Evander M., Hammarstrom B., Laurell T. Review of cell and particle trapping in microfluidic systems. Anal Chim Acta 2009, 649:141-157.
135. Kapishnikov S., Kantsler V., Steinberg V. Continuous particle size separation and size sorting using ultrasound in a microchannel. JStat Mech Theor Exp 2006, P01012.
136. Frenkel V., Oberoi J., Stone M.J., Park M., Deng C., Wood B.J., et al. Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound enhances thrombolysis in an invitro model. Radiology 2006, 239:86-93.
137. Kuznetsova L.A., Coakley W.T. Applications of ultrasound streaming and radiation force in biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 2007, 22:1567-1577.
138. Nightingale K.R., Kornguth P.J., Trahey G.E. The use of acoustic streaming in breast lesion diagnosis: a clinical study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999, 25:75-87.
139. Clarke L., Edwards A., Pollard K. Acoustic streaming in ovarian cysts. JUltrasound Med 2005, 24:617-621.
140. Sponer J. Dependence of the cavitation threshold on the ultrasonic frequency. Czech J Phys 1990, 40:1123-1132.
141. Ogden J.A., Toth-Kischkat A., Schultheiss R. Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 8-17.
142. MacDonald E., Wood W.A. Fatigue mechanism in titanium at ultrasonic frequency. JAppl Phys 1971, 42:5531-5533.
143. Masselin I.A., Chasseray X., Durand-Bourlier L., Laine J.M., Syzaret P.Y., Lemordant D. Effect of sonication on polymeric membranes. JMembr Sci 2001, 181:213-220.
144. Muratore R., Akabas T., Muratore I.B. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of exvivo bovine achilles tendon. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008, 34:2043-2050.
145. Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008, 60:1193-1208.
146. Ishihara K. Method of Controlling Drug Release by Resonant Sound Wave. US Patent 5,190,766, 1993.
147. Lum A.F., Borden M.A., Dayton P.A., Kruse D.E., Simon S.I., Ferrara K.W. Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. JControl Release 2006, 111:128-134.
148. Rao R., Nanda S. Sonophoresis: recent advancements and future trends. JPharm Pharmacol 2009, 61:689-705.
149. Spengler J.F., Coakley W.T., Christensen K.T. Microstreaming effects on particle concentration in an ultrasonic standing wave. AIChE J 2003, 49:2773-2782.
150. Masuda K., Nakamoto R., Muramatsu Y., Miyamoto Y., Kim K., Chiba T. Active control of microcapsules in artificial blood vessel by producing local acoustic radiation force. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009, 2009:295-298.
151. Brujan E.A. The role of cavitation microjets in the therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004, 30:381-387.
152. Krefting D., Mettin R., Lauterborn W. High-speed observation of acoustic cavitation erosion in multibubble systems. Ultrason Sonochem 2004, 11:119-123.
153. White D., Evans J.A., Truscott J.G., Chivers R.A. Can ultrasound propagate in the joint space of a human knee?. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33:1104-1111.