Promises, promises for neuroscience and law

Current Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 18, 2014, Pages R861-R867

  Buckholtz, Joshua W ^a,b,c   Faigman, David L ^d,e,f  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Science and Health Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NEUROSCIENCE; TRENDS;

BRAIN; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; NEUROSCIENCES;

EID: 84908207501     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.057     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. P.A. Bandettini Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories NeuroImage 62 2012 575 588
2. H.T. Greely Reading minds with neuroscience-possibilities for the law Cortex 47 2011 1254 1255
3. J.W. Buckholtz, and R. Marois The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement Nat. Neurosci. 15 2012 655 661
4. O.D. Jones, R. Marois, M.J. Farah, and H.T. Greely Law and neuroscience J. Neurosci. 33 2013 17624 17630
5. T.R. Scott Neuroscience may supersede ethics and law Sci. Eng. Ethics 18 2012 433 437
6. A. Lamparello Neuroscience, Brain Damage, and the Criminal Defendant: Who Does It Help and Where in the Criminal Proceeding Is It Most Relevant? Rutgers Law Record 39 2012
7. F. Shen, M. Hoffman, O. Jones, J. Green, and R. Marois Sorting guilty minds New York University Law Rev. 81 2011
8. J. Edersheim, R. Brendel, and B. Price Neuroimaging, diminished capacity and mitigation J.R. Simpson, Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
9. T. Brown, and E. Murphy Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States Stanford Law Rev. 62 2010
10. J.T. Kubota, M.R. Banaji, and E.A. Phelps The neuroscience of race Nat. Neurosci. 15 2012 940 948
11. H.A. Korn, M.A. Johnson, and M.M. Chun Neurolaw: Differential brain activity for black and white faces predicts damage awards in hypothetical employment discrimination cases Social Neurosci. 7 2012 398 409
12. A.J. Kolber Experiential Future of the Law The Emory LJ 60 2010 585
13. M. Moore Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law 1997 Oxford University Press New York
14. L.G. Aspinwall, T.R. Brown, and J. Tabery The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths? Science 337 2012 846 849
15. L. Steinberg The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents' criminal culpability. Nature reviews Neuroscience 14 2013 513 518
16. Roper v. Simmons (2005). In 543 U.S. 551.
17. Graham v. Florida (2010). In 560 U.S. 48.
18. Miller v. Alabama (2012). In 132 S.Ct. 2455.
19. Simmons v. South Carolina (1994). In 512 U.S. 154.
20. J.L. Skeem, and J. Monahan Current directions in violence risk assessment Curr. Directions Psychol. Sci. 20 2011 38 42
21. A. Lamparello Using cognitive neuroscience to predict future dangerousness Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 42 2010 481
22. J.W. Buckholtz, and A. Meyer-Lindenberg MAOA and the Bioprediction of Antisocial Behavior: Science Fact and Science Fiction Bioprediction, Biomarkers, and Bad Behavior: Scientific, Legal, and Ethical Challenges 131 2013
23. J.W. Buckholtz, and A. Meyer-Lindenberg Psychopathology and the human connectome: toward a transdiagnostic model of risk for mental illness Neuron 74 2012 990 1004
24. P.S. Appelbaum The double helix takes the witness stand: behavioral and neuropsychiatric genetics in court Neuron 82 2014 946 949
25. D.L. Faigman, J. Monahan, and C. Slobogin Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony University Chicago Law Rev. 81 2014
26. M.T. Treadway, and J.W. Buckholtz On the use and misuse of genomic and neuroimaging science in forensic psychiatry: current roles and future directions Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 20 2011 533 546
27. M.J. Farah, J.B. Hutchinson, E.A. Phelps, and A.D. Wagner Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15 2014 123 131
28. E. Aharoni, G.M. Vincent, C.L. Harenski, V.D. Calhoun, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, M.S. Gazzaniga, and K.A. Kiehl Neuroprediction of future rearrest Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 2013 6223 6228
29. F. Schauer Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond Cornell Law Rev. 95 2010 1191 1220