Reading minds with neuroscience - Possibilities for the law

Cortex

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1254-1255

  Greely, Henry T ^a  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIME; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; LAW; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; PAIN;

EID: 80054056864     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.018     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Apkarian A.V., Sosa Y., Sonty S., Levy R.M., Harden R.N., Parris T.B., et al. Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(46):10410-10415.
2. Borsook D., Becerra L.R. Breaking down the barriers: fMRI applications in pain, analgesia and analgesics. Molecular Pain 2006, 2:30.
3. Christ S.E., Van Essen D.C., Watson J.M., Brubaker L.E., McDermott K.B. The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(7):1557-1566.
4. Farahany NA. Incriminating thoughts. Stanford Law Review, 64: forthcoming 2011.
5. Greely H.T., Illes J. Neuroscience-based lie detection: The urgent need for regulation. American Journal of Law and Medicine 2007, 33(2-3):377-431.
6. Greely H.T., Wagner A.D. Reference guide on neuroscience. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 2011, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. 3rd ed.
7. Greely HT. Mindreading, neuroscience, and the law. In Morse S and Roskies A (Eds), A Primer on Law and Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University. Press, in press.
8. Kolber A.J. Pain detection and the privacy of subjective experience. American Journal of Law and Medicine 2007, 33(2-3):433-456.
9. Monti M.M., Vanhaudenhuyse A., Coleman M.R., Boly M., Pickard J.D., Tshibanda L., et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine 2010, 362(7):579-589.
10. Murphy E.R., Greely H.T. What will be the limits of neuroscience-based mindreading in the law?. The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Illes, B. Sahakian (Eds.).
11. Phelps E.A., O'Connor K.J., Cunningham W.A., Funayama E.S., Gatenby J.C., Gore J.C., et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(5):729-738.
12. Phelps E.A., Thomas L.A. Race, behavior, and the brain: The role of neuroimaging in understanding complex social behaviors. Political Psychology 2003, 24(4):747-758.
13. Tracey I. Imaging pain. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008, 101(1):32-39.
14. United States v. Semrau. No. 07-10074 M1/P, Report and Recommendation (W.D. Tenn. May 31, 2010).
15. Wagner A.D. Can neuroscience identify lies?. A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience 2010, The Sage Center, Santa Barbara, CA. M.S. Gazzaniga, J.S. Rakoff (Eds.).
16. Wilson v Corestaff Services. L.P., 2010 NY Slip Op 20176, 1 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010); 900 N.Y.S.2d 639; 2010 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1044 (2010).