Erratum: Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by Duplex Sequencing (Nature Protocols (2014) 9 (2586-2606) DOI:10.1038/nprot.2014.170);Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by Duplex Sequencing

Nature Protocols

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2586-2606

  Kennedy, Scott R ^a   Schmitt, Michael W ^a   Fox, Edward J ^a   Kohrn, Brendan F ^b   Salk, Jesse J ^a   Ahn, Eun Hyun ^a   Prindle, Marc J ^a   Kuong, Kawai J ^a   Shen, Jiang Cheng ^a   Risques, Rosa Ana ^a   Loeb, Lawrence A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA POLYMERASE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA FRAGMENTATION; DUPLEX SEQUENCING; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENE DOSAGE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENOME SIZE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POINT MUTATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROCESS DESIGN; ULTRALOW FREQUENCY MUTATION; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; GENE LIBRARY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; PROCEDURES; WORKFLOW;

DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENE LIBRARY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MUTATION RATE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84908181086     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot1214-2903d     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Glenn, T.C. Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11, 759-769 (2011).
2. Loeb, L.A., Springgate, C.F. & Battula, N. Errors in DNA replication as a basis of malignant change. Cancer Res. 34, 2311-2321 (1974).
3. Gerlinger, M. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 883-892 (2012).
4. Navin, N. et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 472, 90-94 (2011).
5. Bolli, N. et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 5, 2997 (2014).
6. Lawrence, M.S. et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499, 214-218 (2013).
7. Kreso, A. et al. Variable clonal repopulation dynamics influence chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer. Science 339, 543-548 (2013).
8. Johnson, B.E. et al. Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science 343, 189-193 (2014).
9. Schmitt, M.W., Prindle, M.J. & Loeb, L.A. Implications of genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1267, 110-116 (2012).
10. Liu, Z. et al. Patterns of diversifying selection in the phytotoxin-like scr74 gene family of Phytophthora infestans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 659-672 (2005).
11. Srivatsan, A. et al. High-precision, whole-genome sequencing of laboratory strains facilitates genetic studies. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000139 (2008).
12. Holt, K.E. et al. High-throughput sequencing provides insights into genome variation and evolution in Salmonella typhi. Nat. Genet. 40, 987-993 (2008).
13. Loh, E., Salk, J.J. & Loeb, L.A. Optimization of DNA polymerase mutation rates during bacterial evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1154-1159, 2010).
14. Budowle, B. & van Daal, A. Extracting evidence from forensic DNA analyses: future molecular biology directions. Biotechniques 46, 339-340, 342-350 (2009).
15. Hofreiter, M., Jaenicke, V., Serre, D., von Haeseler, A. & Paabo, S. DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artifacts induced by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4793-4799 (2001).
16. Knapp, M. & Hofreiter, M. Next-generation sequencing of ancient DNA: requirements, strategies and perspectives. Genes 1, 227-243 (2010).
17. Carlson, C.A. et al. Decoding cell lineage from acquired mutations using, arbitrary deep sequencing. Nat. Methods 9, 78-80 (2012).
18. Besaratinia, A. et al. A high-throughput next-generation sequencing-based method for detecting the mutational fingerprint of carcinogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e116 (2012).
19. Schmitt, M.W. et al. Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14508-14513 (2012).
20. Kinde, I., Wu, J., Papadopoulos, N., Kinzler, K.W. & Vogelstein, B. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9530-9535 (2011).
21. Hiatt, J.B., Patwardhan, R.P., Turner, E.H., Lee, C. & Shendure, J. Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads. Nat. Methods 7, 119-122 (2010).
22. McCloskey, M.L., Stoger, R., Hansen, R.S. & Laird, C.D. Encoding PCR products with batch-stamps and barcodes. Biochem. Genet. 45, 761-767 2007).
23. Jabara, C.B., Jones, C.D., Roach, J., Anderson, J.A. & Swanstrom, R. Accurate sampling and deep sequencing of the HIV-1 protease gene using a primer ID. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20166-20171 (2011).
24. Kivioja, T. et al. Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 9, 72-74 (2012).
25. Casbon, J.A., Osborne, R.J., Brenner, S. & Lichtenstein, C.P. A method for counting PCR template molecules with application to next-generation sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e81 (2011).
26. Shiroguchi, K., Jia, T.Z., Sims, P.A. & Xie, X.S. Digital RNA sequencing minimizes sequence-dependent bias and amplification noise with optimized single-molecule barcodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1347-1352 (2012).
27. Zong, C., Lu, S., Chapman, A.R. & Xie, X.S. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell. Science 338, 1622-1626 (2012).
28. Wang, J., Fan, H.C., Behr, B. & Quake, S.R. Genome-wide single-cell analysis of recombination activity and de novo mutation rates in human sperm. Cell 150, 402-412 (2012).
29. Wang, Y. et al. Clonal evolution in breast cancer revealed by singlenucleus genome sequencing. Nature 512, 155-160 (2014).
30. Acevedo, A., Brodsky, L. & Andino, R. Mutational and fitness landscapes of an RNA virus revealed through population sequencing. Nature 505, 686-690 (2014).
31. Lou, D.I. et al. High-throughput DNA sequencing errors are reduced by orders of magnitude using circle sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19872-19877 (2013).
32. Diegoli, T.M., Farr, M., Cromartie, C., Coble, M.D. & Bille, T.W. An optimized protocol for forensic application of the PreCR repair mix to multiplex STR amplification of UV-damaged DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 6, 498-503 (2012).
33. Kennedy, S.R., Salk, J.J., Schmitt, M.W. & Loeb, L.A. Ultra-sensitive sequencing reveals an age-related increase in somatic mitochondrial mutations that are inconsistent with oxidative damage. PLoS Genet. 9 e1003794 2013).
34. Yost, S.E. et al. Identification of high-confidence somatic mutations in whole genome sequence of formalin-fixed breast cancer specimens. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e107 (2012).
35. Kerick, M. et al. Targeted high throughput sequencing in clinical cancer settings: formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, input amount and tumor heterogeneity. BMC Med. Genomics 4, 68 (2011).
36. Spencer, D.H. et al. Comparison of clinical targeted next-generation sequence data from formalin-fixed and fresh-frozen tissue specimens. J. Mol. Diagn. 15, 623-633 (2013).
37. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
38. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
39. McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303, 2010).
40. DePristo, M.A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491-498 (2011).