A new approach to evaluate forest structure restoration needs across Oregon and Washington, USA

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 335, Issue , 2015, Pages 37-50

  Haugo, Ryan ^a   Zanger, Chris ^a   DeMeo, Tom ^b   Ringo, Chris ^c   Shlisky, Ayn ^b   Blankenship, Kori ^a   Simpson, Mike ^b   Mellen McLean, Kim ^b   Kertis, Jane ^b   Stern, Mark ^a  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological restoration; Fire regime condition class; Gradient nearest neighbor; Landfire; Natural range of variation; Pacific Northwest

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; FIRE REGIMES; LANDFIRE; NATURAL RANGE OF VARIATION; NEAREST NEIGHBORS; PACIFIC NORTHWEST;

CONIFEROUS FOREST; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FOREST FIRE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SUCCESSION; THINNING; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; WATERSHED;

OREGON; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84907959219     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Agee J.K. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests 1993, Island Press, Washington, DC.
2. Agee J.K. Historical range of variability in eastern Cascades forests, Washington, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 2003, 18:725-740. 10.1023/B:LAND.0000014474.49803.f9.
3. Barrett, S., Havlina, D., Jones, J., Hann, W.J., Frame, C., Hamilton, D., Schon, K., DeMeo, T., Hutter, L., Menakis, J., 2010. Interagency Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) Guidebook, version 3.0. In: USDA Forest Service, US Department of the Interior, and The Nature Conservancy. http://www.frcc.gov/.
4. Brown R.T., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Forest restoration and fire: principles in the context of place. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:903-912. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.521_1.x.
5. Churchill D.J., Larson A.J., Dahlgreen M.C., Franklin J.F., Hessburg P.F., Lutz J.A. Restoring forest resilience: from reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 291:442-457. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.007.
6. Environmental Systems Resources Institute, 2013. ArcGIS Desktop 10.1. In: ESRI, Redlands, CA.
7. ESSA Technologies, L., 2007. Vegetation Dynamics Development Tool User Guide, Version 6.0. In: ESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, BC, p. 196.
8. Everett R.L., Schellhaas R., Keenum D., Spurbeck D., Ohlson P. Fire history in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests on the east slope of the Washington Cascades. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 129:207-225. 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00168-1.
9. Forbis T., Provencher L., Frid L., Medlyn G. Environ. Manage. 2006, 38(1):62-83. 10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2.
10. Franklin J.F., Dyrness C.T. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington 1973, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
11. Franklin J.F., Johnson K.N. A restoration framework for federal forests in the Pacific Northwest. J. For. 2012, 110:429-439.
12. Franklin, J.F., Hemstrom, M.A., Van Pelt, R., Buchanan, J.B., Hull, S., 2008. The case for active management of dry forest types in eastern Washington: perpetuating and creating old forest structures and functions. In: Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington, p. 105.
13. Franklin, J.F., Johnson, K.N., Churchill, D., Hagmann, K., Johnson, D., Johnson, J., 2013. Restoration of dry forests in eastern Oregon: a field guide. The Nature Conservancy, Portland, OR.
14. Gartner S., Reynolds K.M., Hessburg P.F., Hummel S., Twery M. Decision support for evaluating landscape departure and prioritizing forest management activities in a changing environment. For. Ecol. Manage. 2008, 256:1666-1676. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.053.
15. Hagmann R.K., Franklin J.F., Johnson N.K. Historical structure and composition of ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests in south-central Oregon. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 304:492-504. 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.005.
16. Halofsky J.E., Donato D.C., Hibbs D.E., Campbell J.L., Donaghy Cannon M., Fontaine J.B., Thompson J.R., Anthony R.G., Bormann B.T., Kayes L.J., Law B.E., Peterson D.L., Spies T.A. Mixed-severity fire regimes: lessons and hypotheses from the Klamath-Siskiyou Ecoregion. Ecosphere 2011, 2:art40. 10.1890/ES10-00184.1.
17. Halofsky, J.E., Creutzburg, M.K., Hemstrom, M.A., in press. Integrating social, economic, and ecological values across large landscapes. In: General Technical Report, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR.
18. Hann W.J., Bunnell D.L. Fire and land management planning and implementation across multiple scales. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2001, 10:389-403. 10.1071/WF01037.
19. Hardy C.C., Schmidt K.M., Menakis J.P., Sampson R.N. Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2001, 10:353-372.
20. Haugo R.D., Hall S.A., Gray E.M., Gonzales P., Bakker J.D. Influences of climate, fire, grazing, and logging on woody species composition along an elevation gradient in the eastern Cascades, Washington. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 260:2204-2213. 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.021.
21. Henderson, J.A., Lesher, R.D., Peter, D.H., Ringo, C.D., 2011. A landscape model for predicting potential natural vegetation of the Olympic Peninsula USA using boundary equations and newly developed environmental variables. In: General Technical Report PNW-GTR-841. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR.
22. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K. An environmental narrative of Inland Northwest United States forests, 1800-2000. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 178:23-59. 10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00052-5.
23. Hessburg, P., Smith, B.G., Kreiter, S.D., Miller, C.A., Salter, R.B., McNicoll, C.H., Hann, W.J., 1999. Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior Columbia River Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances. In: PNW-GTR-458. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
24. Hessburg, P.F., Smith, B.G., Kreiter, S.D., Millar, C.I., McNicoll, C.H., Wasienko-Holland, M., 2000a. Classifying plant series-level forest potential vegetation types: methods for subbasins sampled in the midscale assessment of the interior Columbia Basin. In: Research Paper PNW-RP-54. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR.
25. Hessburg P.F., Smith B.G., Salter R.B., Ottmar R.D., Alvarado E. Recent changes (1930s-1990s) in spatial patterns of interior northwest forests, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 136:53-83. 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00263-7.
26. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:117-139. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.016.
27. Hessburg P.F., Reynolds K.M., Keane R.E., James K.M., Salter R.B. Evaluating wildland fire danger and prioritizing vegetation and fuels treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 247:1-17. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.068.
28. Hessburg P.F., Reynolds K.M., Salter R.B., Dickinson J.D., Gaines W.L., Harrod R.J. Landscape evaluation for restoration planning on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, USA. Sustainability 2013, 5:805-840. 10.3390/su5030805.
29. Heyerdahl E.K., Loehman R.A., Falk D.A. Mixed-severity fire in lodgepole pine dominated forests: are historical regimes sustainable on Oregon's Pumice Plateau, USA?. Can. J. For. Res.-Rev. Can. Rech. For. 2014, 44:593-603. 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0413.
30. Hutto R.L. The ecological importance of severe wildfires: some like it hot. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:1827-1834. 10.1890/08-0895.1.
31. Wildlife-habitat relationships in Oregon and Washington 2001, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR. D.H. Johnson, T.A. O'Neil (Eds.).
32. Karau E.C., Keane R.E. Determining landscape extent for succession and disturbance simulation modeling. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:993-1006. 10.1007/s10980-007-9081-y.
33. Keane R.E., Parsons R.A., Hessburg P.F. Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach. Ecol. Model. 2002, 151:29-49. 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00470-7.
34. Keane R.E., Rollins M.G., Zhu Z.L. Using simulated historical time series to prioritize fuel treatments on landscapes across the United States: the LANDFIRE prototype project. Ecol. Model. 2007, 204:485-502. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.005.
35. Keane R.E., Hessburg P.F., Landres P.B., Swanson F.J. The use of historical range and variability (HRV) in landscape management. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:1025-1037. 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.035.
36. Keane, R.E., Holsinger, L.M., Parsons, R.A., 2011. Evaluating indices that measure departure of current landscape composition from historical conditions. In: RMRS-RP-83. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins CO.
37. Landres P.B., Morgan P., Swanson F.J. Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:179-1188. 10.2307/2641389.
38. Larson A.J., Churchill D. Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 267:74-92. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.038.
39. Low G., Provencher L., Abele S.L. Enhanced conservation action planning: assessing land-scape condition and predicting benefits of conservation strategies. J. Cosnser. Plan. 2010, 6:36-60.
40. Millar C.I., Stephenson N.L., Stephens S.L. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17:2145-2151. 10.1890/06-1715.1.
41. Moeur, M., Ohmann, J.L., Kennedy, R.E., Cohen, W.B., Gregory, M.J., Yang, Z., Roberts, H.M., Spies, T.A., Fiorella, M., 2011. Northwest Forest Plan, the first 15 years (1994-2008): Status and trends of late-successional and old-growth forests. In: General Technical Report PNW-GTR-853. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
42. Morgan P., Aplet G.H., Haufler J.B., Humphries H.C., Moore M.M., Wilson W.D. Historical range of variability: a useful tool for evaluating ecosystem change. J. Sustain. For. 1994, 2:87-111.
43. Morrison E.B., Lindell C.A. Active or passive forest restoration? Assessing restoration alternatives with avian foraging behavior. Restor. Ecol. 2011, 19:170-177. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00725.x.
44. North, M., Stine, P., O'Hara, K., Zielinski, W., Stephens, S.L., 2009. An ecosystem management strategy for sierran mixed-conifer forests. In: PSW-GTR-220. US Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
45. Noss R., Franklin J.F., Baker W.L., Schoennagel T., Moyle P. Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4:481-487. 10.1890/1540-9295(2006) 4[481:MFFITW]2.0.CO;2.
46. Ohmann J.L., Gregory M.J. Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest-neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, U.S.A. Can. J. For. Res.-Rev. Can. Rech. For. 2002, 32:725-741. 10.1139/X02-011.
47. Perry D.A., Hessburg P., Skinner C.N., Spies T.A., Stephens S.L., Taylor A.H., Franklin J., McComb B., Riegel G. The ecology of mixed severity fire regimes in Washington, Oregon, and Northern California. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:703-717. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.004.
48. Peterson, D.L., Johnson, M.C., Agee, J.K., Jain, T.B., McKenzie, D., Reinhard, E.D., 2005. Forest structure and fire hazard in dry forests of the western United States. In: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-628.
49. Pratt, S.D., Holsinger, L.M., Keane, R.E., 2006. Using simulation modeling to assess historical reference conditions for vegetation and fire regimes for the LANDFIRE prototype project. In: Rollins, M.G., Frame, C.K. (Eds.), The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: Nationally Consistent and Locally Relevant Geospatial Data for Wildland Fire Management. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-175. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Fort Collins CO.
50. Provencher L., Campbell J.L., Nachlinger J. Implementation of mid-scale fire regime condition class mapping. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17:390-406. 10.1071/WF07066.
51. Python Software Foundation, Python Language Reference, version 2.7.2. http://www.python.org.
52. Rasmussen, M., Lord, R., Vickery, B., McKetta, C., Green, D., Green, M., Hemstrom, M.A., Potiowsky, T., 2012. National forest health restoration an economic assessment of forest restoration on Oregon's eastside national forests. In: Prepared for Governor John Kitzhaber and Oregon's Legislative Leaders, p. 84.
53. Rollins M.G. LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2009, 18:235-249. 10.1071/WF08088.
54. Ryan K.C., Opperman T.S. LANDFIRE - a national vegetation/fuels data base for use in fuels treatment, restoration, and suppression planning. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.003.
55. Schoennagel T., Veblen T.T., Romme W.H. The interaction of fire, fuels and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. Bioscience 2004, 661:661-676. 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0661:TIOFFA]2.0.CO;2.
56. Schwilk D.W., Keeley J.E., Knapp E.E., McIver J., Bailey J.D., Fettig C., Fiedler C.E., Harrod R.J., Moghaddas J.J., Outcalt K.W., Skinner C.N., Stephens S.L., Waldrop T.H., Yaussy D.A., Youngblood A. The national fire and fire surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on vegetation structure and fuels. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:285-304. 10.1890/07-1747.1.
57. SER, 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration, version 2. In: Society for Ecological Restoration Science and Policy Working Group.
58. Shlisky, A.J., Guyette, R.P., Ryan, K.C., 2005. Modeling reference conditions to restore altered fire regimes in oak-hickory-pine forests: validating coarse models with local fire history data. In: EastFire Conference Proceedings. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, May 12-13, 2005.
59. Simley, J.D., Carswell Jr., W.J., 2009. The national map - hydrography. In: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009-3054. http://nhd.usgs.gov.
60. Simpson, M., 2007. Forested plant associations of the Oregon East Cascades. In: Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-03-207. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Portland, OR.
61. State of Oregon, 2011. Oregon business plan: Forest management and biomass, 2011 summary of progress. In: Oregon Solutions. http://orsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Forestry-2011-Accomplishments-and-2012-Initiatives.pdf.
62. Stephens S.L., Agee J.K., Fule P.Z., North M.P., Romme W.H., Swetnam T.W., Turner M.G. Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science 2013, 342:41-42. 10.1126/science.1240294.
63. Stine, P., Hessburg, P., Spies, T.A., Kramer, M., Fettig, C., Hansen, A., Lehmkuhl, J.F., O'Hara, K., Polivka, K., Singleton, P.H., Charnley, S., Merschel, A., in press. The ecology and management of moist mixed-conifer forests in eastern Oregon and Washington: a synthesis of relevant biophysical science and implications for future land management. In: General Technical Report, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
64. Swanson M.E., Franklin J.F., Beschta R.L., Crisafulli C.M., Dellasala D.A., Hutto R.L., Lindenmayer D.B., Swanson F.J. The forgotten state of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9:117-125. 10.1890/090157.
65. The Nature Conservancy, 2012. Press Release. In: The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/habitats/forests/newsroom/conservancy-applauds-forest-service.xml.
66. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., O'Neill R.V. Landscape Ecology, in theory and practice 2001, Springer, New York.
67. USDA Forest Service, 2004. Standards for mapping of vegetation in the Pacific Northwest Region. In: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR, p. 22.
68. USDA Forest Service, 2011a. Watershed Condition Framework: a framework for assessing and tracking changes in watershed condition. FS-977. In: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC.
69. USDA Forest Service, 2011b. Western Bark Beetle Strategy: human safety, recovery and resiliency. In: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington DC.
70. USDA Forest Service 36 CFR Part 219. National Forest system land management planning. Fed. Reg. 2012, 77:21162-21276.
71. USDA Forest Service, 2012b. Increasing the pace of restoration and job creation on our National Forests. In: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington DC.
72. USDA Forest Service, 2013. Restoration of fire-dependent forest: a sense of urgency. In: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5423599.pdf.
73. Van Pelt, R., 2008. Identifying Old Trees and Forests in Eastern Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
74. Weisz R., Tripeke J., Truman R. Evaluating the ecological sustainability of a ponderosa pine ecosystem on the Kaibab Plateau in Northern Arizona. Fire Ecol. 2009, 5:100-114.
75. Wimberly M.C., Spies T.A., Long C.J., Whitlock C. Simulating historical variability in the amount of old forest in the Oregon Coast Range. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14:167-180. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98284.x.
76. Wright C.S., Agee J.K. Fire and vegetation history in the eastern Cascade Mountains, Washington. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:443-459. 10.1890/02-5349.