Retraction Note to: Total knee arthroplasty performed with either a mini-subvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomized controlled study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years[Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, (2014), 134, 1155-1162, DOI 10.1007/s00402-014-1963-2];Total knee arthroplasty performed with either a mini-subvastus or a standard approach: A prospective randomized controlled study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 134, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1155-1162

  Lai, Zhen ^a   Shi, ShiYuan ^a   Fei, Jun ^a   Wei, Wei ^a  

^a Red Cross Hospital in Hangzhou   (China)

Author keywords

Mini subvastus approach; Minimal invasive surgery; Randomized controlled trial; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL ERROR; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84907656327     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2181-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (32)

1. Stern SH, Insall JN (1992) Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of 9-12 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 74:980-986
2. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S et al (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:94-102
3. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1995) The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a 10-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1713-1720
4. Buechel FF Sr (2002) Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:40-50
5. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC et al (2001) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplast 16:740-747
6. Walton NP, Jahromi I, Dobson PJ et al (2005) Arthrofibrosis following total knee replacement; does therapeutic warfarin make a difference? Knee 12:103-106
7. Tenholder M, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR (2005) Minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:67-76
8. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:68-73
9. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A et al (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:74-81
10. Karachalios T, Giotikas D, Roidis N et al (2008) Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomized clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90:584-591
11. Haas SB, Manitta MA, Burdick P (2006) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:112-116
12. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME et al (2008) Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 23:19-25
13. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME et al (2007) Evaluation of complications associated with six hundred mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:76-81
14. Kashyap SN, van Ommeren JW (2008) Clinical experience with less invasive surgery techniques in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:544-548
15. Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N et al (2005) Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:82-87
16. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L (2006) Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:106-111
17. Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM (2003) Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:185-190
18. Chen AF, Alan RK, Redziniak DE et al (2006) Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement: the initial experience with results at 2-4 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:1448-1453
19. Kim YH, Kim JS, Kim DY (2007) Clinical outcome and rate of complications after primary total knee replacement performed with quadriceps-sparing or standard arthrotomy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:467-470
20. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C (2004) Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:61-67
21. Kim JG, Lee SW, Ha JK et al (2011) The effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty to preserve quadriceps strength: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 18:443-447
22. Liebensteiner MC, Krismer M, Koller A et al (2012) Does minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty improve isokinetic torque? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3233-3239
23. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD et al (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13-14
24. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J et al (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:893-900
25. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9-12
26. Benjamin J, Chilvers M (2006) Correcting lateral patellar tilt at the time of total knee arthroplasty can result in overuse of lateral release. J Arthroplast 21:121-126
27. Pagnano MW, Meneghini RM, Trousdale RT (2006) Anatomy of the extensor mechanism in reference to quadriceps-sparing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:102-105
28. Holt G, Nunn T, Allen RA et al (2008) Variation of the vastus medialis obliquus insertion and its relevance to minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 23:600-604
29. Hoffman AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE (1991) Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:70-77
30. Bindeglass DF, Vince KG (1996) Patellar tilt and subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 11:507-511
31. Dalury DF, Dennis DA (2005) Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:77-81
32. King J, Stamper DL, Schaad DC et al (2007) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1497-1503