Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: An outcome study

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 428, Issue , 2004, Pages 74-81

  Laskin, Richard S ^a   Beksac, Burak ^b   Phongjunakorn, Anuwat ^c   Pittors, Kathleen ^d   Davis, John ^a   Shim, Jae Chan ^e   Pavlov, Helene ^a   Petersen, Margaret ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b SSK Goztege Education Hospital   (Turkey)

^c Lampeng Hospital   (Thailand)

^d ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^e Seoul Paik College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; CEPHALOSPORIN; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADHESION; ADULT; AGED; CONFERENCE PAPER; DRUG USE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATELLA; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; RECTUS FEMORIS MUSCLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN INCISION; STANDARD; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VASTUS MEDIALIS MUSCLE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 8644229300     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148582.86102.47     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Dalury DF, Jiranek WA: A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:33-37, 1999.
2. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL: A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:322-331, 1997.
3. Engh GA, Parks NL: Surgical technique of midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop 351:270-274, 1998.
4. Ewald FC: The Knee Society total Knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9-12, 1989.
5. Healy WL, Iorio R, Ko J, Appleby D, Lemos DW: Impact of cost reduction programs on short-term patient outcome and hospital cost of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:348-353, 2002.
6. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE: Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269:70-77, 1991.
7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott R: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14, 1987.
8. Kanamiya T, Whiteside LA, Nakamura T, et al: Ranawat Award paper. Effect of selective lateral release on stability in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 404:24-31, 2002.
9. Keblish PA: The lateral approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 16:62-68, 2003.
10. Knoben JE, Anderson PO: Handbook of Clinical Drug Data. Ed 7. Drug Intelligence Publishing Co, Hamilton, IL 598-600, 1993.
11. Lachiewicz PF: The role of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 380:144-150, 2000.
12. Laskin RS, Maruyama Y, Villaneuva M, Bourne R: Deep-dish congruent tibial component use in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized prospective study. Clin Orthop 380:36-44, 2000.
13. Parentis MA, Rumi MN, Deol GS, et al: A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367:107-116, 1999.
14. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al: Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:970-976, 2001.
15. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary: Merriam-Webster INC, Springfield, MA, 756, 2002.