Evaluation of complications associated with six hundred mini-sub vastus total knee arthroplasties

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2007, Pages 76-81

  Schroer, William C ^a   Diesfeld, Paul J ^b   Reedy, Mary E ^b   LeMarr, Angela R ^b  

^a St Louis Joint Replacement Institute   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; LEG MOVEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENDON RUPTURE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALGUS DEFORMITY; VARUS DEFORMITY; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 35048881407     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200710001-00008     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Laskin RS. New techniques and concepts in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:151-3.
2. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:61-7.
3. Scuderi GR, Tria AJ Jr. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ Jr, editors. MIS of the Hip and the Knee; a Clinical Perspective. New York: Springer; 2004. p 175-86.
4. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Kester MA. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:217-26.
5. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:68-73.
6. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, Pittors K, Davis J, Shim JC, Pavlov H, Peterson M. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:74-81.
7. Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics. 2003;26:899-903.
8. Bonutti PM. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty - midvastus approach. In: Hozack WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, Bonutti PM, Rachbauer F, Schaffer JL, Donnelly WJ, editors. Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty. New York: Springer; 2004. p 139-45.
9. Goble EM, Justin DF. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: principles and technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:235-45.
10. Tria AJ. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:227-34.
11. Tria AJ. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003;26:859-63.
12. Choi YJ, Tanavalee A, Chan APH, Coon TM, Tria AJ Jr. Minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ Jr, editors. MIS of the hip and the knee; a clinical perspective. New York: Springer; 2004. p 187-98.
13. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, LeMarr A, Reedy ME. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007. In Press.
14. American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Advisory statement. Minimally invasive and small incision joint replacement surgery: what surgeons should consider. July 2004. http://www.aahks.org/pdf/MIS_phys_adv_stmt.pdf.
15. Schroer WC. Mini-subvastus approach with an intramedullary tibial guide. In: Stuchin SA, editor. Surgical techniques in orthopaedics: minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (DVD Video). Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2005.
16. Schroer WC, Diesfeld P LeMarr A, Reedy ME, Ballard WT, Moskal JT. Association of increased knee flexion and patella clunk syndrome after minimally invasive TKA. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2006 Mar 23-27; Chicago, IL. Paper no. 142.
17. Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L. Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther. 1978;58:1355-90.
18. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432-8.
19. Archibeck MJ, White RE. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:232-8.
20. Keating EM, Meding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA. Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:34-9.
21. Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:28-34.
22. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79-86.
23. Soohoo NF, Zingmond DS, Lieberman JR, Ko Cy. Primary total knee arthroplasty in California 1991 to 2001, does hospital volume affect outcomes? J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:199-205.
24. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26-34.
25. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:67-72.
26. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr A. Surgical accuracy with the mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty: a CT scan analysis of post-operative implant alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2007. In press.
27. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7-13.