New methods for using computer-aided detection information for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 87, Issue 1036, 2014, Pages

  Schalekamp, S ^a   Van Ginneken, B ^a   Heggelman, B G F ^b   Imhof Tas, M ^a   Somers, I ^b   Brink, M ^a   Spee, M ^a   Schaefer Prokop, C M ^a,b   Karssemeijer, N ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MEANDER MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG NODULE; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; ROC CURVE; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE;

EID: 84907546694     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: 1748880X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140015     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Austin JH, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992; 182: 115-22. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.182.1.1727272
2. Quekel LG, Kessels AG, Goei R, van Engelshoven JM. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest 1999; 115: 720-4.
3. Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Uhlenhopp MA. Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. Radiology 1983; 148: 609-15. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.148.3.6308709
4. Heelan RT, Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR, Zaman MB, Perchick WB, Caravelli JF, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the New York screening program. Radiology 1984; 151: 289-93. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.151.2.6324279
5. Monnier-Cholley L, Arrivé L, Porcel A, Shehata K, Dahan H, Urban T, et al. Characteristics of missed lung cancer on chest radiographs: a French experience. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 597-605.
6. Wu M, Gotway MB, Lee TJ, Chern M, Cheng H, Ko JS, et al. Features of non-small cell lung carcinomas overlooked at digital chest radiography. Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 518-28. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.09.011
7. de Hoop B, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Gietema HA, de Jong PA, van Ginneken B, van Klaveren RJ, et al. Screening for lung cancer with digital chest radiography: sensitivity and number of secondary work-up CT examinations. Radiology 2010; 255: 629-37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091308
8. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decisionmaking in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1978; 13: 175-81.
9. Manning DJ, Ethell SC, Donovan T. Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 231-5.
10. Kligerman S, Cai L, White CS. The effect of computer-aided detection on radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancers previously missed on a chest radiograph. J Thorac Imaging 2013; 28: 244-52. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31826c29ec
11. Xu Y, Ma D, He W. Assessing the use of digital radiography and a real-time interactive pulmonary nodule analysis system for large population lung cancer screening. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: e451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.031
12. van Beek EJR, Mullan B, Thompson B. Evaluation of a real-time interactive pulmonary nodule analysis system on chest digital radiographic images: a prospective study. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 571-5. doi: 10.1016/j. acra.2008.01.018
13. Meziane M, Obuchowski NA, Lababede O, Lieber ML, Philips M, Mazzone P. A comparison of follow-up recommendations by chest radiologists, general radiologists, and pulmonologists using computer-aided detection to assess radiographs for actionable pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W542-9.
14. de Boo DW, Uffmann M, Weber M, Bipat S, Boorsma EF, Scheerder MJ, et al. Computeraided detection of small pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: an observer study. Acad Radiol 2011; 18: 1507-14. doi: 10.1016/j. acra.2011.08.008
15. de Hoop B, de Boo DW, Gietema HA, van Hoorn F, Mearadji B, Schijf L, et al. Computer-aided detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: effect on observer performance. Radiology 2010; 257: 532-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092437
16. Lee KH, Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ, Jin KN. Computer-aided detection of malignant lung nodules on chest radiographs: effect on observers' performance. Korean J Radiol 2012; 13: 564-71. doi: 10.3348/ kjr.2012.13.5.564
17. Samulski MRM, Snoeren PR, Platel B, van Ginneken B, Hogeweg L, Schaefer-Prokop C, et al. Computer-aided detection as a decision assistant in chest radiography. In: Manning DJ, Abbey CK, editors. Medical imaging 2011: image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment. Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 7966. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics; 2011.
18. Hupse R, Samulski M, Lobbes MB, Mann RM, Mus R, den Heeten GJ, et al. Computeraided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts. Radiology 2013; 266: 123-9. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.12120218
19. Samulski M, Hupse R, Boetes C, Mus R, den Heeten G, Karssemeijer N. Using computer aided detection in mammography as a decision support. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2323-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1821-8
20. Karssemeijer N, Otten JDM, Verbeek ALM, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ, Hendriks JHCL, et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003; 227: 192-200. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2271011962
21. Li F, Engelmann R, Pesce LL, Doi K, Metz CE, Macmahon H. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging - comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiology 2011; 261: 937-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110192
22. Li F, Engelmann R, Pesce L, Armato SG 3rd, Macmahon H. Improved detection of focal pneumonia by chest radiography with bone suppression imaging. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2729-35. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2550-y
23. Freedman MT, Lo SCB, Seibel JC, Bromley CM. Lung nodules: improved detection with software that suppresses the rib and clavicle on chest radiographs. Radiology 2011; 260: 265-73. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.11100153
24. Schalekamp S, van Ginneken B, Meiss L, Peters-Bax L, Quekel LGBA, Snoeren MM, et al. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 2399-405. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2013.09.016
25. Schalekamp S, van Ginneken B, Koedam E, Snoeren MM, Tiehuis AM, Wittenberg R, et al. Computer aided detection improves detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs beyond the support by bone suppressed images. Radiology 2014; in press.
26. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27: 723-31.
27. Roe CA, Metz CE. Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates. Acad Radiol 1997; 4: 587-600.