Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: Interactive decision support versus prompts

Radiology

Volumn 266, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 123-129

  Hupse, Rianne ^a   Samulski, Maurice ^a   Lobbes, Marc B ^b   Mann, Ritse M ^a   Mus, Roel ^a   Den Heeten, Gerard J ^c,d   Beijerinck, David ^e   Pijnappel, Ruud M ^d,f   Boetes, Carla ^b   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening   (Netherlands)

^e Centre/Mid West Part of the Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESIDENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84871681489     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120218     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16):1675-1684.
2. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection - prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006;239(2):375-383.
3. Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):20-28. (Pubitemid 46100140)
4. Nishikawa RM. Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31(4-5):224-235. (Pubitemid 46601782)
5. Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, et al. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103(15):1152-1161.
6. Taylor P, Potts HW. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 2008;44(6):798-807.
7. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356(14):1399-1409. (Pubitemid 46556325)
8. Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, et al. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 2004;233(2):418-423. (Pubitemid 39423800)
9. Houssami N, Given-Wilson R, Ciatto S. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009;53(2):171-176.
10. Alberdi E, Povyakalo AA, Strigini L, Ayton P, Given-Wilson R. CAD in mammography: lesion-level versus case-level analysis of the effects of prompts on human decisions. Int J CARS 2008;3(1-2):115-122.
11. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen 1999;6(3):152-158. (Pubitemid 29526264)
12. Mello-Thoms C. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation. Acad Radiol 2003;10(1):4-12. (Pubitemid 36015352)
13. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227(1):192-200. (Pubitemid 36384199)
14. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Rijken H, Holland R. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support. Br J Radiol 2006;79(Spec No 2):S123-S126. (Pubitemid 46151856)
15. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Lan L, Mendelson EB, Hendrick RE. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 2006;240(2):357-368. (Pubitemid 44098631)
16. Tourassi GD, Harrawood B, Singh S, Lo JY, Floyd CE. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 2007;34(1):140-150. (Pubitemid 46035236)
17. Zheng B, Mello-Thoms C, Wang XH, et al. Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library. Acad Radiol 2007;14(8):917-927. (Pubitemid 47058995)
18. Samulski M, Hupse R, Boetes C, Mus RD, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support. Eur Radiol 2010;20(10):2323-2330.
19. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009;253(2):353-358.
20. Samulski MR, Snoeren PR, Platel B, et al. Computer-aided detection as a decision assistant in chest radiography. In: Editor A, Editor B, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2011 - title. Vol 7966. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2011; 796614.
21. Hupse R, Karssemeijer N. The use of contextual information for computer aided detection of masses in mammograms. In: Editor A, Editor B, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2009 - title. Vol 7260. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2009; 72600Q.
22. Kallenberg M, Karssemeijer N. Computer-aided detection of masses in full-field digital mammography using screen-film mammograms for training. Phys Med Biol 2008;53(23):6879-6891.
23. Zheng B, Tan J, Ganott MA, Chough DM, Gur D. Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods. Acad Radiol 2009;16(11):1338-1347.
24. van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. Med Phys 2007;34(3):898-905. (Pubitemid 46355653)
25. Chang YH, Good WF, Sumkin JH, Zheng B, Gur D. Computerized localization of breast lesions from two views. An experimental comparison of two methods. Invest Radiol 1999;34(9):585-588. (Pubitemid 29418985)
26. Roelofs A, van Woudenberg S, Hendriks J, Evertsz C, Karssemeijer N. Effects of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection of breast masses. IWDM: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2004; 219-224.
27. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27(9):723-731.
28. Beiden SV, Wagner RF, Doi K, et al. Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. Acad Radiol 2002;9(9):1036-1043. (Pubitemid 34984678)