Computer-aided detection improves detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs beyond the support by bone-suppressed images

Radiology

Volumn 272, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 252-261

  Schalekamp, Steven ^a   Van Ginneken, Bram ^a   Koedam, Emmeline ^a   Snoeren, Miranda M ^a   Tiehuis, Audrey M ^b   Wittenberg, Rianne ^b   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a   Schaefer Prokop, Cornelia M ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MEANDER MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BONE SUPPRESSED IMAGE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JACKKNIFE TEST; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84903730137     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131315     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Austin JH, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992;182(1):115-122.
2. Quekel LG, Kessels AG, Goei R, van Engelshoven JM. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest 1999;115(3):720-724. (Pubitemid 29129951)
3. Monnier-Cholley L, Arrivé L, Porcel A, et al. Characteristics of missed lung cancer on chest radiographs: a French experience. Eur Radiol 2001;11(4):597-605. (Pubitemid 32755498)
4. Shah PK, Austin JHM, White CS, et al. Missed non-small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. Radiology 2003;226(1):235-241. (Pubitemid 36163935)
5. Freedman MT, Lo SCB, Seibel JC, Bromley CM. Lung nodules: improved detection with software that suppresses the rib and clavicle on chest radiographs. Radiology 2011;260(1):265-273.
6. Li F, Engelmann R, Pesce LL, Doi K, Metz CE, Macmahon H. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging - comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Radiology 2011;261(3):937-949.
7. Xu Y, Ma D, He W. Assessing the use of digital radiography and a real-time interactive pulmonary nodule analysis system for large population lung cancer screening. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(4):e451-e456.
8. De Boo DW, Uffmann M, Weber M, et al. Computer-aided detection of small pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: an observer study. Acad Radiol 2011;18(12):1507-1514.
9. de Hoop B, De Boo DW, Gietema HA, et al. Computer-aided detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: effect on observer performance. Radiology 2010;257(2):532-540.
10. Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al. Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(4):417-434.
11. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27(9):723-731.
12. Roe CA, Metz CE. Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates. Acad Radiol 1997;4(8):587-600. (Pubitemid 127470980)
13. Austin JH, Müller NL, Friedman PJ, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 1996;200(2):327-331. (Pubitemid 26249879)
14. Li F, Hara T, Shiraishi J, Engelmann R, MacMahon H, Doi K. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(5):W535-W541.
15. van Beek EJR, Mullan B, Thompson B. Evaluation of a real-time interactive pulmonary nodule analysis system on chest digital radiographic images: a prospective study. Acad Radiol 2008;15(5):571-575. (Pubitemid 351509767)
16. Kligerman S, Cai L, White CS. The effect of computer-aided detection on radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancers previously missed on a chest radiograph. J Thorac Imaging 2013;28(4):244-252.
17. Bley TA, Baumann T, Saueressig U, et al. Comparison of radiologist and CAD performance in the detection of CT-confirmed subtle pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 2008;43(6):343-348. (Pubitemid 351769891)
18. Meziane M, Obuchowski NA, Lababede O, Lieber ML, Philips M, Mazzone P. A comparison of follow-up recommendations by chest radiologists, general radiologists, and pulmonologists using computer-aided detection to assess radiographs for actionable pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(5):W542-W549.
19. Szucs-Farkas Z, Schick A, Cullmann JL, et al. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(5):1006-1013.
20. Lee KH, Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ, Jin KN. Computer-aided detection of malignant lung nodules on chest radiographs: effect on observers' performance. Korean J Radiol 2012;13(5):564-571.