Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: From research into clinical practice

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 87, Issue 1036, 2014, Pages

  Addison, S ^a   Arthurs, O J ^b   Thayyil, S ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOPSY; CHILD; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; HUMAN; INFANT; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW; STANDARD; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

AUTOPSY; CHILD; FETAL DEATH; FETUS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN SIZE; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 84907545946     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: 1748880X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130621     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Stambouly JJ, Kahn E, Boxer RA. Correlation between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in critically ill children. Pediatrics 1993; 92: 248-51.
2. Cardoso MP, Bourguignon DC, Gomes MM, Saldiva PH, Pereira CR, Troster EJ. Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pediatr Crit CareMed 2006; 7: 423-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000235257.86519.16
3. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsydetected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849
4. Vogt C, Blaas HG, Salvesen KA, Eik-Nes SH. Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 666-72. doi: 10.1002/ uog.10106
5. Akgun H, Basbug M, Ozgun MT, Canoz O, Tokat F, Murat N, et al. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in fetal anomalies terminated in the second trimester. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 457-62.
6. Amini H, Antonsson PE, Papadogiannakis N, Ericson K, Pilo C, Eriksson L, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 1208-16. doi: 10.1080/00016340600880886
7. Gordijn SJ, Erwich JJ, Khong TY. Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5: 480-8. doi: 10.1007/s10024-002-0008-y
8. Gordijn SJ, Erwich JJ, Khong TY. The perinatal autopsy: pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 3-7. doi: 10.1016/j. ejogrb.2006.10.031
9. Sankar VH, Phadke SR. Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 224-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211482
10. Wittschieber D, Klauschen F, Kimmritz AC, von Winterfeld M, Kamphues C, Scholman HJ, et al. Who is at risk for diagnostic discrepancies? Comparison of pre- and postmortal diagnoses in 1800 patients of 3 medical decades in East and West Berlin. PLoS One 2012; 7: 22. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0037460
11. Cockerill R, Whitworth MK, Heazell AE. Do medical certificates of stillbirth provide accurate and useful information regarding the cause of death? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26: 117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 3016.2011.01247.x
12. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Perinatal mortality 2007: United Kingdom. London, UK: CEMACH; 2009.
13. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, van Rijn RR. Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 141-52. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1486-0
14. Shojania KG, Burton EC. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 873-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0707996
15. McHaffie HE, Fowlie PW, Hume R, Laing IA, Lloyd DJ, Lyon AJ. Consent to autopsy for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 85: F4-7.
16. Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996; 348: 1139-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96) 02287-8
17. Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA, Whitehead AL, Cross JJ, Lomas DJ, et al. Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 317-23.
18. Cannie M, Votino C, Moerman P, Vanheste R, Segers V, Van Berkel K, et al. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 659-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.10079
19. Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH. Postmortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 2005; 365: 1271-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74816-9
20. Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S, Mushtaq I, Taylor A, Chitty LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination ("keyhole autopsy"): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 513-18.
21. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, et al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 41-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.1.8976917
22. Alderliesten M, Peringa J, van der Hulst V, Blaauwgeers H, van Lith J. Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 2003; 110: 378-82.
23. Breeze AC, Cross JJ, Hackett GA, Jessop FA, Joubert I, Lomas DJ, et al. Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 918-24. doi: 10.1002/uog.3886
24. Hagmann C, Robertson N, Sams V, Brookes J. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renaltract abnormalities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F215-18.
25. Widjaja E, Whitby E, Cohen M, Paley M, Griffiths P. Post-mortem MRI of the foetal spine and spinal cord. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 679-85.
26. Huisman T, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Krestin G, Huch R, Kubik-Huch R. MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002; 17: 58-64.
27. Cohen M, Paley M, Griffiths P, Whitby E. Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2008; 11: 1-9.
28. Thayyil S, Schievano S, Robertson NJ, Jones R, Chitty LS, Sebire NJ, et al. A semiautomated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.013
29. Votino C, Verhoye M, Segers V, Cannie M, Bessieres B, Cos T, et al. Fetal organ weight estimation by postmortem high-field magnetic resonance imaging before 20 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 673-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.11151
30. Sandaite I, De Catte L, Moerman P, Gewillig M, Fedele L, Deprest J, et al. A morphometric study of the human fetal heart on postmortem 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 318-27.
31. Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Chong W, Olsen O, et al. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 2013; 382: 223-33. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(13)60134-8
32. Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M, Griffiths PD. Post-mortem fetal MRI: what do we learn from it? Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.11.024
33. Prodhomme O, Seguret F, Martrille L, Pidoux O, Cambonie G, Couture A, et al. Organ volume measurements: comparison between MRI and autopsy findings in infants following sudden unexpected death. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F434-8.
34. Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS, Wade A, Skordis-Worrall J, Bennett-Britton I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: e142-8. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2009.10.007
35. Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W, Vock P, Boesch C, Ozdoba C, et al. Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 2003; 48: 386-403.
36. Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Olsen O, Gunny RS, et al. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS protocol). BMC Pediatr 2011; 11: 120. doi: 10.1186/ 1471-2431-11-120
37. Tofts PS, Jackson JS, Tozer DJ, Cercignani M, Keir G, MacManus DG, et al. Imaging cadavers: cold FLAIR and noninvasive brain thermometry using CSF diffusion. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 190-5. doi: 10.1002/ mrm.21456
38. Thayyil S, De Vita E, Sebire NJ, Bainbridge A, Thomas D, Gunny R, et al. Post-mortem cerebral magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 in fetuses, newborns and infants. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 232-8. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2011.01.105
39. Hillewig E, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Christe A, Plattner T, Thali MJ. Gas embolism following intraosseous medication application proven by post-mortem multislice computed tomography and autopsy. Resuscitation 2007; 72: 149-53.
40. Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Whitehead AL, Set PA, Berman L, Hackett GA, et al. Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy. Virchows Arch 2008; 452: 201-7. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0548-7
41. Garg S, Punia RP, Basu S, Mohan H, Bal A. Comparison of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2009; 28: 139-50. doi: 10.1080/ 15513810902772482
42. Fariña J, Millana C, Fdez-Aceñero MJ, Furi ó V, Aragoncillo P, Martín VG, et al. Ultrasonographic autopsy (echopsy): a new autopsy technique. Virchows Arch 2002; 440: 635-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428- 002-0607-z
43. Fan JK, Tong DK, Poon JT, Lo OS, Beh PS, Patil NG, et al. Multimodality minimally invasive autopsy - a feasible and accurate approach to post-mortem examination. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 195: 93-8. doi: 10.1016/ j.forsciint.2009.11.019
44. Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, et al. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 2012; 379: 136-42. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(11)61483-9
45. Ruder TD, Hatch GM, Ebert LC, Flach PM, Ross S, Ampanozi G, et al. Whole body postmortem magnetic resonance angiography. J Forensic Sci 2012; 57: 778-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02037.x
46. O'Donoghue K, O'Regan KN, Sheridan CP, O'Connor OJ, Benson J, McWilliams S, et al. Investigation of the role of computed tomography as an adjunct to autopsy in the evaluation of stillbirth. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 1667-75. doi: 10.1016/j. ejrad.2011.03.093
47. Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS, Thayyil S, Judge-Kronis L, Taylor AM, et al. Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals' views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 307-12.
48. NHS Implementation Subgroup of the Department of Health Post Mortem Fosensic and Disaster Imaging Group. Can crosssectional imaging as an adjunct and/or alternative to the invasive autopsy be implemented within the NHS? Report from the NHS Implementation Sub-group of the Department of Health Post Mortem Forensic and Disaster Imaging Group. 2012. Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/10/lessinvasive- autopsy/