Erratum: Department of Error (Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study (2013) 382(9888) (223–233), (S0140673613601348), (10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60134-8));Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: A prospective validation study

The Lancet

Volumn 382, Issue 9888, 2013, Pages 223-233

  Thayyil, Sudhin ^a   Sebire, Neil J ^b,c   Chitty, Lyn S ^b   Wade, Angie ^b   Chong, Wk ^c   Olsen, Oystein ^c   Gunny, Roxana S ^c   Offiah, Amaka C ^d   Owens, Catherine M ^c   Saunders, Dawn E ^c   Scott, Rosemary J ^e   Jones, Rod ^a   Norman, Wendy ^a   Addison, Shea ^a   Bainbridge, Alan ^e   Cady, Ernest B ^f   Vita, Enrico De ^a   Robertson, Nicola J ^a   Taylor, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d SHEFFIELD CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; AUTOPSY; CAUSE OF DEATH; CHILD; CHILD DEATH; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; GESTATIONAL AGE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INFANT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGIST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION STUDY; WHOLE BODY MRI;

EID: 84880514917     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62657-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. JL Burton, J Underwood Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy Lancet 369 2007 1471 1480
2. KG Shojania, EC Burton, KM McDonald, L Goldman Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review JAMA 289 2003 2849 2856
3. KG Shojania, EC Burton The vanishing nonforensic autopsy N Engl J Med 358 2008 873 875
4. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) Perinatal mortality 2007 2009 CEMACH London, UK
5. JA Brookes, MA Hall-Craggs, VR Sams, WRC Lees Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging Lancet 348 1996 1139 1141
6. MC Cohen, MN Paley, PD Griffiths, EHC Whitby Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem Pediatr Dev Pathol 11 2008 1 9
7. E Whitby, S Variend, S Rutter et al. Corroboration of in utero MRI using post-mortem MRI and autopsy in foetuses with CNS abnormalities Clin Radiol 59 2004 1114 1120
8. PD Griffiths, D Variend, M Evans et al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24 2003 22 27
9. AC Breeze, FA Jessop, PA Set et al. Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37 2011 317 323
10. M Cannie, C Votino, P Moerman et al. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39 2012 659 665
11. D Wichmann, F Obbelode, H Vogel et al. Virtual autopsy as an alternative to traditional medical autopsy in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study Ann Intern Med 156 2012 123 130
12. S Thayyil Less invasive autopsy: an evidenced based approach Arch Dis Child 96 2011 681 687
13. PJ Woodward, R Sohaey, DP Harris et al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 1997 41 46
14. TA Huisman, J Wisser, T Stallmach, GP Krestin, R Huch, RAC Kubik-Huch MR autopsy in fetuses Fetal Diagn Ther 17 2002 58 64
15. S Thayyil, M Chandrasekaran, LS Chitty et al. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review Eur J Radiol 75 2010 e142 e148
16. S Thayyil, NJ Robertson, A Scales et al. Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model Arch Dis Child 94 2009 354 358
17. S Thayyil, NJ Robertson, A Scales, NJ Sebire, AM Taylor Parental consent for research and sudden infant death Lancet 372 2008 715
18. S Thayyil, NJ Sebire, LS Chitty, A Wade, O Olsen, RS Gunny et al. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol) BMC Pediatr 11 2011 120
19. GN Rutty, G Brogdon, F Dedouit et al. Terminology used in publications for post-mortem cross-sectional imaging Int J Legal Med 2012 10.1007/s00414-012-0782-7 published online Oct 18.
20. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Guidleines for autopsy investigation of fetal and perinatal death http://www.rcpath.org/Resources/ RCPath/Migrated%20Resources/Documents/A/appendix-6.pdf 2002 Sept, (accessed Jan 10, 2013).
21. The Royal College of Pathologists and The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Sudden unexpected death in infancy: a multi-agency protocol for care and investigation http://www.rcpath.org/NR/rdonlyres/30213EB6-451B-4830- A7FD-4EEFF0420260/0/SUDIreportforweb.pdf 2004 Sept, (accessed Jan 10, 2013).
22. MA Weber, JW Pryce, MT Ashworth, M Malone, NJ Sebire Histological examination in sudden unexpected death in infancy: evidence base for histological sampling J Clin Pathol 65 2012 58 63
23. JW Pryce, SM Paine, MA Weber, B Harding, TS Jacques, NJ Sebire Role of routine neuropathological examination for determining cause of death in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI) J Clin Pathol 65 2012 257 261
24. AC Breeze, FA Jessop, AL Whitehead et al. Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy Virchows Arch 452 2008 201 207
25. NJ Sebire, MA Weber, S Thayyil, I Mushtaq, A Taylor, LS Chitty Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination ("keyhole autopsy"): feasibility and initial experience J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25 2012 513 518
26. T Lavanya, M Cohen, SV Gandhi, T Farrell, EH Whitby A case of a Dandy-Walker variant: the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach using complementary techniques to obtain accurate diagnostic information Br J Radiol 81 2008 e242 e245
27. ME Alderliesten, J Peringa, VP van der Hulst, HL Blaauwgeers, JMC van Lith Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice BJOG 110 2003 378 382
28. IS Roberts, RE Benamore, EW Benbow et al. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study Lancet 379 2012 136 142
29. C Votino, M Cannie, V Segers et al. Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39 2012 679 684
30. SG Ross, MJ Thali, S Bolliger, T Germerott, TD Ruder, PM Flach Sudden death after chest pain: feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT angiography and biopsy Radiol 264 2012 250 259
31. AC Weustink, MG Hunink, CF van Dijke, NS Renken, GP Krestin, JW Oosterhuis Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiol 250 2009 897 904
32. S Thayyil, JO Cleary, NJ Sebire et al. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9·4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy Lancet 374 2009 467 475
33. NHS Implementation Sub-Group of the Department of Health Post Mortem Forensic and Disaster Imaging Group Can cross-sectional imaging as an adjunct and/or alternative to the invasive autopsy be implemented within the NHS? http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/10/less-invasive-autopsy/ 2012 August, (accessed Oct 30, 2012).