COmparision of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates

Fetal and Pediatric Pathology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 139-150

  Garg, Sonu ^a   Punia, R P S ^a   Basu, Srikanta ^a   Mohan, Harsh ^a   Bal, Amanjit ^a  

^a GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Autopsy; Needle autopsy; Neonates

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; BRAIN; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY; LIVER; LUNG; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NEWBORN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPLEEN; TISSUE SECTION; CONGENITAL DISORDER; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FETUS DEATH; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREMATURITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AUTOPSY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; FETAL DEATH; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 66149142194     PISSN: 15513815     EISSN: 15513823     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15513810902772482     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kumar P, Angst DB, Taxy J, Mangurten HH. Neonatal autopsies-a 10 year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:38-42, 2000.
2. King DW. Potential of the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108:439-443, 1984.
3. Roberts ISD, Benbow EW. The autopsy: complete or not? Histopathology 42:417-423, 2003.
4. Underwood JCE, Slater DN, Parsons MA. The needle necropsy. Br Med J 286:1632-1634, 1983.
5. Baumgart KW, Quin JW, Gatenby PA. The limited (needle biopsy) autopsy: a prospect for revival [letter]. Med J Aust 153:301, 1990.
6. Foroudi F, Cheong K, Duflou J. A comparison of the needle biopsy postmortem with the conventional autopsy. Pathology 27:79-82, 1995.
7. Underwood JCE. The future of the autopsy. In The Hospital Autopsy, 2nd ed. Durton J, Rutty G eds. London: Arnold, pp. 7-12, 2001.
8. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000-1005, 1983.
9. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, et al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR 168:41-46, 1997.
10. Lee REJ, Wright C. Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child 89:285-288, 2004.
11. Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social medicine, 18th ed. Jabalpur: M/s Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers, pp. 383-437, 2005.
12. Kalousek DK, Barness EG. Causes of stillbirth and neonatal death. In Potter's Pathology of the Fetus and Infant. 3rd ed. Barness EG, ed. St. Louis: Mosby, pp. 128-162, 1996.
13. Wellman KF. The needle autopsy: a retrospective evaluation of 394 consecutive cases. Am J Clin Pathol 52:441-444, 1969.
14. Houston BM, Malouf NN, Azar HA. Percutaneous needle autopsy sampling. Mod Pathol 9:1101-1107, 1996.
15. Terry R. Needle necropsy. J Clin Pathol 8:38, 1955.
16. West M, Chomet B. An evaluation of needle necropsies. Am J Med Sci 234:554-560, 1957.
17. Kay MH, Moodie DS, Sterba R, et al. The values of autopsy in congenital heart disease. Clin Pediatr 30:450-454, 1991.
18. Kumar P, Taxy J, Angst DB, Mangurten HH. Autopsies in children: Are they still useful? Arch Pediatr Adolesc 152:558-563, 1998.