CLImAT: Accurate detection of copy number alteration and loss of heterozygosity in impure and aneuploid tumor samples using whole-genome sequencing data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 2576-2583

  Yu, Zhenhua ^a   Liu, Yuanning ^a   Shen, Yi ^a   Wang, Minghui ^a   Li, Ao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER;

ANEUPLOIDY; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; LOSS OF HETEROZYGOSITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE; TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84907525236     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu346     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albertson, D.G. et al. (2003) Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nat. Genet., 34, 369-376.
2. Anders, S. and Huber, W. (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol., 11, R106.
3. Bignell, G.R. et al. (2010) Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature, 463, 893-898.
4. Boeva, V. et al. (2011) Control-free calling of copy number alterations in deep-sequencing data using GC-content normalization. Bioinformatics, 27, 268-269.
5. Boeva, V. et al. (2012) Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 28, 423-425.
6. Bolstad, B.M. et al. (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics, 19, 185-193.
7. Caren, H. et al. (2010) High-risk neuroblastoma tumors with 11q-deletion display a poor prognostic, chromosome instability phenotype with later onset. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 4323-4328.
8. Carter, S.L. et al. (2012) Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol., 30, 413-421.
9. Duan, J. et al. (2013) Comparative studies of copy number variation detection methods for next-generation sequencing technologies. PLoS One, 8, e59128.
10. Goya, R. et al. (2010) SNVMix: predicting single nucleotide variants from next-generation sequencing of tumors. Bioinformatics, 26, 730-736.
11. Gusnanto, A. et al. (2012) Correcting for cancer genome size and tumour cell content enables better estimation of copy number alterations from next-generation sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28, 40-47.
12. Ha, G. et al. (2012) Integrative analysis of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity and monoallelic expression at nucleotide resolution reveals disrupted pathways in triple-negative breast cancer. Genome Res., 22, 1995-2007.
13. Kim, S. et al. (2013) Virmid: accurate detection of somatic mutations with sample impurity inference. Genome Biol., 14, R90.
14. Langmead, B. et al. (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol., 10, R25.
15. Li, H. and Durbin, R. (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25, 1754-1760.
16. Li, H. et al. (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079.
17. Li, A. et al. (2011) GPHMM: an integrated hidden Markov model for identification of copy number alteration and loss of heterozygosity in complex tumor samples using whole genome SNP arrays. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, 4928-4941.
18. Mardis, E.R. (2008) Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., 9, 387-402.
19. Mayrhofer, M. et al. (2013) Patchwork: allele-specific copy number analysis of whole genome sequenced tumor tissue. Genome Biol., 14, R24.
20. Metzker, M.L. (2009) Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 31-46.
21. Morozova, O. and Marra, M.A. (2008) Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics, 92, 255-264.
22. Oesper, L. et al. (2013) THetA: Inferring intra-tumor heterogeneity from high-throughput DNA sequencing data. Genome Biol., 14, R80.
23. Park, P.J. (2008) Experimental design and data analysis for array comparative gen-omic hybridization. Cancer Invest., 26, 923-928.
24. Peiffer, D.A. et al. (2006) High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res., 16, 1136-1148.
25. Rabiner, L.R. (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE, 77, 257-286.
26. Sathirapongsasuti, J.F. et al. (2011) Exome sequencing-based copy-number variation and loss of heterozygosity detection: exomeCNV. Bioinformatics, 27, 2648-2654.
27. Schuster, S.C. (2007) Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nature, 200, 8.
28. Shah, S.P. et al. (2012) The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature, 486, 395-399.
29. Sherry, S.T. et al. (2001) dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 308-311.
30. Stephens, P.J. et al. (2009) Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature, 462, 1005-1010.
31. Stratton, M.R. et al. (2009) The cancer genome. Nature, 458, 719-724.
32. Suzuki, S. et al. (2000) An approach to analysis of large-scale correlations between genome changes and clinical endpoints in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res., 60, 5382-5385.
33. Van Loo, P. et al. (2010) Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 16910-16915.
34. Xi, R. et al. (2011) Copy number variation detection in whole-genome sequencing data using the Bayesian information criterion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108, E1128-E1136.
35. Yoon, S. et al. (2009) Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res., 19, 1586-1592.
36. Zhou, X.Z. et al. (2011) The telomerase inhibitor PinX1 is a major haploinsufficient tumor suppressor essential for chromosome stability in mice. J. Clin. Invest., 121, 1266.