Systems responses to progressive water stress in durum wheat

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Habash, Dimah Z ^a,g   Baudo, Marcela ^a   Hindle, Matthew ^a   Powers, Stephen J ^a   Defoin Platel, Michael ^a   Mitchell, Rowan ^a   Saqi, Mansoor ^a   Rawlings, Chris ^a   Latiri, Kawther ^b   Araus, Jose L ^c   Abdulkader, Ahmad ^d   Tuberosa, Roberto ^e   Lawlor, David W ^a   Nachit, Miloudi M ^f  

^a ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CARTHAGE   (Tunisia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research   (Syrian Arab Republic)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^f INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE DRY AREAS ICARDA   (Syrian Arab Republic)

^g Securewheat Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSCISIC ACID; PLANT RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; WATER;

ARTICLE; BREEDING LINE; DROUGHT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; OSMOSIS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT GENE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PLANT METABOLISM; RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAIN; RNA ISOLATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TRITICUM DURUM; WATER CONTENT; WATER STRESS; WHEAT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT STOMA; WATER DEPRIVATION;

TRITICUM TURGIDUM SUBSP. DURUM;

ABSCISIC ACID; DROUGHTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRITICUM; WATER; WATER DEPRIVATION;

EID: 84907484138     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108431     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Nachit MM, Nachit G, Ketata H, Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1992) Use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyze genotype-byenvironment interaction in durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet 83: 597-601
2. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann. Bot. 89, Special No, 925-940
3. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Alexander LV, Allen SK, et al. (2013) Technical Summary. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V and Midgley PM, editors. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
4. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP, Eds. (2008) Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva
5. Hoerling M, Eischeid J, Perlwitz J, Quan X, Zhang T, et al. (2012) On the Increased Frequency of Mediterranean Drought. J Clim 25: 2146-2161
6. Habash DZ, Kehel K, Nachit MM (2009) Genomic approaches for designing durum wheat ready for climate change with a focus on drought. J. Exp. Bot. 60: 2805-2815
7. WHEAT (2011) Global alliance for improving food security and the livelihoods of the resource-poor in the developing world. CIMMYT publication, Mexico
8. Nachit MM, Elouafi I (2004) Durum adaptation in the Mediterranean dryland: breeding, stress physiology, and molecular markers. In: Rao SC, Ryan J, editors. Challenges and strategies for dryland agriculture. CSSA Special Publication 32. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: Crop Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy Inc, 203-218
9. Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Corneti S, Araus JL, Salem MB, et al. (2008) Quantitative Trait Loci for grain yield and adaptation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) across a wide range of water availability. Genetics 178: 489-511
10. Moinuddin, Fischer RA, Sayre KD, Reynolds MP (2005). Osmotic Adjustment in Wheat in Relation to Grain Yield under Water Deficit Environments. Agron. J. 97: 1062-1071
11. Alvarez S, Marsh EL, Schroeder SG, Schachtman DP (2008) Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 31: 325-340
12. Harb A, Krishnan A, Ambavaram MMR, Pereira A (2010) Molecular and Physiological Analysis of Drought Stress in Arabidopsis Reveals Early Responses Leading to Acclimation in Plant Growth. Plant Physiol. 154: 1254-1271
13. Ahuja I, de Vos R, Bones AM, Hall RD (2010) Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci. 15: 664-674
14. Mochida K, Shinozaki K (2010) Genomics and Bioinformatics Resources for Crop Improvement. Plant Cell Physiol. 51: 497-523
15. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1994) A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low temperature, or high-salt stress. Plant Cell 6: 251-264
16. Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2009) Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Response to Abiotic Stresses in Arabidopsis and Grasses1. Plant Physiol. 149: 88-95
17. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 221-227
18. Reguera M, Peleg Z, Blumwald E (2011) Targeting metabolic pathways for genetic engineering abiotic stress-tolerance in crops. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012: 186-94
19. Tuberosa R, Salvi S (2006) Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 11: 405-12
20. Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck F, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo A, et al. (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 105: 1-14
21. Fleury D, Jefferies S, Kuchel H, Langridge P (2010) Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 61: 3211-3222
22. Aprile A, Mastrangelo A, De Leonardis A, Galiba G, Roncaglia E, et al. (2009) Transcriptional profiling in response to terminal drought stress reveals differential responses along the wheat genome. BMC Genomics, 10: 279
23. Lawlor DW (2013) Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. J Exp Bot. 64: 83-108
24. Barr HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 15: 413-428
25. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Hemmingsen EA, Bradstreet ED (1964) Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 52: 119-25
26. Fernandez-Garcia N, Hernandez M, Casado-Vela J, Bru R, Elortza F, et al. (2011) Changes to the proteome and targeted metabolites of xylem sap in Brassica oleracea in response to salt stress. Plant Cell Environ. 34: 821-836
27. Wu ZJ, Irizarry RA, Gentleman R, Martinez-Murillo F, Spencer F (2004) A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays. J Am Stat Assoc 99: 909-917
28. Bar-Joseph Z (2004) Analyzing time series gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 20: 2493-2503
29. Mastroianni G, Milovanovic G (2008) Interpolation Processes: Basic Theory and Applications. Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
30. Gasca M, Sauer T (2000) On the history of multivariate polynomial interpolation, J Comput Appl Math 122: 23-25
31. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B 57: 289-300
32. Krzanowski WJ (2000) Principles of multivariate analysis: A user's perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
33. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA (2004) affy-analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20: 307-315
34. Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, et al. (2004) MAPMAN: A user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37: 914-39
35. Usadel B, Nagel N, Thimm O, Redestig H, Blaesing OE, et al. (2005) Extension of the Visualization Tool MapMan to Allow Statistical Analysis of Arrays, Display of Coresponding Genes, and Comparison with Known Responses. Plant Physiol 138: 1195-1204
36. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, Chapman S, Bower NI, Way H, et al. (2006) Differential gene expression of wheat progeny with contrasting levels of transpiration efficiency. Plant Mol. Biol. 61: 863-81
37. Kilian J, Whitehead D, Horak J, Wanke D, Weinl S, et al. (2007) The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J. 50: 347-63
38. Talamè V, Ozturk NZ, Bohnert HJ, Tuberosa R (2007) Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments: A comparative analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 229-240
39. Degenkolbe T, Do PT, Zuther E, Repsilber D, Walther D, et al. (2009) Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 69: 133-53
40. Ergen NZ, Thimmapuram J, Bohnert HJ, Budak H (2009). Transcriptome pathways unique to dehydration tolerant relatives of modern wheat. Funct. Integr. Genomics 9: 377-396
41. Krugman T, Chagué V, Peleg Z, Balzergue S, Just J, et al. (2010) Multilevel regulation and signalling processes associated with adaptation to terminal drought in wild emmer wheat. Funct Integr Genomics 10: 167-186
42. Cramer G R, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K (2011) Effects of abiotic stress on plants: A systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol. 11: 163
43. Hirayama T, Shinozaki K (2010) Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post- genome era: past, present and future. Plant J. 61: 1041-1052
44. Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 9: 244-252
45. Kitano H (2007) Towards a theory of biological robustness. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3: 137
46. Whitacre JM (2012) Biological robustness: paradigms, mechanisms, and systems principles. Front Genet. 11; 3: 67
47. Claverie JM (1999) Computational methods for the identification of differential and coordinated gene expression. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8(10): 1821-32
48. Pinheiro C, Chaves MM (2011). Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J. Exp. Bot. 62: 869-882
49. Swarbreck SM, Defoin-Platel M, Hindle M, Saqi M, Habash DZ (2010) New perspectives on glutamine synthetase in grasses. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 1511-1522
50. Lawlor DW, Tezara W (2009) Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: A critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Ann. Bot. 103: 561-579
51. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, Glassop D, Shorter R (2008) Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 67: 197-214
52. van Dongen JT, Gupta KJ, Ramírez-Aguilar SJ, Araú jo WL, Nunes-Nesi A, et al. (2011) Regulation of respiration in plants: A role for alternative metabolic pathways. J. Plant Physiol. 168: 1434-43
53. Rosa M, Prado C, Podazza G, Interdonato R, González JA, et al. (2009) Soluble sugars-Metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress. Plant Signal Behav. 4: 388-393
54. Miflin BJ, Habash DZ (2002) The role of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation and possibilities for improvement in the nitrogen utilization of crops. J Exp Bot. 53: 979-87
55. Konno H, Yamasaki Y, Sugimoto M, Takeda K (2008) Differential changes in cell wall matrix polysaccharides and glycoside-hydrolyzing enzymes in developing wheat seedlings differing in drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 165: 745-54
56. Moura JC, Bonine CA, de Oliveira Fernandes Viana J, Dornelas MC, Mazzafera P (2010) Abiotic and biotic stresses and changes in the lignin content and composition in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 52: 360-76
57. Sasidharan R, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2011) Cell wall modifying proteins mediate plant acclimatization to biotic and abiotic Stresses, CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 30: 6, 548-562
58. Moumeni A, Satoh K, Kondoh H, Asano T, Hosaka A, et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles of two pairs of droughttolerant and susceptible rice near-isogenic lines under different drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 11: 174
59. Gan X, Stegle O, Behr J, Steffen JG, Drewe P, et al. (2011) Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 477: 419-423
60. Guo WJ, Ho TH (2008) An abscisic acid-induced protein, HVA22, inhibits gibberellin-mediated programmed cell death in cereal aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 147: 1710-22
61. Zheng J, Fu J, Gou M, Huai J, Liu Y, et al. (2010) Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of two maize inbred lines under drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 72: 407-21
62. Hayano-Kanashiro C, Calderón-Vázquez C, Ibarra-Laclette E, Herrera-Estrella L, Simpson J (2009) Analysis of Gene Expression and Physiological Responses in Three Mexican Maize Landraces under Drought Stress and Recovery Irrigation. PLoS ONE 4: e7531
63. Monneveux P, Rekika D, Acevedo E, Merah O (2006) Effect of drought on leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, transpiration efficiency and productivity in field grown durum wheat genotypes. Plant Sci. 170: 867-872
64. Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu ZM, Condon AG, et al. (1998) Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies. Crop Sci. 38: 1467-1475
65. Araus JL, Casadesus J, Bort J (2001) Recent Tools for the Screening of Physiological Traits Determining Yield. In Reynolds, MP, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, McNab A (eds.). Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT
66. Reynolds MP, Nagarajan S, Razzaque MA, Ageeb OAA (2001) Heat tolerance. In Reynolds, MP, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, McNab A (eds.). Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT. 88-100
67. Blum A (1996) Yield potential and drought resistance: Are they mutually exclusive? In:. Reynolds MP, Rajaram S, McNab A (eds.). Increasing Yield Potential in Wheat: Breaking the Barriers. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT. 76-89
68. Delgado MI, Reynolds MP, Larque-saavedra A, Nava T (1994) Mexico, Genetic diversity for photosynthesis in wheat under heat-stressed environments and its relationship to productivity. Wheat Special Report No. 30, CIMMYT, Mexico
69. Brennan JP, Condon AG, Van Ginkel M, Reynolds MP (2007) An economic assessment of the use of physiological selection for stomatal aperture-related traits in the CIMMYT wheat breeding programme. J Agric Sci. 145: 187-194
70. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 55: 2447-2460
71. Giunta F, Motzo R, Pruneddu G (2008) Has long-term selection for yield in durum wheat also induced changes in leaf and canopy traits? Field Crops Res. 106: 68-76
72. Bahar B, Yildirim M, Barutcular C (2009) Relationships between stomatal conductance and yield components in spring durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 37: 45-48
73. Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Watt M, Condon AG, Spielmeyer W, et al. (2010) Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37, 85-97
74. Khamssi NN, Najaphy A (2012) Comparison of photosynthetic components of wheat genotypes under rain-fed and irrigated conditions. Photochem. Photobiol. 88: 76-80