Active learning materials for molecular and atomic spectroscopy

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Volumn 406, Issue 22, 2014, Pages 5245-5248

  Wenzel, Thomas J ^a  

^a BATES COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY; DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

ACTIVE LEARNING; ANALYTICAL SCIENCE; BASIC CONCEPTS; CREATIVE COMMONS; LEARNING OBJECTIVES; RESEARCH STUDIES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84907339828     PISSN: 16182642     EISSN: 16182650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-7991-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Pollio H (1984) What students think about and do in college lecture classes. In Teaching-Learning Issues; University of Tennessee, Learning Research Center: Knoxville, 3-18
2. Penner JG (1984) Why many college teachers cannot lecture: how to avoid communication breakdown in the classroom. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield
3. Stuart J, Rutherford RJD (1978) Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet 2:514-516
4. Verner C, Dickinson G (1967) The lecture: an analysis and review of research. J Educ Psychol 17:85-100
5. Wenzel TJ (1999) The lecture as a learning device. Anal Chem 71:817A-819A
6. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA (1991) Cooperative Learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 4, The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Washington, DC
7. Cooper MM (2014) Evidence-based reform of teaching and learning. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:1-4
8. Bodner GM (1986) Constructivism: a theory of knowledge. J Chem Educ 63:873-877
9. Novak JD (1977) A theory of education. Cornell University, Ithaca
10. Bretz SL (2001) Novak's theory of education: human constructivism and meaningful learning. J Chem Educ. doi: 10.1021/ed078p1107.6
11. Ausubel DP (1968) Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York
12. Singer SR, Nielsen NR, Schweingruber HA (2012) Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press, Washington DC
13. Teichert MA, Stacy AM (2002) Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanation and integration of ideas. J Res Sci Teach 39:464-496
14. Cooper MM, Cox CT, Nammouz M, Case E, Stevens R (2008) An assessment of the effect of collaborative groups on students' problem solving strategies and abilities. J Chem Educ 85:866-872
15. Bransford J, Brown AL, Cocking RR (2000) How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
16. Murray HG (1985) In: Donald JG, Sullivan AM (eds) Using research to improve teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
17. Blosser PE (1993) The science outlook: using cooperative learning in science education. ERIC-CSMEE, Columbus, pp 1-9
18. Allen DE, Duch BJ, Groh SE (1996) New directions in teaching and learning, vol 68. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, pp 43-52
19. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan S (1997) Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis. National Institute for Science Education: Madison, WI, http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/CL1/CL/resource/R2.htm. Accessed 10 May 2014
20. Spencer JN (1999) New directions in teaching chemistry: a philosophical and pedagogical basis. J Chem Educ 76:566-569
21. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Stanne ME (2000) Cooperative learning methods: a meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: Cooperative Learning Center, http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2014
22. Bowen CW (2000) A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. J Chem Educ 77:116-119
23. Terenzini PT, Cabrera AF, Colbeck CL, Parente JM, Bjorklund SA (2001) Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: students' reported learning gains. J Eng Educ 90:123-130
24. Gosser DK, Cracolice MS, Kampmeier JA, Roth V, Strozak VS, Varma-Nelson P (eds) (2001) Peer-led team learning: a guidebook. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
25. Cabrera AF, Crissman JL, Bernal EM, Nora A, Terenzini PT, Pascarella ET (2002) Collaborative learning: its impact on college students' development and diversity. J Coll Stud Dev 43:20-34
26. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS (1999) Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 69:21-51
27. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
28. Wenzel TJ (2011) Active learning materials for equilibrium and separation science. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:637-640
29. Analytical Sciences Digital Library, http://www.asdlib.org. Accessed 10 May 2014; Curriculum materials described herein, http://community.asdlib.org/ activelearningmaterials/. Accessed 10 May 2014
30. Molecular and Atomic Spectroscopy active learning unit, http://www.community.asdlib.org/activelearningmaterials/molecular-and-atomic- spectroscopy/. Accessed 10 May 2014