Increased Aurora B activity causes continuous disruption of kinetochore-microtubule attachments and spindle instability

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 38, 2014, Pages E3996-E4005

  Muñoz Barrera, Marta ^a,b   Monje Casas, Fernando ^a,c  

^a CABIMER Andalusian Center for Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine CSIC University of Seville UPO   (Spain)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

CENTROMERE; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

AURORA KINASE B; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84907283857     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408017111     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Siegel JJ, Amon A (2012) New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28:189-214.
2. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(5):379-393.
3. Carmena M, Wheelock M, Funabiki H, Earnshaw WC (2012) The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): From easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(12):789-803.
4. Nasmyth K, Haering CH (2009) Cohesin: Its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43: 525-558.
5. Pinsky BA, Kung C, Shokat KM, Biggins S (2006) The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 8(1): 78-83.
6. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A (2006) The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127(5): 983-997.
7. DeLuca JG, et al. (2006) Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127(5):969-982.
8. Welburn JP, et al. (2010) Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol Cell 38(3):383-392.
9. Wang E, Ballister ER, Lampson MA (2011) Aurora B dynamics at centromeres create a diffusion-based phosphorylation gradient. J Cell Biol 194(4):539-549.
10. Kotwaliwale CV, Frei SB, Stern BM, Biggins S (2007) A pathway containing the Ipl1/ aurora protein kinase and the spindle midzone protein Ase1 regulates yeast spindle assembly. Dev Cell 13(3):433-445.
11. Pereira G, Schiebel E (2003) Separase regulates INCENP-Aurora B anaphase spindle function through Cdc14. Science 302(5653):2120-2124.
12. Douglas ME, Davies T, Joseph N, Mishima M (2010) Aurora B and 14-3-3 coordinately regulate clustering of centralspindlin during cytokinesis. Curr Biol 20(10):927-933.
13. Buvelot S, Tatsutani SY, Vermaak D, Biggins S (2003) The budding yeast Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase regulates mitotic spindle disassembly. J Cell Biol 160(3):329-339.
14. Woodruff JB, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2010) Mitotic spindle disassembly occurs via distinct subprocesses driven by the anaphase-promoting complex, Aurora B kinase, and kinesin-8. J Cell Biol 191(4):795-808.
15. Mendoza M, et al. (2009) A mechanism for chromosome segregation sensing by the NoCut checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 11(4):477-483.
16. Norden C, et al. (2006) The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage. Cell 125(1):85-98.
17. Steigemann P, et al. (2009) Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell 136(3):473-484.
18. Tatsuka M, et al. (1998) Multinuclearity and increased ploidy caused by overexpression of the aurora- and Ipl1-like midbody-associated protein mitotic kinase in human cancer cells. Cancer Res 58(21):4811-4816.
19. Katayama H, Brinkley WR, Sen S (2003) The Aurora kinases: Role in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22(4):451-464.
20. Katayama H, et al. (1999) Mitotic kinase expression and colorectal cancer progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(13):1160-1162.
21. Ota T, et al. (2002) Increased mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 attributable to AIM-1/Aurora-B overexpression contributes to chromosome number instability. Cancer Res 62(18):5168-5177.
22. Biggins S, et al. (1999) The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev 13(5):532-544.
23. Hsu JY, et al. (2000) Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 is governed by Ipl1/aurora kinase and Glc7/PP1 phosphatase in budding yeast and nematodes. Cell 102(3): 279-291.
24. Li F, Flanary PL, Altieri DC, Dohlman HG (2000) Cell division regulation by BIR1, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family in yeast. J Biol Chem275(10):6707-6711.
25. Monje-Casas F, Prabhu VR, Lee BH, Boselli M, Amon A (2007) Kinetochore orientation during meiosis is controlled by Aurora B and the monopolin complex. Cell 128(3): 477-490.
26. Tanaka TU, et al. (2002) Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108(3):317-329.
27. King EM, Rachidi N, Morrice N, Hardwick KG, Stark MJ (2007) Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is required for the spindle checkpoint response to lack of tension at kinetochores. Genes Dev 21(10):1163-1168.
28. Schuyler SC, Liu JY, Pellman D (2003) The molecular function of Ase1p: Evidence for a MAP-dependent midzone-specific spindle matrix. Microtubule-associated proteins. J Cell Biol 160(4):517-528.
29. Cheeseman IM, et al. (2002) Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111(2):163-172.
30. Biggins S, Murray AW (2001) The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 15(23):3118-3129.
31. Keating P, Rachidi N, Tanaka TU, Stark MJ (2009) Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores. J Cell Sci 122(Pt 23):4375-4382.
32. Shirayama M, Tóth A, Gálová M, Nasmyth K (1999) APC(Cdc20) promotes exit from mitosis by destroying the anaphase inhibitor Pds1 and cyclin Clb5. Nature 402(6758): 203-207.
33. Shirk K, Jin H, Giddings TH, Jr, Winey M, Yu HG (2011) The Aurora kinase Ipl1 is necessary for spindle pole body cohesion during budding yeast meiosis. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 17):2891-2896.
34. Pereira G, Tanaka TU, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E (2001) Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J 20(22):6359-6370.
35. Piatti S, Lengauer C, Nasmyth K (1995) Cdc6 is an unstable protein whose de novo synthesis in G1 is important for the onset of S phase and for preventing a 'reductional' anaphase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 14(15):3788-3799.
36. Bajer AS (1982) Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis. J Cell Biol 93(1):33-48.
37. Severin F, Hyman AA, Piatti S (2001) Correct spindle elongation at the metaphase/ anaphase transition is an APC-dependent event in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 155(5): 711-718.
38. Terada Y, et al. (1998) AIM-1: A mammalian midbody-associated protein required for cytokinesis. EMBO J 17(3):667-676.
39. Petersen J, Paris J, Willer M, Philippe M, Hagan IM (2001) The S. pombe aurora-related kinase Ark1 associates with mitotic structures in a stage dependent manner and is required for chromosome segregation. J Cell Sci 114(Pt 24):4371-4384.
40. Valerio-Santiago M, Monje-Casas F (2011) Tem1 localization to the spindle pole bodies is essential for mitotic exit and impairs spindle checkpoint function. J Cell Biol 192(4):599-614.
41. Nairz K, Klein F (1997) mre11S-a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 11(17):2272-2290.
42. D'Aquino KE, et al. (2005) The protein kinase Kin4 inhibits exit from mitosis in response to spindle position defects. Mol Cell 19(2):223-234.