Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity

Structure

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1471-1480

  Shimamura, Tatsuro ^a   Koike Takeshita, Ayumi ^b   Yokoyama, Ken ^c   Masui, Ryoji ^d   Murai, Noriyuki ^b   Yoshida, Masasuke ^b,c   Taguchi, Hideki ^b,c   Iwata, So ^a,c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^d OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENCAPSULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THERMUS; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROEL PROTEIN; GROES PROTEIN; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; NEGIBACTERIA; THERMUS; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS;

EID: 4143134164     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aoki K., Motojima F., Taguchi H., Yomo T., Yoshida M. GroEL binds artificial proteins with random sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;13755-13758
2. Ashcroft A.E., Brinker A., Coyle J.E., Weber F., Kaiser M., Moroder L., Parsons M.R., Jager J., Hartl U.F., Hayer-Hartl M., et al. Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;33115-33126
3. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586
4. Braig K., Adams P.D., Brünger A.T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1083-1094
5. Brinker A., Pfeifer G., Kerner M.J., Naylor D.J., Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell. 107:2001;223-233
6. Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., DeLano W.L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Jiang J.S., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N.S., et al. Crystallography & NMR system. a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54:1998;905-921
7. Buckle A.M., Zahn R., Fersht A.R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3571-3575
8. Bukau B., Horwich A.L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 92:1998;351-366
9. CCP4 Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4) The CCP4 suite. program for protein crystallography Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50:1994;760-763
10. Chaudhry C., Farr G.W., Todd M.J., Rye H.S., Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES. function, structure and energetics EMBO J. 22:2003;4877-4887
11. Chen L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex. plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity Cell. 99:1999;757-768
12. Cliff M.J., Kad N.M., Hay N., Lund P.A., Webb M.R., Burston S.G., Clarke A.R. A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 293:1999;667-684
13. Danziger O., Rivenzon-Segal D., Wolf S.G., Horovitz A. Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155→Ala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2003;13797-13802
14. Esnouf R.M. An extensively modified version of MolScript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capabilities. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 15:1997;132-134
15. Farr G.W., Furtak K., Rowland M.B., Ranson N.A., Saibil H.R., Kirchhausen T., Horwich A.L. Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell. 100:2000;561-573
16. Fenton W.A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619
17. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol. from nascent chain to folded protein Science. 295:2002;1852-1858
18. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 268:1995;1144-1149
19. Houry W.A., Frishman D., Eckerskorn C., Lottspeich F., Hartl F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 402:1999;147-154
20. Hua Q., Dementieva I.S., Walsh M.A., Hallenga K., Weiss M.A., Joachimiak A. A thermophilic mini-chaperonin contains a conserved polypeptide-binding surface. combined crystallographic and NMR studies of the GroEL apical domain with implications for substrate interactions J. Mol. Biol. 306:2001;513-525
21. Hunt J.F., Weaver A.J., Landry S.J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45
22. Inbar E., Horovitz A. GroES promotes the T to R transition of the GroEL ring distal to GroES in the GroEL-GroES complex. Biochemistry. 36:1997;12276-12281
23. Jones T.A., Zou J.Y., Cowan S.W., Kjeldgaard Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A. 47(Pt 2):1991;110-119
24. Kawata Y., Kawagoe M., Hongo K., Miyazaki T., Higurashi T., Mizobata T., Nagai J. Functional communications between the apical and equatorial domains of GroEL through the intermediate domain. Biochemistry. 38:1999;15731-15740
25. Ma J., Sigler P.B., Xu Z., Karplus M. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302:2000;303-313
26. Mayhew M., da Silva A.C.R., Martin J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Hartl F.U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature. 379:1996;420-426
27. Merritt E.A., Bacon D.J. Raster3D. photorealistic molecular graphics Methods Enzymol. 277:1997;505-524
28. Motojima F., Yoshida M. Discrimination of ATP, ADP and AMPPNP by chaperonin GroEL; hexokinase treatment revealed the exclusive role of ATP. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;26648-26654
29. Murai N., Taguchi H., Yoshida M. Kinetic analysis of interactions between GroEL and reduced alpha lactalbumin. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;19957-19963
30. Navaza J. AMoRe. an automated package for molecular replacement Acta Crystallogr. A. 50:1994;157-163
31. Ranson N.A., Farr G.W., Roseman A.M., Gowen B., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L., Saibil H.R. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell. 107:2001;869-879
32. Rye H.S., Burston S.G., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.M., Xu Z., Sigler P.B., Horwich A.L. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 388:1997;792-798
33. Rye H.S., Roseman A.M., Chen S., Furtak K., Fenton W.A., Saibil H.R., Horwich A.L. GroEL-GroES cycling. ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings Cell. 97:1999;325-338
34. Sakikawa C., Taguchi H., Makino Y., Yoshida M. On the maximum size of proteins to stay and fold in the cavity of GroEL underneath GroES. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;21251-21256
35. Shevchenko A., Wilm M., Vorm O., Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68:1996;850-858
36. Shimamura T., Koike-Takeshita A., Yokoyama K., Yoshida M., Taguchi H., Iwata S. Crystallization of the chaperonin GroEL-GroES complex from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59:2003;1632-1634
37. Shtilerman M., Lorimer G.H., Englander S.W. Chaperonin function. folding by forced unfolding Science. 284:1999;822-825
38. Sigler P.B., Xu Z., Rye H.S., Burston S.G., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:1998;581-608
39. Taguchi H., Yoshida M. Chaperonin from thermophile Thermus thermophilus. Methods Enzymol. 290:1998;169-180
40. Taguchi H., Konishi J., Ishii N., Yoshida M. A chaperonin from a thermophilic bacterium, Thermus thermophilus, that controls refolding of several thermophilic enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1991;22411-22418
41. Taguchi H., Ueno T., Tadakuma H., Yoshida M., Funatsu T. Single-molecule observation of protein-protein interactions in the chaperonin system. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;861-865
42. Thirumalai D., Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:2001;245-269
43. Viitanen P.V., Gatenby A.A., Lorimer G.H. Purified GroEL interacts with the non-native states of a multitude of E. coli proteins. Protein Sci. 1:1992;361-369
44. Wang J., Chen L. Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide. J. Mol. Biol. 334:2003;489-499
45. Wang J.D., Herman C., Tipton K.A., Gross C.A., Weissman J.S. Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins. Cell. 111:2002;1027-1039
46. Wang Q., Buckle A.M., Foster N.W., Johnson C.M., Fersht A.R. Design of highly stable functional GroEL minichaperones. Protein Sci. 8:1999;2186-2193
47. Weissman J.S., Hohl C.M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H.R., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. Mechanism of GroEL action. productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES Cell. 83:1995;577-587
48. White H.E., Chen S., Roseman A.M., Yifrach O., Horovitz A., Saibil H.R. Structural basis of allosteric changes in the GroEL mutant Arg197→Ala. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:1997;690-694
49. Xu Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750
50. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196→Ala. J. Mol. Biol. 243:1994;397-401
51. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;5303-5308
52. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255:1996;356-361