Crystal structure of a GroEL-ADP complex in the relaxed allosteric state at 2.7 Å resolution

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 32, 2013, Pages

  Fei, Xue ^a   Yang, Dong ^a,b   LaRonde LeBlanc, Nicole ^a,b   Lorimer, George H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Allostery; Chaperonin; Protein machine

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; GROEL ADP PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PHOSPHATE BINDING PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HYDROLYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE BINDING SITE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STEADY STATE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ALLOSTERY; CHAPERONIN; PROTEIN MACHINE;

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 84881466449     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311996110     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lin Z, Rye HS (2006) GroEL-mediated protein folding: Making the impossible, possible. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 41(4):211-239.
2. Horovitz A, Fridmann Y, Kafri G, Yifrach O (2001) Review: Allostery in chaperonins. J Struct Biol 135(2):104-114.
3. Thirumalai D, Lorimer GH (2001) Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30(2001):245-269.
4. Braig K, Adams PD, Brünger AT (1995) Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution. Nat Struct Biol 2(12):1083-1094.
5. Bartolucci C, Lamba D, Grazulis S, Manakova E, Heumann H (2005) Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL. J Mol Biol 354(4):940-951.
6. Chaudhry C, Horwich AL, Brunger AT, Adams PD (2004) Exploring the structural dynamics of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL using translation-libration- screw crystallographic refinement of intermediate states. J Mol Biol 342(1):229-245.
7. Xu Z, Horwich AL, Sigler PB (1997) The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroELGroES-( ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388(6644):741-750.
8. Yifrach O, Horovitz A (1995) Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34(16):5303-5308.
9. Yifrach O, Horovitz A (1996) Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J Mol Biol 255(3):356-361.
10. Yifrach O, Horovitz A (1994) Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg 196→Ala. J Mol Biol 243(3):397-401.
11. White HE, et al. (1997) Structural basis of allosteric changes in the GroEL mutant Arg197→Ala. Nat Struct Biol 4(9):690-694.
12. Murai N, Makino Y, Yoshida M (1996) GroEL locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain cross-link can bind ATP and polypeptide but cannot process further reaction steps. J Biol Chem 271(45):28229-28234.
13. Grason JP (2004) Allostery in GroEL: Its role in the refolding of protein substrate. PhD thesis (Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD).
14. Clare DK, et al. (2012) ATP-triggered conformational changes delineate substratebinding and -folding mechanics of the GroEL chaperonin. Cell 149(1):113-123.
15. + and substrate protein on ATP hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(45):17334-17338.
16. Brune M, et al. (1998) Mechanism of inorganic phosphate interaction with phosphate binding protein from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 37(29):10370-10380.
17. Grason JP, Gresham JS, Lorimer GH (2008) Setting the chaperonin timer: A two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(45):17339-17344.
18. Sameshima T, et al. (2008) Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle. J Biol Chem 283(35):23765-23773.
19. Fridmann Y, Kafri G, Danziger O, Horovitz A (2002) Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES. Biochemistry 41(18):5938-5944.
20. Shimamura T, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity. Structure 12(8):1471-1480.
21. Danziger O, Rivenzon-Segal D, Wolf SG, Horovitz A (2003) Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155 → Ala. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(24):13797-13802.
22. Hyeon C, Lorimer GH, Thirumalai D (2006) Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(50):18939-18944.
23. Wang J, Boisvert DC (2003) Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0A resolution. J Mol Biol 327(4): 843-855.
24. Todd MJ, Viitanen PV, Lorimer GH (1994) Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: Implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265(5172):659-666.
25. Frank GA, et al. (2010) Out-of-equilibrium conformational cycling of GroEL under saturating ATP concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(14):6270-6274.
26. Chen L, Sigler PB (1999) The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: Plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell 99(7):757-768.
27. Farr GW, et al. (2000) Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell 100(5):561-573.
28. Viitanen PV, Gatenby AA, Lorimer GH (1992) Purified chaperonin 60 (groEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci 1(3): 363-369.
29. Rivenzon-Segal D, Wolf SG, Shimon L, Willison KR, Horovitz A (2005) Sequential ATPinduced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12(3):233-237.
30. Chen DH, et al. (2013) Visualizing GroEL/ES in the act of encapsulating a folding protein. Cell 153(6):1354-1365.
31. Kalisman N, Schröder GF, Levitt M (2013) The crystal structures of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT reveal its functional partitioning. Structure 21(4):540-549.
32. Barlow DJ, Thornton JM (1983) Ion-pairs in proteins. J Mol Biol 168(4):867-885.
33. Kumar S, Nussinov R (2002) Relationship between ion pair geometries and electrostatic strengths in proteins. Biophys J 83(3):1595-1612.