Absence of SUN-domain protein Slp1 blocks karyogamy and switches meiotic recombination and synapsis from homologs to sister chromatids

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 38, 2014, Pages E4015-E4023

  Vasnier, Christelle ^a   De Muyt, Arnaud ^a,b   Zhang, Liangran ^c   Tessé, Sophie ^a   Kleckner, Nancy E ^c   Zickler, Denise ^a   Espagne, Eric ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY OF THE CELL I2BC   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Recombination synapsis; Sisters versus homologs

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN;

CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SORDARIALES;

CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HAPLOIDY; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SORDARIALES;

EID: 84907212681     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415758111     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Reinsch S, Gönczy P (1998) Mechanisms of nuclear positioning. J Cell Sci 111(Pt 16): 2283-2295.
2. Rose MD (1996) Nuclear fusion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12:663-695.
3. Melloy P, Shen S, White E., Rose MD (2009) Distinct roles for key karyogamy proteins during yeast nuclear fusion. Mol Biol Cell 20(17):3773-3782.
4. Gibeaux R, Politi AZ, Nédélec F, Antony C, Knop M (2013) Spindle pole body-anchored Kar3 drives the nucleus along microtubules from another nucleus in preparation for nuclear fusion during yeast karyogamy. Genes Dev 27(3):335-349.
5. Martín-Castellanos C., et al. (2005) A large-scale screen in S. pombe identifies seven novel genes required for critical meiotic events. Curr Biol 15(22):2056-2062.
6. Makio T, Nishikawa S, Nakayama T., Nagai H, Endo T (2008) Identification and characterization of a Jem1p ortholog of Candida albicans: Dissection of Jem1p functions in karyogamy and protein quality control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells 13(10):1015-1026.
7. Polakova S, Benko Z, Zhang L., Gregan J. (2014) Mal3, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of EB1, is required for karyogamy and for promoting oscillatory nuclear movement during meiosis. Cell Cycle 13(1):72-77.
8. Lee SC, Heitman J. (2012) Function of Cryptococcus neoformans KAR7 (SEC66) in karyogamy during unisexual and opposite-sex mating. Eukaryot Cell 11(6):783-794.
9. Gutz H (1967) "Twin meiosis" and other ambivalences in the life cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Science 158(3802):796-798.
10. Yamashita A, Fujita Y, Yamamoto M. (2013) Proper microtubule structure is vital for timely progression through meiosis in fission yeast. PLoS ONE 8(6):e65082.
11. Tange Y, et al. (1998) A novel fission yeast gene, tht1+, is required for the fusion of nuclear envelopes during karyogamy. J Cell Biol 140(2):247-258.
12. Hiraoka Y, Dernburg AF (2009) The SUN rises on meiotic chromosome dynamics. Dev Cell 17(5):598-605.
13. Roemer FW, et al. (2011) Phenotypic characterization of skeletal abnormalities of Osteopotentia mutant mice by micro-CT: A descriptive approach with emphasis on reconstruction techniques. Skeletal Radiol 40(8):1073-1078.
14. Shimada N, Inouye K, Sawai S., Kawata T. (2010) SunB, a novel Sad1 and UNC-84 domain-containing protein required for development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Dev Growth Differ 52(7):577-590.
15. Friederichs JM, et al. (2012) Genetic analysis of Mps3 SUN domain mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals an interaction with the SUN-like protein Slp1. G3 (Bethesda) 2:1703-1718.
16. Jonikas MC, et al. (2009) Comprehensive characterization of genes required for protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 323(5922):1693-1697.
17. Sohaskey ML, et al. (2010) Osteopotentia regulates osteoblast maturation, bone formation, and skeletal integrity in mice. J Cell Biol 189(3):511-525.
18. Coppock DL, Cina-Poppe D, Gilleran S. (1998) The quiescin Q6 gene (QSCN6) is a fusion of two ancient gene families: thioredoxin and ERV1. Genomics 54(3):460-468.
19. Røsok O, Pedeutour F., Odeberg J, Lundeberg J, Aasheim HC (2000) The C1orf9 gene encodes a putative transmembrane member of a novel protein family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 267(3):855-862.
20. De Muyt A, et al. (2014) E3 ligase Hei10: A multifaceted structure-based signaling molecule with roles within and beyond meiosis. Genes Dev 28(10):1111-1123.
21. Nowrousian M, et al. (2010) De novo assembly of a 40 Mb eukaryotic genome from short sequence reads: Sordaria macrospora, a model organism for fungal morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 6(4):e1000891.
22. Murphy SP, Simmons CR, Bass HW (2010) Structure and expression of the maize (Zea mays L.) SUN-domain protein gene family: Evidence for the existence of two divergent classes of SUN proteins in plants. BMC Plant Biol 10:269-2229.
23. Thompson-Coffe C, Zickler D. (1993) Cytoskeleton interactions in the ascus development and sporulation of Sordaria macrospora. J Cell Sci 104:883-898.
24. Espagne E, et al. (2011) Sme4 coiled-coil protein mediates synaptonemal complex assembly, recombinosome relocalization, and spindle pole body morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(26):10614-10619.
25. van Heemst D, James F, Pöggeler S, Berteaux-Lecellier V, Zickler D (1999) Spo76p is a conserved chromosome morphogenesis protein that links the mitotic and meiotic programs. Cell 98(2):261-271.
26. Storlazzi A, et al. (2008) Coupling meiotic chromosome axis integrity to recombination. Genes Dev 22(6):796-809.
27. Storlazzi A, et al. (2010) Recombination proteins mediate meiotic spatial chromosome organization and pairing. Cell 141(1):94-106.
28. Keeney S, Neale MJ (2006) Initiation of meiotic recombination by formation of DNA double-strand breaks: Mechanism and regulation. Biochem Soc Trans 34(Pt 4):523-525.
29. Hunter N (2007) Meiotic recombination. Molecular Genetics of Recombination, Topics in Current Genetics, eds Aguilera A, Rothstein R (Springer, Berlin), Vol 17, pp 381-442.
30. Jaiswal DK, et al. (2014) Membrane-associated proteomics of chickpea identifies Sad1/UNC-84 protein (CaSUN1), a novel component of dehydration signaling. Sci Rep 4:4177.
31. Rothballer A, Kutay U. (2013) The diverse functional LINCs of the nuclear envelope to the cytoskeleton and chromatin. Chromosoma 122(5):415-429.
32. De Massy B, Baudat F, Nicolas A. (1994) Initiation of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(25):11929-11933.
33. Callender TL, Hollingsworth NM (2010) Mek1 suppression of meiotic double-strand break repair is specific to sister chromatids, chromosome autonomous and independent of Rec8 cohesin complexes. Genetics 185(3):771-782.
34. Loidl J, Nairz K, Klein F. (1991) Meiotic chromosome synapsis in a haploid yeast. Chromosoma 100(4):221-228.
35. Wagstaff JE, Klapholz S, Esposito RE (1982) Meiosis in haploid yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79(9):2986-2990.
36. Cervantes MD, Farah JA, Smith GR (2000) Meiotic DNA breaks associated with recombination in S. pombe. Mol Cell 5(5):883-888.
37. Cifuentes M, Rivard M, Pereira L., Chelysheva L, Mercier R (2013) Haploid meiosis in Arabidopsis: Double-strand breaks are formed and repaired but without synapsis and crossovers. PLoS ONE 8(8):e72431.
38. Zhang L, et al. (2014) Topoisomerase II mediates meiotic crossover interference. Nature 511(7511):551-556.
39. Green MM (1968) Some genetic properties of intrachromosomal recombination. Mol Gen Genet 103(3):209-217.
40. Martini E, et al. (2011) Genome-wide analysis of heteroduplex DNA in mismatch repair-deficient yeast cells reveals novel properties of meiotic recombination pathways. PLoS Genet 7(9):e1002305.
41. Pradillo M, Santos JL (2011) The template choice decision in meiosis: Is the sister important? Chromosoma 120(5):447-454.
42. Schwacha A, Kleckner N. (1997) Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: Meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90(6):1123-1135.
43. Goldfarb T, Lichten M. (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol 8(10):e1000520.
44. Oh SD, et al. (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130(2):259-272.
45. Jessop L, Lichten M. (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31(3):313-323.
46. Hong S, et al. (2013) The logic and mechanism of homologous recombination partner choice. Mol Cell 51(4):440-453.
47. Kleckner N, Zhang L, Weiner B., Zickler D. (2011) Meiotic chromosome dynamics. Genome Organization and Function in the Cell Nucleus, Chapter 19, ed Rippe K (Wiley, New York), pp 487-533.
48. Zickler D, Kleckner N. (1999) Meiotic chromosomes: Integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet 33:603-754.
49. Voelkel-Meiman K, Moustafa SS, Lefrançois P, Villeneuve A.M., MacQueen AJ (2012) Full-length synaptonemal complex grows continuously during meiotic prophase in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 8(10):e1002993.
50. Gong Z, et al. (2011) Non-homologous chromosome pairing and crossover formation in haploid rice meiosis. Chromosoma 120(1):47-60.
51. Gillies CB (1974) The nature and extent of synaptonemal complex formation in haploid barley. Chromosoma 48:441-453.
52. Santos J, Jimenez M, Diez M. (1994) Meiosis in haploid rye: Extensive synapsis and low chiasma frequency. Heredity 73:580-588.
53. Jin H, Guacci V, Yu HG (2009) Pds5 is required for homologue pairing and inhibits synapsis of sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. J Cell Biol 186(5):713-725.
54. Xu H, Beasley MD, Warren W.D., van der Horst GT, McKay MJ (2005) Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev Cell 8(6):949-961.
55. Sherwood RK, Scaduto CM, Torres S.E., Bennett RJ (2014) Convergent evolution of a fused sexual cycle promotes the haploid lifestyle. Nature 506(7488):387-390.