Canadian occupational performance measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 727-746

  Nieuwenhuizen, Mieke G ^a   Groot, Sonja De ^a,b   Janssen, Thomas W J ^a,c,e   van Der Maas, Lia C C ^a,d   Beckerman, Heleen ^e  

^a Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center Reade   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d WINDESHEIM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^e VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; Chronic pain; Clinimetrics; Disability; Needs assessment; Occupational therapy; Outcome assessment; Patient participation; Patient satisfaction; Patient centered outcome; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Responsiveness; Validity

Indexed keywords

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

CHRONIC PAIN; CLINIMETRICS; DISABILITY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESPONSIVENESS; VALIDITY;

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY;

ACROMION; ADULT; ARM AMPUTATION; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS; FEMALE; FORCE; FORCE TRANSDUCER; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MECHANICAL TORSION; MECHANICS; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PHYSICAL STRESS; PROSTHETIC SHOULDER CONTROLLER; RANGE OF MOTION; SHOULDER PROSTHESIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TORQUE; TRANSDUCER; YOUNG MODULUS; AGED; CHRONIC PAIN; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; LOW BACK PAIN; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC PAIN; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907058271     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0221     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287-333.[PMID:16095934] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009
2. Stanos S, Houle TT. Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary management of chronic pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006;17(2):435-50.[PMID:16616276] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2005.12.004
3. Dysvik E, Kvaløy JT, Stokkeland R, Natvig GK. The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain management programme managing chronic pain on pain perceptions, health-related quality of life and stages of change—A nonrandomized controlled study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(7): 826-35.[PMID:20036362] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.001
4. Guzmán J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD000963.[PMID:11869581]
5. Williams AC, Nicholas MK, Richardson PH, Pither CE, Justins DM, Chamberlain JH, Harding VR, Ralphs JA, Jones SC, Dieudonné I, et al. Evaluation of a cognitive behavioural programme for rehabilitating patients with chronic pain. Br J Gen Pract. 1993;43(377):513-18.[PMID:8312023]
6. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD002193.[PMID:12804427]
7. Flor H, Fydrich T, Turk DC. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: A meta-analytic review. Pain. 1992;49(2):221-30.[PMID:1535122] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90145-2
8. Scascighini L, Sprott H. Chronic nonmalignant pain: A challenge for patients and clinicians. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4(2):74-81.[PMID:18235536] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0680
9. Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CL. Quality of life studies: Definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 11-23.
10. Cella DF. Measuring quality of life in palliative care. Semin Oncol. 1995;22(2 Suppl 3):73-81.[PMID:7537908]
11. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83.[PMID:1593914] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
12. Chen TH, Li L, Kochen MM. A systematic review: How to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005;6(9):936-40.[PMID:16130199] http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.B0936
13. Ware JE Jr. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:327-54.[PMID:7639876] http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.001551
14. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): New England Medical Center Hospital Health Institute; 1993.
15. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Binda-Sundberg K. Measuring physical disablement: The contextual challenge. Phys Ther. 1994;74(5):443-51.[PMID:8171106]
16. Townsend E. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 1997.
17. Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van KuykMinis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):402-9.[PMID:12785249] http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr635oa
18. Clark NM, Janz NK, Dodge JA, Mosca L, Lin X, Long Q, Little RJ, Wheeler JR, Keteyian S, Liang J. The effect of patient choice of intervention on health outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29(5):679-86.[PMID:18515187] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.002
19. Heyn L, Finset A, Eide H, Ruland CM. Effects of an interactive tailored patient assessment on patient-clinician communication in cancer care. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1): 89-96.[PMID:21919122] http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.2064
20. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Toronto (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2005.
21. Kjeken I, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Uhlig T. Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with hand osteoarthritis: validity, responsiveness, and feasibility. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(5): 709-15.[PMID:15478169] http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.20522
22. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67(1): 22-30.[PMID:10695166] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000841740006700105
23. Persson E, Rivano-Fischer M, Eklund M. Evaluation of changes in occupational performance among patients in a pain management program. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(2):85-91.[PMID:15180223] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970310019142
24. Spadaro A, Lubrano E, Massimiani MP, Gaia P, Perrotta FM, Parsons WJ, Ferrara N, Valesini G. Validity, responsiveness and feasibility of an Italian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(2): 215-22.[PMID:20483043]
25. Wressle E, Lindstrand J, Neher M, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment programme. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(10):497-506.[PMID:12745961] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000090560
26. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71(4):210-22.[PMID:15586853] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100406
27. Colquhoun H, Letts L, Law M, MacDermid J, Edwards M. Feasibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for routine use. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73(2):48-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4276/030802210X12658062793726
28. Boyer G, Hachey R, Mercier J. Perceptions of occupational performance and subjective quality of life in persons with severe mental illness. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2000;15: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J004v15n02_01
29. Carpenter L, Baker GA, Tyldesley B. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome of a pain management program. Can J Occup Ther. 2001; 68(1):16-22.[PMID:11233684] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000841740106800102
30. Chan CC, Lee TM. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occup Ther Int. 1997;4(3):231-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.58
31. Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, Dekker J, Beelen A. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(6):660-67.[PMID:15473118] http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr746oa
32. Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, King G, Rosenbaum P, Russell D, Palisano R, Harris S, Armstrong R, Watt J. Familycentred functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: An emerging practice model. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:83-102.
33. van Meeteren NL, Strato IH, van Veldhoven NH, De Kleijn P, van den Berg HM, Helders PJ. The utility of the Dutch Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 for assessing health status in individuals with haemophilia: A pilot study. Haemophilia. 2000;6(6):664-71.[PMID:11122393] http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2516.2000.00440.x
34. Ripat J, Etcheverry E, Cooper J, Tate RB. A comparison of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Can J Occup Ther. 2001; 68(4):247-53.[PMID:11680919] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000841740106800408
35. Rochman DL, Ray SA, Kulich RJ, Mehta NR, Driscoll S. Validity and utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure in a craniofacial pain center. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2008;28(1):4-11.
36. Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002; 15(4):347-54.[PMID:12449349] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(02)80006-0
37. Verkerk GJ, Wolf MJ, Louwers AM, Meester-Delver A, Nollet F. The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(11):980-88.[PMID:17065541] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215506070703
38. Walsh AD, Kelly JS, Johnson SP, Rajkumar S, Bennetts K. Performance problems of patients with chronic low-back pain and the measurement of patient-centered outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(1):87-93.[PMID:14699282]
39. Chen YH, Rodger S, Polatjko H. Experiences with the COPM and client-centred practice in adult neurorehabilitation in Taiwan. Occup Ther Int. 2002;9(3):167-84.[PMID:12921096] http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.163
40. Effing E, Dirx E, Sleegers EJ, Van Meeteren N. De responsiviteit van de COPM, ARA en SODA voor veranderingen in handvaardigheid bij plastisch-chirurgische handpatienten [The responsiveness of the COPM, ARA, and SODA to detect changes in hand skills of patients after plastic surgery]. Ned Tijd Ergo. 1999;27(3):109-16.Dutch.
41. Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Oud TA, Bolt EM, Maasdam A, Dekker J. Responsiveness of the Canadian occupational performance measure. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(5):517-28.[PMID:21674402] http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.06.0110
42. Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther. 1999;6(26):84-89.
43. Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, Cardol M, Dekker J. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(8):888-94.[PMID:16323388] http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr883oa
44. Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Uhlig T, Mowinckel P, Kvien TK, Finset A. Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(8):1503-9.[PMID:16078326]
45. Pan AW, Chung L, Hsin-Hwei G. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for clients with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10(4):269-77.[PMID:14647540] http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.190
46. Sewell L, Singh S. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: Is it a reliable measure in clients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Br J Occup Ther. 2001;64:305-10.
47. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Clinimetrics and psychometrics: Two sides of the same coin. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1146-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.010
48. Jolles BM, Buchbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(8):791-801.[PMID:16018914] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.012
49. Van Duijn HM, Niezen AA, Cardol M, Corder-Bartels IE, Verkerk GJ. De Nederlandse versie van de Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Amsterdam (the Netherlands): Afdeling Ergotherapie, VU Universitair Medisch Centrum; 1999. Dutch.
50. Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59(3):974.[PMID:6240632] http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.974
51. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217-27.[PMID:8275167] http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730020305
52. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82-87.[PMID:10104738] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000841749005700207
53. Chibnall JT, Tait RC. The Pain Disability Index: Factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(10):1082-86.[PMID:7944912] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90082-5
54. Grönblad M, Järvinen E, Hurri H, Hupli M, Karaharju EO. Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain. Clin J Pain. 1994;10(3):197-203.[PMID:7833577] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199409000-00005
55. Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, Duckro PN, Krause SJ. The Pain Disability Index: Psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(7):438-41.[PMID:3606368]
56. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Verrips E. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11):1055-68.[PMID:9817123] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00097-3
57. Wittink H, Turk DC, Carr DB, Sukiennik A, Rogers W. Comparison of the redundancy, reliability, and responsiveness to change among SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, and Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Clin J Pain. 2004; 20(3):133-42.[PMID:15100588] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200405000-00002
58. Van der Zee K, Sanderman R. Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36: Een handleiding [Measuring general health with the RAND-36: A manual]. 2nd ed. Groningen (the Netherlands): Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken NCG; 2012. Dutch.
59. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.[PMID:17161752] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
60. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.[PMID:20298572] http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22
61. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-49.[PMID:20169472] http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
62. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
63. Post MW, van Leeuwen CM, van Koppenhagen CF, de Groot S. Validity of the Life Satisfaction questions, the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):1832-37.[PMID:22484088] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.025
64. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.
65. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: A practical guide. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press; 2011.
66. Brockow T, Cieza A, Kuhlow H, Sigl T, Franke T, Harder M, Stucki G. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med. 2004;(44 Suppl):30-36.[PMID:15370745]
67. Hieblinger R, Coenen M, Stucki G, Winkelmann A, Cieza A. Identification of essential elements of functioning in chronic widespread pain based on a statistical approach. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(12):979-91.[PMID:22019964] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c89c
68. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford (United Kingdom): Oxford University Press; 2003.