Feasibility of the Canadian occupational performance measure for routine use

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 48-54

  Colquhoun, Heather ^a   Letts, Lori ^a   Law, Mary ^a   MacDermid, Joy ^a   Edwards, Mary ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian occupational performance measure; Clinical utility; Outcome measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749285697     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4276/030802210X12658062793726     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J (2006) Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Manual Therapy, 11, 46-53.
2. Blenkiron EL (2005) Uptake of standardised hand assessments in rheumatology: why is it so low? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(4), 148-57.
3. Bodiam C (1999) The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(3), 123-26.
4. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1999) Toolkit on evidence-based practice. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
5. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (2004) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 210-22.
6. Chen Y, Rodger S, Polatajko H (2002) Experiences with the COPM and client-centred practice in adult neurorehabilitation in Taiwan. Occupational Therapy International, 9(3), 167-84.
7. Dettmer SS, Gresham GE (1997) Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional. Gaithersburg, ML: Aspen Publishers
8. Donnelly C, Carswell A (2002) Individualised outcome measures: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 84-94.
9. Epstein AM (1990) The outcomes movement - will it get us where we want to go? New England Journal of Medicine, 323, 266-70.
10. Fedden T, Green A, Hill T ( 1999) Out of the Woods: the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, from the manual into practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(7), 318-20.
11. Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA (2002) Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures: national survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 101-03.
12. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S (2001) The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33, 273-78.
13. Huijbregts MPJ, Myers AM, Kay TM, Gavin TS (2002) Systematic outcome measurement in clinical practice: challenges experienced by physiotherapists. Physiotherapy Canada, 54, 25-31, 36.
14. Ilott I, White E (2001) 2001 College of Occupational Therapists' research and development strategic vision and action plan. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(6), 270-77.
15. Kay TM, Myers AM, Huijbregts MPJ (2001) How far have we come since 1992? A comparative survey of physiotherapists' use of outcome measures. Physiotherapy Canada, 53, 268-75.
16. Lakeman R (2004) Standardized routine outcome measurement: pot holes in the road to recovery. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 13, 210-15.
17. Law M, Baum C (1998) Evidence-based occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3), 131-35.
18. Law M, Baum C (2005) Measurement in occupational therapy. In: M Law, C Baum, W Dunn, eds. Measuring occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 3-21.
19. Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, McColl MA, Carswell A, Baptiste S (1994) Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 191-97.
20. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N (2005) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure manual. 4th ed. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
21. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M (2000) Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 22-30.
22. McColl MA, Law M, Baptiste S, Pollock N, Carswell A, Polatajko HJ (2005) Targeted applications of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 298-300.
23. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Glover G (1999) The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 243-49.
24. Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A (1995) The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(5), 242-49.
25. Walter G, Geary M, Rey JM (1998) Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice, 18, 109-15.
26. Wressle E, Eeg Olofsson A, Marcusson J, Henriksson C (2002) Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 5-11.