Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1503-1509

  Kjeken, Ingvild ^a   Dagfinrud, Hanne ^b   Uhlig, Till ^a   Mowinckel, Petter ^a   Kvien, Tore K ^a   Finset, Arnstein ^b  

^a DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ankylosing spondylitis; Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; Occupational therapy; Outcome; Rehabilitation; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CANADA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTAL SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPONDYLITIS, ANKYLOSING; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 23444431655     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Whiteneck GG. The 44th Annual John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1073-6.
2. Cardol M, Brandsma JW, de Groot IJ, van den Bos GA, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA. Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess? Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:97-105.
3. World Health Organization. Assessment, Classification and Epidemiology Group. International Classification of Functioning and Disability. Beta-2 draft, full version. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
4. Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, et al. Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 2003;30:868-72.
5. Kvien TK, Heiberg T. The patient perspective in outcome assessments - perceptions or something more? J Rheumatol 2003;30:873-6.
6. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
7. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (manual). 3rd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications; 1998.
8. Sumsion T, editor. Client-centred practice in occupational therapy. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.
9. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. 3rd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications; 1997.
10. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 2000;67:22-30.
11. Wressle E, Lindstrand J, Neher M, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment programme. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:497-506.
12. Bailey A, Starr L, Alderson M, Moreland J. A comparative evaluation of a fibromyalgia rehabilitation program. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:336-40.
13. Carpenter L, Baker GA, Tyldesley B. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome of a pain management program. Can J Occup Ther 2001;68:16-22.
14. Khan AM. Ankylosing spondylitis. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
15. Zink A, Braun J, Listing J, Wollenhaupt J. Disability and handicap in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis - results from the German rheumatological database. German Collaborative Arthritis Centers. J Rheumatol 2000;27:613-22.
16. Boers M, Brooks P, Strand CV, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1998;25:198-9.
17. Chan CCH. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Measure. Occup Ther Int 1997;4:229-47.
18. Ripat J, Etcheverry E, Cooper J, Tate RB. A comparison of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Can J Occup Ther 2001;68:247-53.
19. Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, McColl MA, Carswell A, Baptiste S. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther 1994;61:191-7.
20. Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther 1999;6:84-9.
21. Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 1995;62:242-9.
22. Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure -Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther 2002;69:40-8.
23. Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson AM, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:5-11.
24. Kjeken I, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Uhlig T. Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with hand osteoarthritis: Validity, responsiveness, and feasibility. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:709-15.
25. Law M. Measurement in Occupational Therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Can J Occup Ther 1987;54:133-8.
26. Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, Kuyk-Minis MA. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:402-9.
27. Sewell L, Singh SJ. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: is it a reliable measure in clients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Br J Occup Ther 1993;64:305-10.
28. Pan AW, Chung L, Hsin-Hwei G. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for clients with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan. Occup Ther Int 2003;10:269-77.
29. Dagfinrud H, Mengshoel AM, Hagen KB, Loge JH, Kvien TK. Health status in ankylosing spondylitis: A comparison with the general population. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1605-10.
30. Moll JM. New criteria for the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 1987;65 Suppl:12-24.
31. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286-91.
32. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281-5.
33. Cronstedt H, Waldner A, Stenstrom CH. The Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. Reliability and validity. Scand J Rheumatol 1999;111 Suppl:I-9.
34. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy LG, Garrett SL, Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1694-8.
35. Jones SD, Porter J, Garrett SL, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Calin A. A new scoring system for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index [letter]. J Rheumatol 1995;22:1609.
36. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:49-56.
37. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Assessing data quality. Nursing research. Principles and methods. Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1999.
38. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1991.
39. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
40. Gilbertson L, Langhorne P. Home-based occupational therapy: stroke patients' satisfaction with occupational performance and service provision. Br J Occup Ther 2000;63:464-8.
41. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SAJ, Wallston KA, Hummon NP. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983;26:1346-53.
42. Bodiam C. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. Br J Occup Ther 1999;62:123-6.
43. Ward GE, Jagger C. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: what do users consider important? Br J Ther Rehab 1996;3:448-52.
44. Tryssenaar J, Jones EJ, Lee D. Occupational performance needs of a shelter population. Can J Occup Ther 1999;66:188-96.
45. Soderman P, Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:39-46.
46. Karoly P, Jensen MP. Multimethod assessment of chronic pain. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1987.