Validity, responsiveness and feasibility of an Italian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 215-222

  Spadaro, Antonio ^a   Lubrano, Ennio ^b   Massimiani, Maria Pia ^a   Gaia, Piercarlo ^c   Perrotta, Fabio Massimo ^a   Parsons, Wendy J ^b   Ferrara, Nicola ^b,d   Valesini, Guido ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b IRCCS   (Italy)

^c Sapienza University of Rome ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ankylosing spondylitis; Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; Disability; Italian version; Occupational therapy; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; ARTICLE; CANADIAN OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DISEASE DURATION; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FEMALE; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ADULT; AGED; CANADA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPONDYLITIS, ANKYLOSING;

EID: 77952784002     PISSN: 0392856X     EISSN: 1593098X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. CALIN A, GARRET S, WHITELOCK H et al.: A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis. The development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 2281-2285
2. JENKINSON TR, MALLORIE PA, WHITELOCK HC, KENNEDY LG, GARRETT SL, CALIN A: Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 1694-1698
3. GARRETT S, JENKINSON T, KENENDY LG, WHITELOCK H, GAISFORD P, CALIN A: A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 2286-2291
4. ZOCHLING J, BRAUN J: Quality indicators, guidelines and outcome measures in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25 (Suppl. 47): 147-152
5. rd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.
6. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS: Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: CAOT Publications, 1997.
7. WRESSLE E, SAMUELSSON K, HENRIKSSON C: Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scan J Occup Ther 1999; 6: 84-89
8. KJEKEN I, SLATKOWSKY-CHRISTENSEN B, KVIEN TK, UHLIG T: Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Mesasure in patients with hands osteoarthritis: validity, responsiveness and feasibility. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 709-715
9. RIPAT J, ETCHEVERRY E, COOPER J, TATE RB: A comparison of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Health Assessment Questionnaire. Can J Occup Ther 2001; 68: 247-253 (Pubitemid 32970819)
10. KJEKEN I, DAGFINRUD H, UHLIQ T, MOWINCKEL P, KVIEN TK, FINSET A: Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 1503-1509
11. BOERS M, BROOKS P, STRAND CV, TUGWELL P: The OMERACT filter for outcome measure in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 198-199
12. VAN DER LINDEN S, VALKENBURG HA, CATS A: Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for anky-losing spondylitis. A proposal form modification of the new York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 361-368
13. RANZA R, MARCHESONI A, CALORI G et al.: The Italian Version of the functional disability index of the health assessment questionnaire. A reliable instrument for multicenter studies in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1993; 11: 123-128
14. LAW M: Measurement in occupational therapy: scientific criteria for evaluation. Can J Occup Ther 1987; 54: 133-138
15. DAGFINRUD H, KJEKEN I, MOWINCKEL P, HAGEN KB, KVIEN TK: Impact of functional impairment in ankylosing spondylitis: impairment, activity limitation, and participation restrictions. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 516-523
16. CARPENTER L. BAKER GA, TYLDESLEY B: The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome of a pain management program. Can J Occup Ther 2001; 68: 16-22.
17. LAW M, POLATAJKO H, POLLIOCK N, MC COLL MA, CARSWELL A, BAPTISTE S: Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Mesasure; clinical and measurement isuues. Can J Occup Ther 1994; 61: 191-197