New findings in allergic contact dermatitis

Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 430-435

  Fyhrquist, Nanna ^a   Lehto, Erja ^b   Lauerma, Antti ^b  

^a FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

contact allergy; epidemiology; molecular mechanisms

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN; CYTOKINE; FRAGRANCE; INFLAMMASOME; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR; ALLERGEN; FOOD PRESERVATIVE; NICKEL;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; CYTOKINE RELEASE; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INNATE IMMUNITY; NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY; NONHUMAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN PENETRATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; STRATUM CORNEUM; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; IMMUNOLOGY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METABOLISM;

ALLERGENS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FOOD PRESERVATIVES; HUMANS; INFLAMMASOMES; NICKEL; TOLL-LIKE RECEPTORS;

EID: 84906939825     PISSN: 15284050     EISSN: 14736322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000092     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Nguyen SH, Dang TP, MacPherson C, et al. Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multicentre population in North America (NACDG). Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58:101-106.
2. Diepgen TL. Occupational skin-disease data in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2003; 76:331-338.
3. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, et al. Occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria between 1990 and 1999: a population-based study. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145:453-462.
4. Saint-Mezard P, Berard F, Dubois B, et al. The role of CD4+and CD8+T cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14:131-138.
5. Fyhrquist N, Wolff H, Lauerma A, Alenius H. CD8+ T cell migration to the skin requires CD4+ help in a murine model of contact hypersensitivity. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41038.
6. Cavani A, Albanesi C, Traidl C, et al. Effector and regulatory T cells in allergic contact dermatitis. Trends Immunol 2001; 22:118-120.
7. Liu J, Harberts E, Tammaro A, et al. IL-9 regulates allergen-specific Th1 responses in allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2014; 134:1903-1911.
8. Vocanson M, Hennino A, Rozieres A, et al. Effector and regulatory mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy 2009; 64:1699-1714.
9. Bour H, Peyron E, Gaucherand M, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted CD8+ T cells and class II-restricted CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediate and regulate contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene. Eur J Immunol 1995; 25:3006-3010.
10. Cavani A, Nasorri F, Ottaviani C, et al. Human CD25+ regulatory T cells maintain immune tolerance to nickel in healthy, nonallergic individuals. J Immunol 2003; 171:5760-5768.
11. Lehtimaki S, Savinko T, Lahl K, et al. The temporal and spatial dynamics of Foxp3+ Treg cell-mediated suppression during contact hypersensitivity responses in a murine model. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 132:2744-2751.
12. Tomura M, Honda T, Tanizaki H, et al. Activated regulatory T cells are the major T cell type emigrating from the skin during a cutaneous immune response in mice. J Clin Invest 2010; 120:883-893.
13. Honda T, Egawa G, Grabbe S, Kabashima K. Update of immune events in the murine contact hypersensitivity model: toward the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133:303-315.
14. Roberts DW, Aptula AO. Determinants of skin sensitisation potential. J Appl Toxicol 2008; 28:377-387.
15. Novak N, Baurecht H, Schafer T, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene and allergic contact sensitization to nickel. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128:1430-1435.
16. Corsini E, Galli CL. Epidermal cytokines in experimental contact dermatitis. Toxicology 2000; 142:203-211.
17. Kaplan DH, Igyarto BZ, Gaspari AA. Early immune events in the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12:114-124.
18. Martin SF, Esser PR, Weber FC, et al. Mechanisms of chemical-induced innate immunity in allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy 2011; 66:1152-1163.
19. Kagatani S, Sasaki Y, Hirota M, et al. Oxidation of cell surface thiol groups by contact sensitizers triggers the maturation of dendritic cells. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130:175-183.
20. Natsch A. The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers-functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers. Toxicol Sci 2010; 113:284-292.
21. Schmidt M, Raghavan B, Muller V, et al. Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel. Nat Immunol 2010; 11:814-819.
22. Trompette A, Divanovic S, Visintin A, et al. Allergenicity resulting from functional mimicry of a Toll-like receptor complex protein. Nature 2009; 457:585-588.
23. Martin SF, Dudda JC, Bachtanian E, et al. Toll-like receptor and IL-12 signaling control susceptibility to contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 2008; 205:2151-2162.
24. Scheibner KA, Lutz MA, Boodoo S, et al. Hyaluronan fragments act as an endogenous danger signal by engaging TLR2. J Immunol 2006; 177:1272-1281.
25. Termeer C, Benedix F, Sleeman J, et al. Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan activate dendritic cells via toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med 2002; 195:99-111.
26. Stern R, Kogan G, Jedrzejas MJ, Soltes L. The many ways to cleave hyaluronan. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25:537-557.
27. Shornick LP, de Togni P, Mariathasan S, et al. Mice deficient in IL-1beta manifest impaired contact hypersensitivity to trinitrochlorobenzone. J Exp Med 1996; 183:1427-1436.
28. Watanabe H, Gaide O, Petrilli V, et al. Activation of the IL-1beta-processing inflammasome is involved in contact hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127:1956-1963.
29. Weber FC, Esser PR, Muller T, et al. Lack of the purinergic receptor P2X(7) results in resistance to contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 2010; 207:2609-2619.
30. Watanabe H, Gehrke S, Contassot E, et al. Danger signaling through the inflammasome acts as a master switch between tolerance and sensitization. J Immunol 2008; 180:5826-5832.
31. Geier J, Krautheim A, Uter W, et al. Occupational contact allergy in the building trade in Germany: influence of preventive measures and changing exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2011; 84:403-411.
32. Anveden Berglind I, Lind ML, Liden C. Epoxy pipe relining - an emerging contact allergy risk for workers. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:59-65.
33. Fillenham G, Liden C, Anveden Berglind I. Skin exposure to epoxy in the pipe relining trade - an observational study. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:66-72.
34. Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M, Kuuliala O, et al. Contact allergy to aliphatic polyisocyanates based on hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate (HDI). Contact Dermatitis 2010; 63:357-363.
35. Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M, Henriks-Eckerman ML. Occupational contact allergy to the epoxy methacrylate 2,2-bis[4-(2-methacryloxyethoxy)phenyl] propane in an anaerobic glue. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 68:314-315.
36. Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M, Kuuliala O, Suuronen K. Contact allergy from metalworking fluid traced to tall oil fatty acids monoethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 69:316-317.
37. Suuronen K, Pesonen M, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Aalto-Korte K. Triphenyl phosphite, a new allergen in polyvinylchloride gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 68:42-49.
38. De Quintana Sancho A, Raton JA, Eizaguirre X. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by N,N-didecyl-N-methyl-poly(oxyethyl) ammonium propionate in a dental assistant. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:379-380.
39. Kubin ME, Riekki R. Allergic contact eczema caused by exotic wood material in sauna interior decoration. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:255-256.
40. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Zachariae C, Menne T. The outcome of dimethylglyoxime testing in a sample of cell phones in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 59:38-42.
41. Lutzner J, Hartmann A, Dinnebier G, et al. Metal hypersensitivity and metal ion levels in patients with coated or uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 2010; 37:1925-1931.
42. Mann J, McFadden JP, White JM, et al. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:276-281.
43. Turan H, Okur M, Kaya E, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis to para-phenylenediamine in a tattoo: a case report. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2013; 32:185-187.
44. Haluk Akar H, Adatepe S, Tahan F, Solmaz I. Hair dyes and temporary tattoos are a real hazard for adolescents? Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 46:35-37.
45. Van Lerberghe L, Baeck M. A case of acute contact dermatitis induced by formaldehyde in hair-straightening products. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:384-386.
46. Bhargava K, White JM, White IR. Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis caused by ethyl cyanoacrylate-containing eyelash adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:306-307.
47. Pesonen M, Kuuliala O, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Aalto-Korte K. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by eyelash extension glues. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67:307-308.
48. Sasseville D, Stanciu M. Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylhexylglycerin in sunscreens. Dermatitis 2014; 25:42-43.
49. Yagami A, Suzuki K, Morita Y, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 3-oethyl-L-ascorbic acid (vitamin Cethyl). Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:376-377.
50. Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M, Kuuliala O, Suuronen K. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut fatty acids diethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:169-174.
51. Leysen J, Goossens A, Lambert J, Aerts O. Polyhexamethylene biguanide is a relevant sensitizer in wetwipes. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:323-325.
52. Vigan M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by sodium chondroitin sulfate contained in a cosmetic cream. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:383-384.