Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: A comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure;Digitale dentale Volumentomographie und low-dose Mehrschicht- Computertomographie in der Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, insbesondere in der Kieferorthopädie: Vergleichende Evaluierung von Bildqualität und Strahlenexposition

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 384-398

  Hofmann, E ^a   Schmid, M ^b   Lell, M ^a   Hirschfelder, U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental radiography; Diagnostic imaging; Image quality; Organ dose; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BODY BURDEN; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

BODY BURDEN; CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84906806298     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-014-0232-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M (2004) Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:285-290
2. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V et al (2010) Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Radiol med 115:600-611
3. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Möbes O et al (2002) Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 12:634-637
4. Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U et al (2008) Schnittbildverfahren zur dentomaxillofacialen Diagnostik: Dosisvergleich von Dental-MSCT und New Tom 9000 DVT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 180:396-401
5. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y (2010) Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:16.e1-16.e6 (discussion 16-17
6. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P et al (2007) Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:198-203
7. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Kameoka S et al (2007) Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:465-471
8. Hofmann E, Medelnik J, Fink M et al (2013) Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison - an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 35289-294
9. Hofmann E, Schmid M, Sedlmair M et al (2013) Comparative study of image quality and dosimetry of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0948-9 (epub ahead of print
10. Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I (2005) Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 66:434-444
11. Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
12. ICRP Publication 103 (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP
13. Janson H, Olsson U (2001) A measure of agreement for interval or nominal multivariate observations. EPM 61:277-289
14. Kalender WA (2005) Computed tomography. Fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. 2nd edn. Publicis, Erlangen
15. Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Lagner O et al (2010) Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality. Fortschr Röntgenstr 183:144-153
16. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174
17. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B et al (2010) A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part I: on subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 75:265-269
18. Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y et al (2010) A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: on 3D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol 75:270-274
19. Loubele M, Maes F, Jacobs R et al (2008) Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:222-226
20. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E et al (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71:461-468
21. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G, i-Cat. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:219-226
22. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examination: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculations. J Am Dent Assoc 139(9):1237-1243
23. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:930-938
24. Marmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J (2005) Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:28-31
25. Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y et al (2009) Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:79-85
26. Periago D, Scarfe W, Moshiri M et al (2008) Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 78:387-395
27. Rustemeyer P, Streubühr U, Suttmoeller J (2004) Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality. Acta Radiol 45:847-853
28. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G (2004) Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:83-86
29. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Fisher ES (1981) The tissue-equivalence of the Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom for x-rays of diagnostic qualities. Phys Med Biol 26:133-139
30. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420-428
31. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F et al (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthodont Orofacial Orthoped 133:640.e1-5
32. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y et al (2009) Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:367-378
33. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S et al (2005) Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 56:413-417