Biomass combustion with in situ CO2 capture by CaO in a 300kWth circulating fluidized bed facility

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 142-152

  Alonso, M ^a   Diego, M E ^a   Perez C ^b   Chamberlain, J R ^b   Abanades, J C ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DEL CARBÓN   (Spain)

^b Gas Natural Fenosa   (Spain)

Author keywords

BECCS; Biomass combustion; Calcium looping; Negative emissions

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; BIOMASS; CALCINATION; CALCITE; CALCIUM; CALCIUM CARBONATE; CALCIUM OXIDE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHEMICAL REACTORS; EFFICIENCY; FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTORS; FLUIDIZED BED PROCESS; FLUIDIZED BEDS; IN SITU COMBUSTION; PILOT PLANTS;

BECCS; BIOMASS COMBUSTION; CALCIUM LOOPING; CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED; CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR; COMBUSTION EFFICIENCIES; SOLID CIRCULATING RATE; SUPERFICIAL GAS VELOCITIES; CO2 CAPTURE;

FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMBUSTION; LIME; UNDERGROUND STORAGE;

EID: 84906685082     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 3. Chem. Eng. J. 2002, 90:303-306.
2. 2 capture in combustion systems. Fluidized bed technologies for near-zero emission combustion and gasification 2013, 931-971. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. F. Scala (Ed.).
3. 2 capture with CaO, I. Process description and economics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:6972-6981.
4. 2 capture with CaO during the low temperature combustion of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5:512-520.
5. 2 with lime. Energy Fuels 2003, 17:308-315.
6. 2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO. AIChE J. 2004, 50:1614-1622.
7. 2 capture by CaO. II. Experimental results. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:6982-6989.
8. Alonso M., Rodriguez N., Gonzalez B., Grasa G., Murillo R., Abanades J.C. Carbon dioxide capture from combustion flue gases with a calcium oxide chemical loop. Experimental results and process development. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2010, 4:167-173.
9. 2 from a combustion flue gas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64:883-891.
10. Anthony E.J. Ca looping technology: current status, developments and future directions. Greenh. Gas Sci. Technol. 2011, 1:36-47.
11. th calcium looping pilot. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2013, 18:237-245.
12. 2. J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 1973, 23:733-742.
13. 2 capture. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36:260-279.
14. Boot-Handford M.E., Abanades J.C., Anthony E.J., Blunt M.J., Brandani S., Mac Dowell N., Fernández J.R., Ferrari M.C., Gross R., Hallett J.P., Haszeldine R.S., Heptonstall P., Lyngfelt A., Makuch Z., Mangano E., Porter R.T.J., Pourkashanian M., Rochelle G.T., Shah N., Yao J.G., Fennell P.S. Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7:130-189.
15. th facilities. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2013, 36:1525-1532.
16. Charitos A., Hawthorne C., Bidwe A.R., Sivalingam S., Schuster A., Spliethoff H., Scheffknecht G. Parametric investigation of the calcium looping process for CO2 capture in a 10kW(th) dual fluidized bed. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2010, 4:776-784.
17. 2 capture process with two circulating fluidized bed carbonator reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:9685-9695.
18. 2 Capture Technology from Lab to Pilot Scale at IFK 2014, University of Stuttgart. Fuel.
19. th carbonate and chemical looping CCS test rig. VGB PowerTech 2011, 91:64-68.
20. th dual fluidized bed pilot plant. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 2010, Energy Procedia, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
21. IPCC Mitigation of climate change. Working group III. Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report. Summary for Policymakers 2014, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/, O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, S. Kadner, J. Minx, S. Brunner (Eds.).
22. Ishitani H., Johansson T.B. Energy supply mitigation options. Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. R.T. Watson, M.C. Zinoyowera, R.H. Moss (Eds.).
23. Koornneef J., van Breevoort P., Hamelinck C., Hendriks C., Hoogwijk M., Koop K., Koper M., Dixon T., Camps A. Global potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage up to 2050. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2012, 11:117-132.
24. Leckner B., Karlsson M. Gaseous emissions from circulating fluidized-bed combustion of wood. Biomass Bioenergy 1993, 4:379-389.
25. Obersteiner M., Azar C., Kauppi P., Mollersten K., Moreira J., Nilsson S., Read P., Riahi K., Schlamadinger B., Yamagata Y., Yan J., van Ypersele J.P. Managing climate risk. Science 2001, 294:786-787.
26. 2 capture process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 10.1021/ie500606v.
27. th test facility consisting of two interconnected CFBs. 21st Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion 2012.
28. Rhodes J.S., Keith D.W. Biomass with capture: negative emissions within social and environmental constraints: an editorial comment. Clim. Change 2008, 87:321-328.
29. 2 with CaO. AIChE J. 2011, 57:1356-1366.
30. 2 with CaO. Energy Proc. 2011, 4:393-401.
31. Saidur R., Abdelaziz E.A., Demirbas A., Hossain M.S., Mekhilef S. A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15:2262-2289.
32. 2 capture with CaO. 21st International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion 2012, 365-372.
33. 2 from combustion processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1999, 77:62-68.
34. th pilot plant and model validation. Fuel 2014, 127:13-22.
35. Werther J., Saenger M., Hartge E.U., Ogada T., Siagi Z. Combustion of agricultural residues. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2000, 26:1-27.