Biomass combustion with in situ CO2 capture with CaO. I. process description and economics

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 6972-6981

  Abanades, Juan C ^a   Alonso, Mónica ^a   Rodríguez, Nuria ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DEL CARBÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-CARBON; BIOMASS COMBUSTION; CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED; COST ESTIMATIONS; COST VARIABLES; GEOLOGICAL STORAGE; GREEN CERTIFICATES; IN-SITU; LOW TEMPERATURES; LOW-CARBON; NOVEL CONCEPT; OXY-FUELS; ZERO EMISSION;

BIOMASS; CALCINATION; CALCIUM CARBONATE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FLUIDIZATION; FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION; FLUIDIZED BED PROCESS; FLUIDIZED BEDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL STORAGE; POWER PLANTS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

IN SITU COMBUSTION;

EID: 79960005829     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie102353s     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Faaij, A.; Meuleman, B.; Turkenburg, W.; van Wijk, A.; Bauen, A.; Rosillo-Calle, F.; Hall, D. Externalities of biomass based electricity production compared with power generation from coal in the Netherlands. Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 14, 125.
2. World Energy Outlook 2009 (WEO 2009); International Energy Agency: Paris, 2009.
3. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change; Metz, B., Davidson, O., Bosch, P., Dave, R., Meyer, L., Eds.; Contribution ofWorking Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. and New York, U.S., 2007.
4. Ishitani, H.; Johansson, T. B. Energy supply mitigation options. In Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses; Watson, R. T., Zinoyowera, M. C., Moss, R. H., Eds.; Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. and New York, U.S., 1996; Chapter 19.
5. Rhodes, J. S.; Keith, D. W. Biomass with capture: Negative emissions within social and environmental constraints: An editorial comment. Clim. Change 2008, 87, 321.
6. Obersteiner, M.; Azar, C.; Kauppi, P.; Mollersten, K.; Moreira, J.; Nilsson, S.; Read, P.; Riahi, K.; Schlamadinger, B.; Yamagata, Y.; Yan, J.; van Ypersele, J. P. Managing climate risk. Science 2001, 294, 786.
7. Rhodes, J. S.; Keith, D. W. Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 29, 440.
8. Dai, J.; Sokhansanj, S.; Grace, J. R; Bi, X.; Lim, C. J; Melin, S. Overview and some issues related to co-firing biomass and coal. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 86, 367.
9. Demirbas, M. F.; Balat, M.; Balat, H. Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development. Energy Convers. Manage. 2009, 50, 1746.
10. Maciejewska, A.; Veringa, H.; Sanders, J.; Peteves, S. D. Co-firing of Biomass with Coal: Constraints and Role of Biomass Pre- Treatment; Report EUR 22461 EN; Institute for Energy, Directorate- General Joint Research Centre: Petten, The Netherlands, 2006; available at http://ie.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ publications/scientific-publications/2006/eur22461EN.pdf (Accessed April 25, 2011).
11. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., Meyer, L., Eds.; Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. and New York, U.S., 2005.
12. Toftegaard, M. B.; Brix, J.; Jensen, P. A.; Glarborg, P.; Jensen, A. D. Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 581.
13. 2 absorption in a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier to produce a hydrogen rich syngas. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2007, 5.
14. 2. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 5073.
15. Cormos, C. C.; Cormos, A. M.; Agachi, S. Power generation from coal and biomass based on integrated gasification combined cycle concept with pre- and post-combustion carbon capture methods. Asia- Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 4, 870.
16. Acharya, B.; Dutta, A.; Basu, P. Chemical-Looping Gasification of Biomass for Hydrogen-Enriched Gas Production with In-Process Carbon Dioxide Capture. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 5077.
17. 2 absorption in a dual fluidized bed system of 8 MW fuel input. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 914.
18. Florin, N. H.; Harris, A. T. Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass with in situ carbon dioxide capture using calcium oxide sorbents. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 287.
19. 2 acceptor gasification process. Studies of acceptor properties. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1967, 69, 141.
20. Harrison, D. P. Sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 6486.
21. 2 capture. Fuel 2008, 87, 1678.
22. Lin, S. Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Hatano, H.; Harada, M. Developing an innovative method, HyPr-RING, to produce hydrogen from hydrocarbons. Energy Convers. Manage. 2002, 43, 1283.
23. 2 from Combustion Processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1999, 77, 62.
24. Gupta, H.; Fan, L. S. Carbonation-Calcination Cycle Using High Reactivity Calcium Oxide for Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 4035.
25. 3. Chem. Eng. J. 2002, 90, 303.
26. 2 capture. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 260.
27. Alonso, M.; Rodriguez, N.; Gonzalez, B.; Grasa, G.; Murillo, R.; Abanades, J. C. Carbon dioxide capture from combustion flue gases with a calcium oxide chemical loop. Experimental results and process development. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4, 167.
28. 2 capture in pilot-scale dual fluidized beds. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 1386.
29. 2 capture efficiency of the carbonate looping process in a 10 kW dual fluidized bed. Presented at the 20th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Xian, China, May 18-21, 2009.
30. 2 Emissions in Coal Firing with Oxy-Fuel Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32, 355.
31. Buhre, B. J. P.; Elliott, L. K.; Sheng, C. D.; Gupta, R. P.; Wall, T. F. Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2005, 31, 283.
32. 2 capture with CaO. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 2861.
33. Wang, J. S.; Anthony, E. J.; Abanades, J. C. Clean and efficient use of petroleum coke for combustion and power generation. Fuel 2004, 83, 1341.
34. 2 capture with CaO during the low temperature combustion of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, published online Feb 19, 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc 2010.01.006.
35. Anthony, E. J. Solid Looping Cycles: A New Technology for Coal Conversion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1747.
36. Baker, E. H. The calcium oxide-calcium dioxide system in the pressure range 1-300 atm. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 464.
37. 2 capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 8846.
38. Rodríguez, N.; Alonso, M.; Abanades, J. C. Average activity of CaO particles in a calcium looping system. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 388.
39. 2 Capture by CaO. II. Experimental Results. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011; DOI: 10.1021/ie102355e.
40. 2 capture system using CaO. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 138, 148.
41. 2 capture in existing power plants. Energy Convers. Manage. 2008, 49, 2809.
42. 2 capture from flue gas using carbonation/calcination cycles. AIChE J. 2008, 54, 1912.
43. 2 capture in a 10 kW(th) dual fluidized bed. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4, 776.
44. 2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1630.
45. 2 Capture; IEAGHG Biomass CCS Study, 2009/9, IEAGHG: Cheltenham, U.K., November 2009.
46. 2 capture system using CaO. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5523.
47. 3 used in cement manufacture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6980.
48. SETIS Calculator. Calculation of Energy Production Costs. Institute for Energy, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre: Petten, The Netherlands. https://odin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/SETIS/SETIS1.html#.