When bad becomes good (and vice versa): Why social exclusion is not based on difference

Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 161-189

  Abrams, Dominic ^a   De Moura, Georgina Randsley ^a   Hutchison, Paul ^b   Viki, G Tendayi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906425048     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203496176     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Aboud, F. E. (1988). Children and prejudice. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
2. Abrams, D. (1985). Focus of attention in minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 65-74.
3. Abrams, D. (1990). How do group members regulate their behavior? An integration of social identity and self-awareness theories. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 89-112). London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf and Springer-Verlag.
4. Abrams, D. (1992). Processes of self-identification. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 57-99). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Abrams, D. (1994). Social self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 473-483.
6. Abrams, D. (1996). Social identity, self as structure and self as process. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 143-167). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
7. Abrams, D. (1999). Social identity, social cognition, and the self: The flexibility and stability of self-categorization. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 197-230). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8. Abrams, D. & Brown, R. J. (1989). Self-consciousness and social identity: Selfregulation as a group member. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 311-318.
9. Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
10. Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (1990). An introduction to the social identity approach. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 1-9). London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf and Springer-Verlag.
11. Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Collective Identity: Group Membership and Self-Conception. In M. A. Hogg and S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 425-461).
12. Abrams, D. & Masser, B. (1998). Context and the social self-regulation of stereotyping:Perception, judgment and behaviour. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 53-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L., (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children's judgments of normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840-1856.
14. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 163-182.
15. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
16. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Randsley de Moura, G., Hutchison, P., & Bown, N. J. (2004). The maintenance of entitativity: A subjective group dynamics approach. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 361-381). Philadelphia PA: Psychology Press.
17. Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Marques, J. M. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: When ingroup bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 155-176.
18. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
19. Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.
20. Berkowitz, L. & Howard, R. (1959). Reaction to opinion deviates as affected by affiliation need and group member interdependence. Sociometry, 22, 81-91.
21. Biernat, M., T., Vescio, T. K., Billings, L. S. (1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation:Integrating two models of social judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 523-542.
22. Blascovich, J., Wyer, N. A., Swart, L. A., & Kibler, J. L. (1997). Racism and racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1364-1372.
23. Bodenhausen, G. & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 1-52). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
24. Boyanowsky, E. & Allen, V. (1973). Ingroup norms and self-identity as determinants of discriminatory behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 408-418.
25. Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). Ingroup or outgroup extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
26. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
27. Cadinu, M. R. & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-677.
28. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
29. Caporael, L. R. & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Metatheories, evolution, and psychology: Once more with feeling. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 23-26.
30. Castano, E., Paladino, M-P., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2002a). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 365-385.
31. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Bourguignon, D., & Seron, E. (2002b). Who may enter? The impact of ingroup identification on ingroup/outgroup categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315-322.
32. Christian, J. N., Hutchison, P., & Abrams, D. (2003). Deviance and Sanctioning in Low and High Status Groups. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Social Section Conference, London School of Economics, September 10-12.
33. Coull, A., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Paladino, M-P., & Leemans, V. (2001). Protecting the ingroup: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening ingroup members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 327-339.
34. Davis, J. & Witte, E. (1996). Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 2) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
36. Fielding, K. S. & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorisation, and leadership:A field study of small interactive groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 39-51.
37. Fiske, S. T. & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
39. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership:Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100.
40. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
41. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 509-530.
42. Haslam, S. A. & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership:How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
43. Haslam, S. A., Platow, M. J., Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., McGarty, C., Oakes, P. J., et al. (2001). Social identity and the romance of leadership. The importance of being seen to be "doing it for us". Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 191-205.
44. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M. & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
45. Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
46. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-256.
47. Hogg, M. A. (2001a). Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In R. S. Tindale and M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, (Vol 3): Group processes. (pp 56-85). Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Hogg, M. A. (2001b). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
49. Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
50. Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
51. Hogg, M. A. & Hains, C. S. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in group think. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 323-341.
52. Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C. & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
53. Hogg, M. A. & McGarty, C. (1990). Self-categorization and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 10-27). London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf and Springer-Verlag.
54. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
55. Holtz, R. & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 890-898.
56. Hutchison, P. (2003). Motivational processes in stereotype change: Examining factors that moderate the impact of "deviant" group members on stereotypes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kent.
57. Hutchison, P. & Abrams, D. (2003). Ingroup identification moderates stereotype change in reaction to ingroup deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33.
58. Hutchison, P, & Abrams, D., & Viki, G. T. (2002). Social Identification, Social Attraction, and Reactions to Deviant In-Group Members. Paper presented at the Society of Australasian Social Psychologists 8th Annual Meeting, Adelaide, Australia, 25-28 April.
59. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
60. Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
61. Krueger, J. & Clement, R. W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 125, 52-68.
62. Kruglanski, A.W. & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
63. Kunda, Z. & Oleson, K. C. (1997). When exceptions prove the rule: How extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 965-979.
64. Kurzban, R. & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187-208.
65. Levine, J. M. (1989). Reactions to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Leyens, J-P., Rodriguez Perez, A., Rodriguez Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 395-411.
67. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3): Group Processes. Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Marques, J. M. Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and ingroup norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 976-988.
69. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right:Subjective group dynamics and derogation of ingroup deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
70. Marques, J. M. & Páez, D. (1994). The "black sheep effect": Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 38-68), Chichester, England: Wiley & Sons.
71. Marques, J. M. Páez, D., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identity and intragroup differentiation as subjective social control. In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Páez, & J. -C.Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 124-142). London, England: Sage.
72. Marques, J. M. Robalo, E. M., & Rocha, S. A. (1992). Ingroup bias and the black sheep effect: Assessing the impact of cognitive-motivational and informational antecedents of judgmental extremity towards ingroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331-352.
73. Marques, J. M. & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
74. Marques, J. M. & Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. -Ph. (1988). Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
75. McGarty, C. (1999) Categorization in social psychology. London: Sage.
76. Miller, D. T. & Prentice, D. A. (1996). The construction of social norms and standards. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 789-829). New York: The Guilford Press.
77. Miller, N., Gross, S., & Holtz, R. (1991). Social projection and attitudinal certainty. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 177-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Monteith, M. J., Sherman, J. W., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Suppression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63-82.
79. Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & van Avermaet, E. (Eds). (1985) Perspectives on minority influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297-323.
81. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
82. Mummendey, A. & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
83. Oakes, P. J. (1996). The categorization process: Cognition and the group in the social psychology of stereotyping. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities:Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 95-120). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
84. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotypes and social reality. Oxford:Blackwell.
85. Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A., (1991). Perceiving people as group members:The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
86. Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125-137
87. Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1224-1234.
88. Plant, E. A. & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832.
89. Platow, M. J. & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508-1519.
90. Randsley de Moura, G. & Abrams, D. (2001a). Subjective Group Dynamics: Testing the Role of Intra- and Intergroup Context. Paper presented at British Psychological Society Centenary Annual Conference, March 28-31, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
91. Randsley de Moura, G. & Abrams, D. (2001b, July 18-20). Subjective Group Dynamics:Examining the Role of the Intragroup Context. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Conference, Surrey, United Kingdom.
92. Randsley de Moura, G. & Abrams, D. (2002a, June 26-29). Does leadership role alone enhance trust in a non-prototypical group member? Poster presented at the 13th General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, San Sebastián, Spain.
93. Randsley de Moura, G. & Abrams, D. (2002b, September 11-13). Subjective Group Dynamics: Investigating the Role of the Intragroup Context. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Conference, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
94. Randsley de Moura, G. & Abrams, D. (2003). Does Leadership Role Change Perceptions of Deviant Group Members? Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, March 13-15.
95. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
96. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
97. Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
98. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.
99. Sherif, M. & Sherif, C.W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: an integration of studies of intergroup relations. Oxford, England: Harper & Brothers.
100. Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80-110). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
101. Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and the collective self: Selfcategorization in context. In C. Sedikides and M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 171-198). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
102. Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.). (1997). The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Blackwell.
103. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
104. Tajfel H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brookes/Cole.
105. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton, Keynes: Open University Press.
106. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
107. Turner, J. C. & Oakes, P. J. (1997). The socially structured mind. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 355-373). Oxford:Blackwell.
108. Turner, J. C., Wetherell, M. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1989). Referent informational influence and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 135-147
109. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (Eds.) (2004). The psychology of group perception:Contributions to the study of homgeneity, entitativity and essentialism. Philadelphia PA: Psychology Press.
110. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J-P., & Paladino, M-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 257-296). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
111. Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leyens, J-P., & Paladino, M-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257-295.