From "cracking the orthographic code" to "playing with language": Toward a usage-based foundation of the reading process

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue AUG, 2014, Pages

  Wallot, Sebastian ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Language games; Language use; Meaning; Natural reading; Reading research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906350643     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00891     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aczel, P. (1988). Non-Well-Founded Sets. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
2. Bandt, C., and Pompe, B. (2002). Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 174102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.174102
3. Bußmann, H. (1996). Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
4. Calkins, M. W. (1896). Association. An essay analytic and experimental. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 1, i-56. doi: 10.1037/h0092984
5. Cattell, J. M. (1886a). Psychometrische Untersuchungen. Philos. Stud. 3, 452-492.
6. Cattell, J. M. (1886b). Uber die Träigheit der Netzhaut und des Sehzentrums. Philos. Stud. 3, 94-127.
7. Clark, H. H. (1996).Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
8. Clifton, C. Jr., and Duffy, S. (2001). Sentence and text comprehension: roles of linguistic structure. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 167-196. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.167
9. Coltheart, M. (1978).Lexical Access in Simple Reading Tasks. London: Academic Press.
10. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., and Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 108, 204-256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
11. Davidson, D. (1993). "Locating literary language," in Literary Theory After Davidson, ed. R. W. Dasenbrock (University Park, PA: Penn State Press), 295-308.
12. Doctor, E. A., and Coltheart, M. (1980). Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Mem. Cogn. 8, 195-209. doi: 10.3758/BF03197607
13. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., and Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychol. Rev. 112, 777-813. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
14. Erdmann, B., and Dodge, R. (1898). Psychologische Untersuchungen über das Lesen auf Experimenteller Grundlage. New York: Niemeyer.
15. Forster, K. I., and Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 627-635. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8
16. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behav. Brain Sci. 35, 263-279. doi: 10.1017/S0140525x11001841
17. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. J. Pragmat. 34, 457-486. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00046-7
18. Gibson, E. J., and Levin, H. (1975). The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychol. Rev. 103, 518-565. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
20. Grimbly, S. (2013). Encyclopedia of the Ancient World. London: Routledge.
21. Huey, E. B. (1908).The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. London: MacMillan.
22. Hunt, R. A., and Vipond, D. (1991). First, catch the rabbit: the methodological imperative and the dramatization of dialogic reading. Poetics 20, 577-595. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(91)90026-L
23. Jared, D., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 120, 358-394. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.358
24. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., and Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 111, 228-238. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
25. Keller, T. A., Carpenter, P. A., and Just, M. A. (2001). The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cereb. Cortex 11, 223-237. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.3.223
26. Kelso, J. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self Organization of Brain and Behaviour. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
27. Kintsch, W., and Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 257-274. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4
28. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., and Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process. 25, 259-284. doi: 10.1080/01638539809545028
29. Lukatela, G., and Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123, 107-128. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.107
30. Lund, K., and Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 28, 203-208. doi: 10.3758/BF03204766
31. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., and Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: changing routes or changing deadlines? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 23, 570-590. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.570
32. McNerney, M. W., Goodwin, K. A., and Radvansky, G. A. (2011). A novel study: a situation model analysis of reading times. Discourse Process. 48, 453-474. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.582348
33. Miall, D. S., and Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics 22, 389-407. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
34. Neely, J. H., Verwys, C. A., and Kahan, T. A. (1998). Reading "glasses" will prime "vision," but reading a pair of "glasses" will not. Mem. Cogn. 26, 34-39. doi: 10.3758/BF03211368
35. Nissen, H. J. (1993). Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. O'Brien, B. A., Wallot, S., Haussmann, A., and Kloos, H. (2014). Using complexity metrics to assess silent reading fluency: a cross-sectional study comparing oral and silent reading. Sci. Stud. Read. 18, 235-254. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.862248
37. Pickering, M. J., and Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 169-190. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
38. Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., and Branigan, H. P. (2013). Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39, 890-897. doi: 10.1037/a0029181
39. Pignone, M. P., and DeWalt, D. A. (2006). Literacy and health outcomes: is adherence the missing link? J. Gen. Intern. Med. 21, 896-897. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00545.x
40. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., and Rayner, K. (2003). "Modeling eye movements in reading: extensions of the E-Z Reader model," in The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Oculomotor Research, eds J. Hyönä, R. Radach, and H. Deubel (Amsterdam: North Holland), 361-390.
41. Popper, K. (2005). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
42. Quantz, J. O. (1897). Problems in the psychology of reading. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 2, i-51. doi: 10.1037/h0092985
43. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 124, 372-422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
44. Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., and Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Sci. Stud. Read. 10, 241-255. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_3
45. Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. (1994). The Psychology of Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Rayner, K., and Reichle, E. D. (2010). Models of the reading process. Cogn. Sci. 1, 787-799. doi: 10.1002/wcs.68
47. Rindermann, H., and Ceci, S. J. (2009). Educational policy and country outcomes in international cognitive competence studies. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 551-568. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01165.x
48. Sampson, G. (1985). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49. Scheerer, E. (1981). Early German approaches to experimental reading research: the contributions of Wilhelm Wundt and Ernst Meumann. Psychol. Res. 43, 111-130. doi: 10.1007/BF00309825
50. Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2004). "Finding meaning in psychology," in Experimental Cognitive Psychology and its Applications: Festschrift in Honor of Lyle E. Bourne Jr., Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer, ed. A. F. Healy (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association).
51. Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., and Miall, D. S. (2011). Expressive reading: a phenomenological study of readers' experience of Coleridge's The rime of the ancient mariner. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 5, 258-268. doi: 10.1037/a0021999
52. Sugihara, G., May, R., Ye, H., Hsieh, C.-H., Deyle, E., Fogarty, M.,et al. (2012). Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science 338, 496-500. doi: 10.1126/science.1227079
53. Turvey, M., and Carello, C. (1981). Cognition: the view from ecological realism. Cognition 10, 313-321. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90063-9
54. Turvey, M., and Carello, C. (1985). The equation of information and meaning from the perspectives of situation semantics and Gibson's ecological realism. Linguist. Philos. 8, 81-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00653377
55. Unsworth, S. J., and Pexman, P. M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 56, 63-81. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000206
56. Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., and Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 331-350. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331
57. Van Orden, G. C., and Kloos, H. (2005). "The question of phonology and reading," in The Science of Reading: A Handbook, eds M. J. Snowling and C. Hulme (Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell), 61-78. doi: 10.1002/9780470757642.ch4
58. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., and Stone, G. O. (2001). What do double dissociations prove? Cogn. Sci. 25, 111-172. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2501_5
59. Velan, H., Deutsch, A., and Frost, R. (2013). The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye movements in reading hebrew. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 39, 1143-1152. doi: 10.1037/a0031075
60. Velan, H., and Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 913-918. doi: 10.3758/BF03194121
61. Wallot, S., Hollis, G., and van Rooij, M. (2013). Connected text reading and differences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS ONE 8:e71914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071914
62. Wallot, S., and Kelty-Stephen, D. (2014). Constraints are the solution, not the problem: commentary on Reichle and Reinglod (2013): neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:324. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00324
63. Wallot, S., O'Brien, B. A., Van Orden, G., Westbury, C., Jarema, G., and Libben, G. (2012). Fractal and Recurrence Analysis of Psycholinguistic Data. Methodological and Analytic Frontiers in Lexical Research. John Amsterdam: Benjamins, 395-430. doi: 10.1075/bct.47.18wal
64. Wallot, S., and Van Orden, G. (2011). Grounding language performance in the anticipatory dynamics of the body. Ecol. Psychol. 23, 157-184. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2011.591262
65. Webber, C. L. Jr., and Zbilut, J. P. (2005). "Recurrence quantification analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems," in Tutorials in Contemporary Nonlinear Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, eds M. A. Riley and G. C. Van Orden (Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation), 26-94. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp(accessed December 1, 2014).
66. Wijnants, M., Hasselman, F., Cox, R., Bosman, A., and Van Orden, G. (2012). An interaction-dominant perspective on reading fluency and dyslexia. Ann. Dyslexia 62, 100-119. doi: 10.1007/s11881-012-0067-3
67. Wittgenstein, L. (1922/1983). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Paris: Universitaires de France.
68. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2010). Philosophical Investigations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
69. Wundt, W. (1900). Zur Kritik tachistoskopischer Versuche. Philos. Stud. 15, 287-317.
70. Wundt, W. (1911). Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie, 6th Edn. Leipzig: Engelmann.
71. Zbilut, J. P., Giuliani, A., and Webber, C. L. (1998). Detecting deterministic signals in exceptionally noisy environments using cross-recurrence quantification. Phys. Lett. A 246, 122-128. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00457-5