A Novel Study: A Situation Model Analysis of Reading Times

Discourse Processes

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 453-474

  McNerney, M Windy ^a   Goodwin, Kerri A ^b   Radvansky, Gabriel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858027842     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.582348     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, S. J. and Conway, M. A. 1993. Investigating the structure of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19: 1165-1177.
2. Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N. and Buchanan, M. 1975. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14: 575-589.
3. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B. and Turner, T. J. 1979. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11: 117-220.
4. Cameron, E. H. 1913. Reading. Psychological Bulletin, 10: 351-353.
5. Copeland, D. E., Radvansky, G. A. and Goodwin, K. A. 2009. A novel study: Forgetting curves and the reminiscence bump. Memory, 17: 323-336.
6. Francis, N. W. and Kucera, H. 1982. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Journal of English Linguistics, 18: 64-70.
7. Gernsbacher, M. A. 1994. Language comprehension as structure building., San Diego, CA: Academic.
8. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M. and Lindem, K. 1987. Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26: 69-83.
9. Graesser, A. C. and Riha, J. R. 1984. "An application of multiple regression techniques to sentence reading times". In New methods in reading research, Edited by: Kieras, D. E. and Just, M. A. 183-218. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Haberlandt, K. F. and Graesser, A. C. 1985. Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114: 357-374.
11. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental models., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87: 329-354.
13. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K. and Eastwood, J. D. 2003. Attention researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12: 176-180.
14. Lutz, M. F. and Radvansky, G. A. 1997. The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36: 293-310.
15. Radvansky, G. A. and Copeland, D. E. 2000. Functionality and spatial relations in situation models. Memory & Cognition, 28: 987-992.
16. Radvansky, G. A. and Copeland, D. E. 2010. Reading times and the detection of event shift processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36: 210-216.
17. Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E. and Zwaan, R. A. 2003. Aging and functional spatial relations in comprehension and memory. Psychology and Aging, 18: 161-165.
18. Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E. and Zwaan, R. A. 2005. A novel study: The mental organization of events. Memory, 13: 796-814.
19. Shields, C. 1994. The stone diaries., New York, NY: Viking.
20. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M. and Schooler, J. 2008. When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory and Cognition, 36: 1144-1150.
21. Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bishof, W. F. and Kingstone, A. 2006. Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real world scenes. Brain Research, 1080: 101-119.
22. Suh, S. Y. and Trabasso, T. 1993. Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32: 279-300.
23. Trabasso, T., Secco, T. and van den Broek, P. W. 1984. "Causal cohesion and story coherence". In Learning and the comprehension of text, Edited by: Mandl, H., Stein, N. L. and Trabasso, T. 83-111. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Trabasso, T. and Stein, N. L. 1994. "Using goal-plan knowledge to merge the past with the present and the future in narrating events on line". In The development of future-oriented processes, Edited by: Haith, M. M., Benson, J. B., Janette, B., Roberts, R. J. and Pennington, B. F. 323-349. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25. Trabasso, T. and van den Broek, P. 1985. Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24: 612-630.
26. Van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies in discourse comprehension., New York, NY: Academic.
27. Zwaan, R. A. 1996. Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 1196-1207.
28. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P. and Graesser, A. C. 1995. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21: 386-397.
29. Zwaan, R. A. and Radvansky, G. A. 1998. Situation models in comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123: 162-185.
30. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E. and Curiel, J. M. 1998. Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2: 199-220.