Erratum: Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur (J Bone and Miner Res. (2014) 29:9 (2090-2100) DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2241);Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2090-2100

  Bredbenner, Todd L ^a   Mason, Robert L ^a   Havill, Lorena M ^b   Orwoll, Eric S ^c   Nicolella, Daniel P ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SOUTHWEST FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE QCT; DXA; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; GEOMETRY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SHAPE AND DENSITY MODEL; HIP FRACTURES; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS;

BONE DENSITY; FEMUR; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84906346760     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: 15234681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2404     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A,. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-25. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22 (3): 465-75.
2. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al. Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11 (8): 669-74.
3. Zhou Z, Radaelli A, Johnell O, Willke RJ, Massimini G,. A retrospective analysis of health care costs for bone fractures in women with early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004; 100 (3): 507-17.
4. Kayan K, Kanis J, McCloskey E,. Osteoporosis management by geriatricians in the UK. Age Ageing. 2003; 32 (5): 553.
5. Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd, Dekutoski MB, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Riggs BL,. Incidence of childhood distal forearm fractures over 30 years: a population-based study. JAMA. 2003; 290 (11): 1479-85.
6. Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE,. The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87 (3): 398-403.
7. Kanis JA,. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet. 2002; 359 (9321): 1929-36.
8. Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, et al. A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13 (7): 527-36.
9. Jepsen KJ, Hu B, Tommasini SM, et al. Genetic randomization reveals functional relationships among morphologic and tissue-quality traits that contribute to bone strength and fragility. Mamm Genome. 2007; 18 (6-7): 492-507.
10. Tommasini SM, Nasser P, Hu B, Jepsen KJ,. Biological co-adaptation of morphological and composition traits contributes to mechanical functionality and skeletal fragility. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23 (2): 236-46.
11. Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, et al. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone. 1997; 20 (3): 213-8.
12. Pulkkinen P, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, Kuhn V, Jamsa T,. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21 (6): 895-01.
13. Pulkkinen P, Jamsa T, Lochmuller EM, Kuhn V, Nieminen MT, Eckstein F,. Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry. Osteoporosis Int. 2008; 19 (4): 547-58.
14. Cootes TF, Hill A, Taylor CJ, Haslem J,. Use of active shape models for locating structure in medical images. Image Vis Comput. 1994; 12: 355-65.
15. Kaus MR, Pekar V, Lorenz C, Truyen R, Lobregt S, Weese J,. Automated 3-D PDM construction from segmented images using deformable models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 22 (8): 1005-13.
16. Lorenz C, Krahnstöver N,. Generation of point-based 3D statistical shape models for anatomical objects. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2000; 77 (2): 175-91.
17. Rueckert D, Frangi AF, Schnabel JA,. Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 22 (8): 1014-25.
18. Blank JB, Cawthon PM, Carrion-Petersen ML, et al. Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials. 2005; 26 (5): 557-68.
19. Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study-a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005; 26 (5): 569-85.
20. Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, et al. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24 (3): 475-83.
21. Marshall LM, Lang TF, Lambert LC, et al. Dimensions and volumetric BMD of the proximal femur and their relation to age among older U.S. men. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21 (8): 1197-206.
22. Heimann T, Oguz I, Wolf I, Styner M, Meinzer H,. Implementing the automatic generation of 3D statistical shape models with ITK (MICCAI Open Science Workshop, 2006). Insight J. 2006 Jul. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1926/224. [online-only journal].
23. Carpenter RD, Beaupré GS, Lang TF, Orwoll ES, Carter DR,. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res. 2005; 20 (9): 1533-42.
24. Faulkner KG, Glüer CC, Grampp S, Genant HK,. Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data. Osteoporos Int. 1993; 3 (1): 36-42.
25. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC,. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990; 14 (1): 107-14.
26. Nicolella DP, Bredbenner TL,. Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modeling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012; 15 (2): 101-10.
27. Bredbenner TL, Mason RL, Havill LM, Orwoll S, Nicolella DP,. Investigating fracture risk classifiers based on statistical shape and density modeling and the MrOS data set. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), 2012, San Francisco, CA. Paper No. 0133. Rosemont, IL: ORS; 2012. Available from: http://www.ors.org/Transactions/58/ 0133.pdf.
28. Chen Y-W, Lin C-J,. Combining SVMs with various feature selection strategies. In:, Guyon I, Gunn S, Nikravesh M, Zadeh LA, editors. Feature extraction: foundations and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 315-24.
29. Tibshirani R,. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1996; 58 (1): 267-88.
30. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J,. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer; 2008.
31. Ambroise C, McLachlan GJ,. Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99 (10): 6562-6.
32. Ruschhaupt M, Huber W, Poustka A, Mansmann U,. A compendium to ensure computational reproducibility in high-dimensional classification tasks. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004; 3: Article 37.
33. LeDell E, Petersen ML, van der Laan MJ,. Computationally efficient confidence intervals for cross-validated area under the ROC curve estimates. University of California Berkeley, Division of Biostatistics, Working Paper Series, Working Paper 304. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley; December 2012. Available from: http://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper304.
34. Stiehl JB, Jacobson D, Carrera G,. Morphological analysis of the proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography. Int Orthopaedics. 2007; 31: 287-92.
35. Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, Link TM,. Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2707-14.
36. Baker-LePain JC, Luker KR, Lynch JA, Parimi N, Nevitt MC, Lane NE,. Active shape modeling of the hip in the prediction of incident hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26 (3): 468-74.
37. Goodyear SR, Barr RJ, McCloskey E, et al. Can we improve the prediction of hip fracture by assessing bone structure using shape and appearance modelling ? Bone. 2013; 53: 188-93.
38. Gregory JS, Stewart A, Undrill PE, Reid DM, Aspden RM,. Identification of hip fracture patients from radiographs using Fourier analysis of the trabecular structure: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Imaging. 2004 Oct 6; 4 (1): 4.
39. Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I, et al. Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. J Bone Miner Res. 2013; 28 (3): 537-46.
40. Testi D, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Gnudi S,. Prediction of hip fracture can be significantly improved by a single biomedical indicator. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002 Jun; 30 (6): 801-7.
41. Naylor KE, McCloskey EV, Eastell R, Yang L,. Use of DXA-based finite element analysis of the proximal femur in a longitudinal study of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2013; 28 (5): 1014-21.