Encoding of configural regularity in the human visual system

Journal of Vision

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Kubilius, Jonas ^a   Wagemans, Johan ^a   Op de Beeck, Hans P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Encoding; fMRI; Grouping; Perceptual organization; Regularity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ENCODING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GROUPING; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REGULARITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SYSTEM; YOUNG ADULT;

ENCODING; FMRI; GROUPING; PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION; REGULARITY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84906085551     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/14.9.11     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Amir, O., Biederman, I., & Hayworth, K. J. (2011). The neural basis for shape preferences. Vision Research, 51(20), 2198-2206
2. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61(3), 183-193
3. Attneave, F. (1959). Applications of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods, and results (Vol. vii). Oxford, England: Henry Holt.
4. Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In W. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication, (pp. 217-234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115-147
6. Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3), 27, 1-27.
7. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in withinsubject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42-45.
8. DiCarlo, J. J., & Cox, D.D. (2007). Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 333-341
9. Doersch, C., Singh, S., Gupta, A., Sivic, J., & Efros, A. A. (2012). What makes Paris look like Paris? ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31(4), 101, 1-101
10. Doi, E., Gauthier, J. L., Field, G. D., Shlens, J., Sher, A., Greschner, M.,. .. Simoncelli, E. P. (2012).
11. Efficient coding of spatial information in the primate retina. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(46), 16256-16264
12. Feldman, J. (1992). Constructing perceptual categories. In Computer vision and pattern recognition, 1992. Proceedings CVPR '92, 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on (pp. 244-250). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
13. Feldman, J. (1997). Regularity-based perceptual grouping. Computational Intelligence, 13(4), 582-623
14. Feldman, J. (2003). Perceptual grouping by selection of a logically minimal model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 55(1), 5-25
15. Feldman, J. (2007). Formation of visual "objects"in the early computation of spatial relations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 816-827
16. Feldman, J. (2009). Bayes and the simplicity principle in perception. Psychological Review, 116(4), 875-887
17. Fiser, J., Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1996). To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human object recognition? Spatial Vision, 10(3), 237-271
18. Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293-301
19. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure (Vol. xi). Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Geisler, W. S., Perry, J. S., Super, B. J., & Gallogly, D. P. (2001). Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Research, 41(6), 711-724.
21. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Hendler, T., Edelman, S., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1998). A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Human Brain Mapping, 6(4), 316-328
22. Hanke, M., Halchenko, Y., Sederberg, P., Hanson, S., Haxby, J., & Pollmann, S. (2009). PyMVPA: A Python toolbox for multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data. Neuroinformatics, 7(1), 37-53
23. Hegd́e, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (2007). A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4. Cerebral Cortex, 17(5), 1100-1116
24. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99(3), 480-517
25. Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., & Vogels, R. (2005). Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15(9), 1308-1321
26. Kayaert, G., Op de Beeck, H. P., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Dynamic prototypicality effects in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 506-519
27. Kim, J. G., & Biederman, I. (2012). Greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric changes in the relations between simple shapes in the lateral occipital cortex. NeuroImage, 63(4), 1818-1826
28. Kourtzi, Z., & Connor, C. E. (2011). Neural representations for object perception: Structure, category, and adaptive coding. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34(1), 45-67
29. Kubilius, J. (2014). A framework for streamlining research workflow in neuroscience and psychology. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 52
30. Lades, M., Vorbruggen, J. C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Wurtz, R. P., & Konen, W. (1993). Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 42(3), 300-311
31. Leeuwenberg, E., & van der Helm, P. A. (2012). Structural information theory: The simplicity of visual form. Cambridge University Press.
32. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442(7102), 572-575
33. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 89-94
34. Li, N., Cox, D. D., Zoccolan, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2009). What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant"object recognition? Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(1), 360-376
35. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(4), 476-490
36. MacEvoy, S. P., & Epstein, R. A. (2009). Decoding the representation of multiple simultaneous objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Current Biology, 19(11), 943-947
37. Misaki, M., Kim, Y., Bandettini, P. A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2010). Comparison of multivariate classifiers and response normalizations for patterninformation fMRI. NeuroImage, 53(1), 103-118
38. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61-64.
39. Ons, B., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Development of differential sensitivity for shape changes resulting from linear and nonlinear planar transformations. I-Perception, 2(2), 121-136
40. Op de Beeck, H., Wagemans, J., & Vogels, R. (2003). Asymmetries in stimulus comparisons by monkey and man. Current Biology, 13(20), 1803-1808
41. Panis, S., Wagemans, J., & de Beeck, H. P. O. (2011) Dynamic norm-based encoding for unfamiliar shapes in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1829-1843
42. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1-2), 8-13
43. Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 10,doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008.
44. Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research, 46(18), 2977-2987
45. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Sigman, M., Cecchi, G. A., Gilbert, C. D., & Magnasco, M. O. (2001). On a common circle: Natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98(4), 1935-1940.
47. Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001). Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 1193-1216
48. Tootell, R., Reppas, J., Kwong, K., Malach, R., Born, R., Brady, T.,. .. Belliveau, J. W. (1995). Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(4), 3215-3230.
49. van der Helm, P. A. (2014). Simplicity in vision: A multidisciplinary account of perceptual organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Van Essen, D. C., Drury, H. A., Dickson, J., Harwell, J., Hanlon, D., & Anderson, C. H. (2001). An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8(5), 443-459
51. van Lier, R., van der Helm, P., & Leeuwenberg, E. (1994). Integrating global and local aspects of visual occlusion. Perception, 23(8), 883-903
52. Van Rensbergen, B., & Op de Beeck, H. P. (2014). The role of temporal context in norm-based encoding of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 121-127
53. Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science, 287(5456), 1273-1276
54. Vogels, R., Biederman, I., Bar, M., & Lorincz, A. (2001). Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than to metric shape differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 444-453
55. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172-1217
56. Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218-1252