To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human object recognition?

Spatial Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 237-271

  Fiser, József ^a   Biederman, Irving ^a   Cooper, Eric E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

ALGORITHMS; EXPERIMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; OPTICAL FILTERS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; RANDOM PROCESSES;

AXES; EDGES; FACE RECOGNITION; OBJECT PARTS; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; SHOCKS; SPATIAL FILTERS; VIEWPOINT INVARIANT CLASSIFIERS;

VISION;

EID: 0030201193     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856896X00150     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barron, A. R. (1993). Universal approximation bounds for superposition of a sigmoidal function. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 39, 930-945.
2. Bartram, D. J. (1974). The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognitive Psychology 6, 325-356.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 115-147.
4. Biederman, I. (1995). Visual object recognition. In: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd edn, Vol. 2, Visual Cognition. D. N. Osherson and S. F. Kosslyn (Eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 121-165.
5. Biederman, I. and Ju, G. (1988). Surface vs. edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology 20, 38-64.
6. Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. E. (1991a). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20, 585-593.
7. Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. E. (1991b). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 23, 393-419.
8. Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perfor. 18, 121-123.
9. Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perfor. 19, 1162-1182.
10. Biederman, I., Hilton, H. J. and Hummel, J. E. (1991). Pattern goodness and pattern recognition. In: The Perception of Structure. Ch. 5. J. R. Pomerantz and G. R. Lockhead (Eds). APA, Washington, DC, pp. 73-95.
11. Buckle, T. W. (1989). Recognition of contour deleted images. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
12. Bruce, V., Valentine, T. and Baddeley, A. (1987). The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1, 109-120
13. Buhmann, J., Lange, J. and von der Malsburg, C. (1989). Distortion invariant object recognition by matching hierarchically labeled graphs. In: IJCNN'89, Vol. 1. Washington, pp. 155-159.
14. Burbeck, C. A and Pizer, S. M. (1995). Object representation by cores - identifying and representing primitive spatial regions. Vision Research 35, 1917-1930
15. Cooper, E. and Biederman, I. (1993). Metric versus viewpoint invariant shape differences in visual object recognition. Investig. Ophthalmol. Visual Science 34, 1080-1080.
16. Daugman, J. G. (1984). Spatial visual channels in the Fourier plane. Vision Research 24, 891-910.
17. Daugman, J. G. (1985). Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 2, 1160-1179.
18. Daugman, J. G. (1988). Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech Signal Proces. 36, 1169-1179.
19. Desimone, R. and Ungerleider, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In: Handbook of Neurophysiology. F. Boller and J. Grafman (Eds). Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (Biomedical Division), pp. 267-299.
20. DeValois, R. L. and DeValois, K. K. (1988). Spatial Vision. N. Y. Oxford Press, New York.
21. Dickinson, S. J., Pentland, A. P. and Rosenfeld, A. (1992). From volumes to views: An approach to 3-D object recognition. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing: Image Understanding 55, 130-154.
22. Edelman, S. (1995). Representation of similarity in 3-dimensional object discrimination. Neural Computation 7, 408-423.
23. Edelman, S. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research 32, 2385-2400.
24. Ellis, R. and Allport, D. A. (1986). Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioural study. In: Artificial Intelligence and its Applications. A. G. Cohn and J. R. Thomas (Eds). Wiley, New York, pp. 245-257.
25. Felleman, D. J. and Van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1, 1-47.
26. Field, D. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am A, Optics and Image Science 4, 2379-2394.
27. Field, D. (1994). What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation 6, 559-601.
28. Fiser, J. and Biederman, I. (1995). Size invariance in visual object priming of gray scale images. Perception 24, 741-748.
29. Heeger, D J. (1994). The representation of visual stimuli in primary visual cortex. Current Directions in Psychological Science 3, 159-163.
30. Heitger, F., Rosenthaler, L., von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E. and Kubler, O. (1992). Simulation of neural contour mechanisms: from simple to end-stopped cells. Vision Research 32, 963-981.
31. Horn, B. K. P. (1975). Obtaining shape from shading information. In: The Psychology of Computer Vision. P. H. Winston (Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 115-155
32. Hummel, J. E. and Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review 99, 480-517.
33. Johnston, A., Hill, H. and Carman, N. (1992) Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 21, 365-375.
34. Jones, J. P. and Palmer, L. A. (1987a) An evaluation of the two dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1233-1258.
35. Jones, J. P. and Palmer, L. A. (1987b). The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol 58, 1187-1211
36. Kalocsai, P., Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. E. (1994). To what extend can the recognition of unfamiliar faces be accounted for by a representation of the direct output of simple cells. Investig Ophthalmol. Visual Science 35, 1626-1626.
37. Kalocsai, P., Biederman, I., Fiser, J. and Fang, P. (1996). Do complementary images (in the Fourier-domain) of faces and objects prime each other? Investig. Ophthalmol. Visual Science 37, 841-841.
38. Kimia, B. B., Tannenbaum, A. R. and Zucker, S. W (1995). Shapes, shocks and deformations: I. The components of 2-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space. Int. J. Computer Vision 15, 189-224.
39. King, I. and Xu, L. (1994). Global and local PCA for face feature extraction. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop, Vail, CO.
40. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. and Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing Science 220, 671-680.
41. Kobatake, E. and Tanaka, K (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 856-867.
42. Koenderink, J. J. and van Doom, A. J. (1980). Photometric invariants related to solid shape. Acta Optica 27, 981-996.
43. Kulikowski, J. J., Marcelja, S. and Bishop, P. O. (1982). Theory of spatial position and spatial frequency relations in the receptive fields of simple cells in the visual cortex. Biol. Cyber. 43, 187-198.
44. Lades, M., Vorbruggen, J. C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Würtz, R. P. and Konen, W. (1993). Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans. Comput. 42, 300-311.
45. Mallat, S. G. (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE J. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence 11, 674-693.
46. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
47. Pentland, A. P. (1986). Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artificial Intelligence 28, 293-331.
48. Phillips, P. J. (1994). Matching pursuit filters applied to face identification. Paper presented at the SPIE Conference on Automatic Systems for the Identification and Inspection of Humans, San Diego, CA.
49. Poggio, T. and Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343, 263-266.
50. Poggio, T. and Girosi, F. (1990). Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks. Science 247, 979-981.
51. Shapley, R. (1994). Linearity and nonlinearity in cortical receptive fields. In: Higher-Order Processing in the Visual System. G. R. Bock and J. A. Goode (Eds). John Wiley, pp. 71-87.
52. Srinivas, K. (1995). Contrast and illumination effects on explicit and implicit measures of memory. Unpublished ms. Boston College.
53. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 71-86.
54. Weiss, Y. and Edelman, S. (1995). Representation of similarity as a goal of early visual processing. Network 6, 19-41.
55. Zhong, S. and Mallat, S. (1990). Compact image representation from multiscale edges. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision, Osaka, Japan.