Association between endovascular performance in a simulated setting and in the catheterization laboratory

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 241-248

  Räder, Sune B E W ^a   Abildgaard, Ulrik ^d   Jørgensen, Erik ^b   Bech, Bo ^a,c   Lönn, Lars ^c   Ringsted, Charlotte V ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Department of Cardiology   (Denmark)

^c International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health   (Denmark)

^d GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Coronary angiography; Predictive validity; Procedure specific rating scale; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIOLOGY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84905858093     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000037     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ammann P, Brunner-La Rocca HP, AngehrnW, Roelli H, Sagmeister M, Rickli H. Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator's experience and the catheter size. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:13-18
2. Bernardi G, Padovani R, Trianni A, et al. The effect of fellows' training in invasive cardiology on radiological exposure of patients. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;128:72-76
3. Räder SB, Jørgensen E, Bech B, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. Use of performance curves in estimating number of procedures required to achieve proficiency in coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:387-393
4. ESC Education Committee of the European Society of Cardiology. The ESC Core Curriculum for the General Cardiologist (2008 update). European Society of Cardiology's homepage 2008; Available from: URL: Available at: http://www.escardio.org/education/coresyllabus/Documents/esc-core-curriculum.pdf
5. Jacobs AK, Babb JD, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Holmes DR Jr. Task force 3: Training in diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization: Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:355-361
6. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:988-994
7. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control, 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2007
8. Heinrichs WL, Lukoff B, Youngblood P, et al. Criterion-based training with surgical simulators: Proficiency of experienced surgeons. JSLS 2007;11:273-302
9. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;338:b1802
10. Stefanidis D, Acker C, Heniford BT. Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training leads to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay. Surg Innov 2008;15:69-73
11. Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 2008;248:166-179
12. Bech B, Lönn L, Falkenberg M, et al. Construct validity and reliability of structured assessment of endovascular expertise in a simulated setting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;42:539-548
13. Berry M, Lystig T, Reznick R, Lönn L. Assessment of a virtual interventional simulator trainer. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:237-243
14. Coates PJ, Zealley IA, Chakraverty S. Endovascular simulator is of benefit in the acquisition of basic skills by novice operators. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:130-134
15. Gallagher AG, Renkin J, Buyl H, Lambert H, Marco J. Development and construct validation of performance metrics for multivessel coronary interventions on the VIST virtual reality simulator at PCR2005. EuroIntervention 2006;2:101-106
16. Lipner RS, Messenger JC, Kangilaski R, et al. A technical and cognitive skills evaluation of performance in interventional cardiology procedures using medical simulation. Simul Healthc 2010;5:65-74
17. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, Brightwell R, Vermassen FE, Cheshire NJ. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:855-863
18. Willoteaux S, Lions C, Duhamel A, et al. Virtual interventional radiology: Evaluation of performances as a function of experience. J Radiol 2009;90:37-41
19. Bech B, Lönn L, Schroeder TV, Räder S, Ringsted C. Capturing the essence of developing endovascular expertise for the construction of a global assessment instrument. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;40:292-302
20. Berry M, Lystig T, Beard J, Klingestierna H, Reznick R, Lönn L. Porcine transfer study: Virtual reality simulator training compared with porcine training in endovascular novices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30:455-461
21. Chaer RA, Derubertis BG, Lin SC, et al. Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: Results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg 2006;244:343-352
22. Dayal R, Faries PL, Lin SC, et al. Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1112-1117
23. Hislop SJ, Hsu JH, Narins CR, et al. Simulator assessment of innate endovascular aptitude versus empirically correct performance. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:47-55
24. Tedesco MM, Pak JJ, Harris EJ Jr, Krummel TM, Dalman RL, Lee JT. Simulation-based endovascular skills assessment: The future of credentialing?. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1008-1014
25. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Malik I, et al. Validation of video-based skill assessment in carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38:1-9
26. Dawson DL. Training in carotid artery stenting: Do carotid simulation systems really help?. Vascular 2006;14:256
27. Kundhal PS, Grantcharov TP. Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surg Endosc 2009;23:645-649
28. Ahmed K, Keeling AN, Fakhry M, et al. Role of virtual reality simulation in teaching and assessing technical skills in endovascular intervention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:55-66
29. Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Assessment in Health Professions Education. New York, NY: Routeledge; 2009
30. De Visser H, Watson MO, Salvado O, Passenger JD. Progress in virtual reality simulators for surgical training and certification. Med J Aust 2011;194:38-40
31. Lönn L, Larzon T, Van Den Berg JC. From puncture to closure of the common femoral artery in endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg 2010;51:791
32. Samal AK, White CJ. Percutaneous management of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:12-23
33. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting. JAMA 2004;292:3024-3026
34. Reinders ME, Blankenstein AH, van Marwijk HWJ, et al. Reliability of consultation skills assessments using standardised versus real patients. Med Educ 2011;45:578-584
35. Stefanidis D, Arora S, Parrack DM, et al. Research priorities in surgical simulation for the 21st century. Am J Surg 2012;203:49-53