Assessment of a virtual interventional simulator trainer

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 237-243

  Berry, Max ^a,e   Lystig, Ted ^b   Reznick, Richard ^c   Lönn, Lars ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Endovascular surgery; Objective assessment; Renal artery stenting; Simulator training; Training; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACCURACY; ADULT; BALLOON; CATHETER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; FLUOROSCOPY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STENT; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33750128265     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/05-1729.1     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Champion H, Gallagher A. Surgical simulation-a good idea whose time has come. Br J Surg. 2003;90:767-768.
2. Madan A, Frantzides C, Shervin N, et al. Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers. Am Surg. 2003;69:1112-1114.
3. Gor M, McCloy R, Stone R, et al. Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for assessment in gynaecology. BJOG. 2003;110:181-187.
4. Grantcharov T, Kristiansen V, Bendix J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91:146-150.
5. Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Ann Surg. 2002;4:458-464.
6. Ström P, Kjellin A, Hedman L, et al. Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:227-231.
7. Grantcharov T, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, et al. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2003;185:146-149.
8. Dankelman J, Wentink M, Grimbergen C, et al. Does virtual reality training make sense in interventional radiology? Training skill-, rule- and knowledge-based behavior. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004;27:417-421.
9. Gallagher AG, Smith CD, Bowers SP, et al. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:479-487.