Virtual interventional radiology: Evaluation of performances as a function of experience;Réalité virtuelle en radiologie vasculaire interventionnelle: Évaluation des performances de l'opérateur selon son niveau d'expérience

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 90, Issue 1 C1, 2009, Pages 37-41

  Willoteaux, S ^a   Lions, C ^b   Duhamel, A ^c   Vernhet, H ^d   Sapoval, M ^e   Boyer, L ^f   Bartoli, J M ^g   Rousseau, H ^h   Beregi, J P ^b  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIV LILLE   (France)

^d MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^f SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

^g TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^h CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

Author keywords

Interventional vascular radiology; Learning; Simulation; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; DEVICE; EXPERIENCE; FLUOROSCOPY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGIST; SIMULATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 60749132192     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)70076-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dawson S. Procedural Simulation: A Primer. Radiology 2006;241:17-25.
2. Patel AA, Gould DA. Simulators in interventional radiology training and evaluation: a paradigm shift is on the horizon. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:S163-73.
3. Gould DA. Interventional radiology simulation: prepare for a virtual revolution in training. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007;18:483-90.
4. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. The Lancet 364:1538-40.
5. Kohn J, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer healthcare system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
6. Desser TS. Simulation-based training: the next revolution in radiology education? J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:816-24.
7. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting: what this means for procedural-based medicine. JAMA 2004;292:3024-36.
8. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Medical Devices Advisory Committee Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/04/transcripts/4033t1.htm. 2004.
9. Aggarwal R, Black SA, Hance JR, et al. Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons' endovascular skills. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:588-93.
10. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, et al. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:855-63.
11. Chaer RA, DeRubertis BG, Lin SC, et al. Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg 2006;244:343-52.
12. Haque S, Srinivasan S. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006;10:51-8.
13. Kessel D, Gould D, Lewandowski B. Virtual Reality Simulation Training can Improve Inexperienced Surgeons' Endovascular Skills. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2007;33:259.
14. Berry M, Lystig T, Beard J, et al. Porcine Transfer Study: Virtual Reality Simulator Training Compared with Porcine Training in Endovascular Novices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30:455-61.
15. Patel AA, Gould DA. Simulators in interventional radiology training and evaluation: a paradigm shift is on the horizon. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:S163-73.
16. Gould DA, Reekers JA, Kessel DO, et al. Simulation devices in interventional radiology: validation pending. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:215-6.