The role of large-scale assessments in research on educational effectiveness and school development

The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments: Perspectives from Technology, Economy, and Educational Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 115-147

  Klieme, Eckhard ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905837711     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4629-9_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Abedi, J., M. Courtney, S. Leon, J. Kao, and T. Azzam. 2006. English language learners and math achievement: A study of opportunity to learn and language accommodation (CSE Report 702, 2006). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Baker, D. P. 2009. The invisible hand of world education culture. In Handbook of education policy research, eds. G. Sykes, B. Schneider and D. N. Plank, 958-968. New York: Routledge.
3. Baumert, J., R. Lehmann, M. Lehrke, B. Schmitz, M. Clausen, and I. Hosenfeld, et al. 1997. TIMSS—Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich. Deskriptive Befunde. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
4. Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, and A. Jordan, et al. 2009. Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal 47:133-180.
5. Borman, G. D., G. M. Hewes, L. T. Overman, and S. Brown. 2003. Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 73:125-230.
6. Brophy, J., ed. 1992. Planning and managing learning tasks and activities: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 3). Greenwich: JAI Press.
7. Brown, A. L. 1994. The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher 23(8):4-12.
8. Bryk, A. S., P. B. Sebring, E. Allensworth, S. Luppescu, and J. Q. Easton. 2010. Organizing schools for improvement. Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Carroll, J.B. 1963. A model of school learning. Teachers College Record64:723-733.
10. Clausen, M. 2002. Unterrichtsqualitat: Eine Frage derPerspektive? Munster: Waxmann.
11. Creemers, B. P. M. 1994. The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
12. Creemers, B. P. M., and L. Kyriakides. 2008. The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice, and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.
13. Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
14. Ditton, H. 2000. Qualitatskontrolle und Qualitatssicherung in Schule und Unterricht. Zeitschrift fur Padagogik 41(Beiheft):73-92.
15. Ditton, H. 2007. Schulqualitat - Modelle zwischen Konstruktion, empirischen Befunden und Implementierung. In Qualitat von Schule, eds. J. van Buer and C. Wagner, 83-92. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.
16. Ditton, H., and L. Krecker. 1995. Qualitat von Schule und Unterricht. Empirische Befunde zu Fra-gestellungen und Aufgaben der Forschung. Zeitschrift fur Padagogik 41(4):507-531.
17. Fend, H. 1998. Qualitat im Bildungswesen. Schulforschung zu Systembedingungen, Schulprofilen undLehrerleistung. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.
18. Goldschmidt, P., K. Choi, and F. Martinez. 2004. Using hierarchical growth models to monitor school performance over time: Comparing NCE to scale score results. CES Report 618. Los Angeles: Center for the study of evaluation, University of California.
19. Gustafsson, J.-E. 2007. Understanding causal influences on educational achievement through analysis of differences over time within countries. In Lessons learned: What international assessments tell us about math achievement, ed. T. Loveless, 37-63. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
20. Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2009. Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. NBER Working Paper No. 14633, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14633.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2011.
21. Hanushek, E. A., and L. Wossmann. 2010. The economics of international differences in educational achievement. NBER Working Papers 15949, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15949.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2011.
22. Harris, A., and J. H. Chrispeels., eds. 2006. Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London: Routledge.
23. Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
24. Hiebert, J. R., H. Gallimore, K. B. Garnier, H. Givven, J. Hollingsworth, and A. M.-Y. Jacobs, et al. 2003. Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.C.
25. Hochweber, J., B. Steinert, J. Gomolka, and E. Klieme. 2010. Schulentwicklung 2000-2003-2006: Befunde auf Basis der PISA-Studien. Paper presented at the 2010 Congress of the German Society for Educational Science (DGFE), Mainz, Germany.
26. Hopkins, D., ed. 2005. The practice and theory of school improvement: International handbook of educational change. Springer: Dordrecht.
27. Husen, T. 1967. International study of achievement in mathematics (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
28. Husen, T. 1974. Introduction to the reviews of three studies of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). American Educational Research Journal 11(4):407-408.
29. Klieme, E., and K. Rakoczy. 2003. Unterrichtsqualitat aus Schulerperspektive. In PISA 2000. Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Lander der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, eds. J. Baumert, C. Ar-telt, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele et al., 333-359. Opladen: Leske + Bu-drich.
30. Klieme, E., and B. Steinert. 2008. Schulentwicklung im Langsschnitt. Ein Forschungspro-gramm und erste explorative Analysen. Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft 10(Sonder-heft):221-238.
31. Klieme, E., and S. Vieluf. 2009. Teaching practices, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes. In Creating effective teaching and learning environments. First results from talis, ed. OECD. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606.pdf.
32. Klieme, E., G. Schumer, and S. Knoll. 2001. Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: Auf-gabenkultur und Unterrichtsgestaltung. In Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) ed. TIMSS—Impulse fur Schule und Unterricht. Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitia-tiven, Praxisberichte und Video-Dokumente, 43-57. Munchen: Medienhaus Biering.
33. Klieme, E., A. Helmke, R. Lehmann, G. Nold, H.-G. Rolff, K. Schroder, et al. eds. 2008. Unterricht undKompetenzerwerb in Deutsch undEnglisch. Ergebnisse derDESI-Studie. Weinheim: Beltz.
34. Klieme, E., C. Pauli, and K. Reusser. 2009. The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German classrooms. In The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in the Classroom, eds. T. Janik and T. Seidel, 137-160. Munster: Waxmann Verlag.
35. Klieme, E., E. Backhoff, W. Blum, J. Buckley, Y. Hong, D. Kaplan, H. Levin, J. Scheerens, W. Schmidt, F. van de Vijver, and S. Vieluf. 2010a. Designing PISA as a sustainable database for educational policy and research: The PISA 2012 Context Questionnaire Framework. Paris: OECD.
36. Klieme, E., N. Fischer, H. G. Holtappels, T. Rauschenbach, and L. Stecher. 2010b. Ganztagsschule - Entwicklung und Wirkungen. Frankfurt a. M.: DIPF.
37. Klieme, E., B. Steinert, and J. Hochweber. 2010c. Zur Bedeutung der Schulqualitat fur Unterricht und Lernergebnisse. In Schulische Lerngelegenheiten undKompetenzentwicklung. Festschrift fur Jurgen Baumert, eds. W. Bos, E. Klieme and O. Koller, 231-255. Munster: Waxmann.
38. Krohne, U. 2010. Comparison of quasi-experimental methods for large-scale assessments: Estimating the effect of bilingual instruction based on a subsample of the DESI study. Invited presentation at the 2010 Symposium on Causality, Jena University, Germany.
39. Kunter, M., T. Dubberke, J. Baumert, W. Blum, M. Brunner, A. Jordan, et al. 2006. Mathematikun-terricht in den PISA-Klassen 2004: Rahmenbedingungen, Formen und Lehr-Lernprozesse. In PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, eds. M. Prenzel, J. Baumert, W. Blum, R. Lehmann, D. Leutner, M. Neubrand et al., 161-194. Munster: Waxmann.
40. Kunter, M., Y.-M. Tsai, U. Klusmann, M. Brunner, S. Krauss, and J. Baumert. 2008. Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perception of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction 18:468-482.
41. Kyriakides, L., and N. Tsangaridou. 2004. School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in physical education. Paper presented at the 85 Annual AERA Meeting, American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA.
42. Lee, J. C., and M. Williams. 2006. School improvement: International perspectives. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
43. Lipowsky, F., K. Rakoczy, C. Pauli, B. Drollinger-Vetter, E. Klieme and K. Reusser. 2009. Quality of Geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean theorem. Learning and Instruction 19:527-537.
44. Luyten, H., and R. de Jong. 1998. Parallel classes: Differences and similarities. Teacher effects and school effects in secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 9(4):437-473.
45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. ed. 2007a. Education at a glance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. ed. 2007b. PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
47. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2008. Education at a glance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2009a. Education at a glance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
49. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2009b. PISA 2009 Assessment framework key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD.
50. Pianta, R. C., and B. K. Hamre. 2009. Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher 38(2):109-119.
51. Purves, A. C. 1987. The evolution of the IEA: A memoir. Comparative Education Review 31(1):10-28.
52. Rowan, B., E. Camburn, and R. Correnti. 2004. Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum in large-scale surveys: Insights from the study of instructional improvement. Elementary School Journal 105:75-102.
53. Sammons, P. 1999. School effectiveness: Coming of age in the 21st century. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
54. Sammons, P., D. Nuttall, P. Cuttance, and S. Thomas. 1995. Continuity of school effects: A longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary school effects on GCSE performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 6(4):285-307.
55. Sammons, P., S. Thomas, and P. Mortimore. 1997. Forging links: Effective schools and effective departments. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
56. Scheerens, J. 2000. Improving school effectiveness. Fundamentals of educational planning series, IIEP, Vol. 68. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
57. Scheerens, J., and R. J. Bosker. 1997. The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Per-gamon Press.
58. Schmidt, W. H., and A. Maier. 2009. Opportunity to learn. In Handbook of Education Policy Research, eds. G. Sykes, B. Schneider and D. N. Plank, 541-559. New York: Routledge.
59. Schmidt, W. H., and C. McKnight. 1995. Surveying educational opportunity in mathematics and science: An international perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17(3):337-353.
60. Schwerdt, G., and A. C. Wuppermann. 2011. Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review 30:365-379.
61. Seidel, T., and R. J. Shavelson. 2007. Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research 77:454-499.
62. Slavin, R. E. 1996. Education for all. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
63. Stanat, P., and G. Christensen. 2006. Where immigrant students succeed—a comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
64. Stevens, F. 1993. Applying an opportunity-to-learn conceptual framework to the investigation of the effects of teaching practices via secondary analyses of multiple-case-study summary data. Journal of Negro Education 62(3):232-248.
65. Stigler, J. W., and J. Hiebert. 1999. The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
66. Stringfield, S. 1994. A model of elementary school effects. In Advances in school effectiveness research and practice, eds. D. Reynolds, B. P. M. Creemers, P. S. Nesselrodt, C. Teddlie, E. C. Shaffer and S. Stringfield, 153-187. Oxford: Pergamon.
67. Teddlie, C., and D. Reynolds. eds. 2000. The international handbook of school effectiveness research. New York: Routledge.
68. Teddlie, C., and S. Stringfield. 1993. Schools make a difference. Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
69. Teddlie, C., and S. Stringfield. 2006. A brief history of school improvement research in the USA. In Improving schools and educational systems: international perspectives, eds. A. Harris and J. Chrispeels, 131-166. London: Routledge.
70. Thomas, S., P. Sammons, P. Mortimore, and R. Smees. 1997. Stability and consistency in secondary schools’ effects on students’ GCSE outcomes over three years. School effectiveness and school improvement 8(2):169-197.
71. Tschannen-Moran, M., and A. Woolfolk Hoy. 2001. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17(7):783-805.
72. Walberg, H. J. 1986. Syntheses of research on teaching. In Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edn.), ed. M. C. Wittrock, 214-229. New York: Macmillan.
73. Walker, D. A. 1976. The IEA six-subject survey: An empirical study of education in twenty-one countries. International studies in evaluation. New York: Wiley.
74. Wang, M. C., G. D. Haertel, and H. D. Walberg. 1993. Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research 63(3):249-294.
75. Willms, J. D., and S. W. Raudenbush. 1989. A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of educational measurement 26(3):209-232.