Ensuring manuscript quality and preserving authorial voice: The balancing act of editors

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 191-197

  Tsang, Eric W K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905828309     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/more.12062     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Aguinis, H., & Vaschetto, S. J. 2011. Editorial responsibility: Managing the publishing process to do good and do well. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 407-422.
2. Chen, X. 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 423-432.
3. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2008. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19(1): 177-183.
4. Hempel, P. S. 2014. The developmental reviewer. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 175-181.
5. Jacobs, J. A. 2008. The case for an activist editorial model. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 124-133. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Konrad, A. M. 2008. Knowledge creation and the journal editor's role. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 3-15. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Liu, L. A. 2014. Addressing reviewer comments as an integrative negotiation. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 183-190.
8. Roth, W.-M. 2002. Editorial power/authorial suffering. Research in Science Education, 32(2): 215-240.
9. Starbuck, W. H. 2003. Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews? Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4): 344-351.
10. Tsang, E. W. K., & Frey, B. S. 2007. The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1): 128-136.
11. Tsui, A. S., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 2009. Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2): 259-275.
12. Van Lange, P. A. M. 1999. Why authors believe that reviewers stress limiting aspects of manuscripts: The SLAM effect in peer review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12): 2550-2566.