Addressing reviewer comments as an integrative negotiation

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 183-190

  Liu, Leigh Anne ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905815173     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/more.12061     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Ashford, S. J. 1996. The publishing process: The struggle for meaning. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia: 119-127. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Chen, X.-P. 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 423-432.
3. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2008. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19(1): 177-183.
4. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. 2004. The influence of power on the information search, impression formation and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 303-319.
5. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. 2011. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin.
6. Hempel, P. S. 2014. The developmental reviewer. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 175-181.
7. Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. 2010. Negotiation (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
8. Murnighan, J. K. 1986. Organizational coalitions: Structural contingencies and the formation processes. In N. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 1: 155-173. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. Murnighan, J. K. 1996. Revising and resubmitting: Author emotions, editor roles, and the value of dialogue. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia: 135-142. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. 1982. The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research, 8: 262-280.
11. Rindova, V. 2008. Editor's comments: Publishing theory when you are new to the game. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 300-303.
12. Shaw, J. D. 2012. From the Editors: Responding to reviewers. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6): 1261-1263.
13. Simons, T., & Tripp, T. 1997. The negotiation checklist: How to win the battle before it begins. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 38(1): 14-23.
14. Thompson, L. 2012. The mind and heart of the negotiator (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
15. Tsang, E. W. K. 2014. Ensuring manuscript quality and preserving authorial voice: A balancing act of editors. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 191-197.
16. Tsui, A. S., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 2009. Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2): 259-275.
17. Ury, W., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. 1988. Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.